Skip to main content

The Neuroscience of Emotion and Its Relation to Cognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Neurosociology

Abstract

In recent years an appreciation for the emotional dimension of life has asserted itself in all of the major disciplines of the liberal arts. There is a good reason for this. While the dangers of passion are well known to all, this chapter will demonstrate neuroscience’s contributions toward making the case for the necessity of emotion for effective cognition. As Socrates implies above, cognition alone and by itself lacks the capacity to move us to action or to grant a critical component to understandings and “realizations” that only experience can give. While an emotionally distanced attitude may be essential to science, as Scheffler (1982) observed, even the notion of the un-emotional scientist is incomplete. One can be passionately devoted to objectivity. If the “unexamined life is not worth living” certainly experience without emotion is pathologically empty.

Thought by itself moves nothing (Socrates as quoted by Irwin 2007:161)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The modular theory of the brain was a creation of evolutionary psychologists and has come under a great deal of criticism. They present modules as being laid down far in the evolutionary past. It is hard to imagine that the human brain has not changed fundamentally in the last 100,000 years or more (See Small 2008).

  2. 2.

    Brodmann’s area 25 is in the brain’s cerebral cortex and the region called the subgenual cingulate. This is a map of the brain’s cytoarchitectural structure used to determine different cellular tissues in the brain and their functions by staining the tissue to distinguish nerve cells.

  3. 3.

    For a further highly technical critique of the somatic-marker hypothesis see Rolls (1999). He sees the somatic-marker hypothesis as a weakened James–Lange theory.

  4. 4.

    This section relies heavily on David Franks (2008).

References

  • Averill, J. R. and E. P. Nunley (1992). Voyages of the heart: Living an emotionally creative life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, K. C. (2003). Comparing the emotional brains of humans and other animals. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, and H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 25–51). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothers, L. (1997). Friday’s footprint: How society shapes the human mind. New York: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothers, L. (2001). Mistaken identity: The mind – body problem reconsidered. New York: State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W. B. (1928). Neural organization for emotional expression. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. (1999). Mapping the mind. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. and M. C. S. Pasqualini (2004). Stronger autonomic response accompanies better learning: A test of damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18(7), 901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L. and A. Ortony (2000). Cognition in emotion: Always, sometimes, or never?. In L. Nadel, R. Lane, G. L. Ahern (Eds.) The cognitive neuroscience of emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, R. (1996). The science of emotion. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. (1989). Cognitive “penetrability” and the emotions. In D. Franks and D. McCarthy (Eds.), The sociology of emotions: Original papers (pp. 33–50). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1977). Varieties and significance of the alexias. Archives of Neurology, 34(6), 325–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error and the future of human life. Scientific American, 271(4), 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (2003). Looking for spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza, R. (1987). The rationality of emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, D. (2006). Turning off depression. In The book of the brain. Scientific American, Guilford, CT: Lyons Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. (1994). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, D. D. (2006). The neuroscience of emotions. In J. E. Stets, J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions. New York: Springer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, D. D. (2008). The controversy of mind over matter: Mead’s solution and applications from neuroscience. Studies in symbolic interaction, 31, 61. New York: Springer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, D. D. (2009). Emotions Review. Forthcoming Emotions on a continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. (1985). The social brain. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. (2008). Human: The science behind what makes us unique, 1st ed. New York: Harper Colins Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2005). The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1884). What is an emotion. Mind, 9, 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (2007). What is emotion: History, measures, and meanings. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1999). How emotions work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyng, S. and D. D. Franks (2002). Sociology and the real world. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, P. D. (1949). Psychosomatic disease and the visceral brain; recent developments bearing on the papez theory of emotion. Psychosomatic Medicine, 11(6), 338.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRea, K., K. N. Ochsner, I. B. Mauss, J. J. D. Gabrieli and J. J. Gross (2008). Gender differences in emotion regulation: An fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11(2), 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohman, A., J. S. Morris and R. J. Dolan (1999). A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. (2000). Neural behaviorism: From brain evolution to human emotion at the speed of an action potential. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perinbanayagam, R. (1989). Signifying emotions. In D. Franks and D. McCarthy (Eds.), The sociology of emotions: Original papers (pp. 73–92). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls, E. (1999). The brain and emotion. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röttger-Rössler, B. and H. J. Markowitsch (2009). Emotions as bio-cultural processes. New York: Springer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I. (1982). Science and subjectivity. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, D. (2008). On the deep history of the brain. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIMH study (2007). Sexual dimorphism of brain during childhood and adolescence. NeuroImage, 36(4), 165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tredway, J. V., S. J. Knapp, L. C. Tredway and D. L. Thomas (1999). The neurosociological role of emotions in early socialization, reasons, ethics and morality. Social Perspectives on Emotion, 5, 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1999). The neurology of emotion: Implications for sociological theories of interpersonal behavior. Social Perspectives on Emotion, 5, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2000). On the origins of human emotions: A sociological inquiry into the evolution of human affect. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth, W. M. and J. Ryan (1992). Balancing body, mind and culture. In D. D. Franks, V. Gecas (Eds.), Social perspectives on emotion, pp. 25. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 31–58). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David D. Franks .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franks, D.D. (2010). The Neuroscience of Emotion and Its Relation to Cognition. In: Neurosociology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5531-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics