Skip to main content

Anorectal Physiology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery

Abstract

Normal bowel continence and evacuation are complex ­processes that involve the coordinated interaction between multiple different neuronal pathways and the pelvic and perineal musculature.1 The importance of the anatomic relationships of the pelvic floor in maintaining normal continence has been suggested since the 1950s.2 However, the complex series of neural and behavioral-mediated interactions, combined with a lack of an ideal study to take all elements into account, makes complete understanding of anorectal anatomy and physiology’s role in preserving continence difficult.3 Complicating this are multiple other factors that play a role in normal regulation such as systemic disease, sphincter integrity, bowel motility, stool consistency, evacuation efficiency, pelvic floor stability, cognitive and emotional affects.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bannister JJ, Gibbons C, Read NW. Preservation of faecal ­continence during rises in intra-abdominal pressure: is there a role for the flap-valve? Gut. 1987;28:1242–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berglas B, Rubin IC. Study of the supportive structures of the uterus by levator myography. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953;97:677–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherry DA, Rothenberger DA. Pelvic floor physiology. Surg Clin North Am. 1988;68(6):1217–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mavrantonis C, Wexner SD. A clinical approach to fecal ­incontinence. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;27(2):108–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Woodburne RT. Essentials of human anatomy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henry MM, Swash M, editors. Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd; 1992. p. 3–249.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bourdelat D, Muller F, Droulle P, Barbet JP. Anatomical and sonographical studies of the development of fecal continence and sphincter development in human fetuses. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;11:124–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalley AF. The riddle of the sphincters. The morphysiology of the anorectal mechanism reviewed. Am Surg. 1987;53:298–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wunderlich M, Swash M. The overlapping innervation of the two sides of the external anal sphincter by the pudendal nerves. J Neurol Sci. 1983;59:97–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamdy S, Enck P, Aziz Q, Uengoergil S, Hobson A, Thompson DG. Laterality effects of human pudendal nerve stimulation on corticoanal pathways: evidence for functional asymmetry. Gut. 1999;45(1):58–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Uher E, Swash M. Sacral reflexes: physiology and clinical application. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1165–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Penninckx F, Lestar B, Kerremans R. The internal anal sphincter: mechanisms of control and its roles in maintaining anal continence. Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;6:193–213.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerremans R. The composition of anal basal pressure: an in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;4:118–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sangwan Y, Solla J. Internal anal sphincter: advances and insights. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1297–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sorensen SM et al. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989;24:115–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jorge JMN, Wexner S. Anatomy and physiology of the rectum and anus. Eur J Surg. 1997;163:723–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rossolimo G. Der Analreflex, seine physiologie und pathologie. Neurologisches Centralblatt 1891;4:257–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henry MM, Parks AG, Swash M. The anal reflex in idiopathic faecal incontinence: an electrophysiological study. Br J Surg. 1980;67:781–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartolo DC, Jarratt JA, Read NW. The cutaneo-anal reflex: a useful index of neuropathy? Br J Surg. 1983;70(11):660–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chan CL, Ponsford S, Swash M. The anal reflex elicited by cough and sniff: validation of a neglected clinical sign. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(10):1449–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Amarenco G, Ismael SS, Lagauche D, Raibaut P, Rene-Corail P, Wolff N, et al. Cough anal reflex: strict relationship between intravesical pressure and pelvic floor muscle electromyographic activity during cough. Urodynamic and ­electrophysiological study. J Urol. 2005;173(1):149–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bors E, Blinn K. Bulbocavernousus reflex. J Urol. 1959;82:128–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Podnar S. Electrodiagnosis of the anorectum: a review of techniques and clinical applications. Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7:71–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gowers WR. The automatic action of the sphincter ani. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1877;26:77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Denny-Brown D, Robertson EG. An investigation of the nervous control of defecation. Brain. 1935;58:256–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van Duijvendijk P, Slors F, Taat CW, Heisterkamp SH, Obertop H, Boeckxstaens GEE. A prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision in patients with a rectal carcinoma. Surgery. 2003;133:56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duthie HL, Bennett RC. The relation of sensation in the anal canal to the functional anal sphincter: a possible factor in anal continence. Gut. 1963;4:179–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chiarioni G, Bassotti G, Stanganini S, Vantini I, Whitehead WE. Sensory retraining is key to biofeedback therapy for formed stool fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(1):109–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tomita R, Tanjoh K, Fujisaki S, Fukuzawa M. The role of nitric oxide (NO) in the human internal anal sphincter. J Gastroenterol. 2001;36(6):386391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. de Lorijn F, Omari TI, Kok JH, Taminiau AJM, Benninga MA. Maturation of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in very premature infants. J Pediatr. 2003;143:630–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lubowski DZ, Nichols RJ, Swash M, Jordan MY. Neural control of internal anal sphincter function. Br J Surg. 1987;74:668–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Saigusa N, Belin BM, Choi HJ, Gervaz P, Efron JE, Weiss EG, et al. Recovery of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex after restorative proctocolectomy: does it correlate with nocturnal continence? Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(2):168–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. O’Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P, Horgan A, Kiran WO. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(9):874–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaur G, Gardiner A, Duthie GS. Rectoanal reflex parameters in incontinence and constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(7):928–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pfefferkorn MD, Croffie JM, Corkiins MR, Gupta SK, Fitzgerald JF. Impact of sedation and anesthesia on the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;38(3):324–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Heyt GJ, Oh MK, Alemzadeh N, Rivera S, Jimenez SA, Rattan S, et al. Impaired rectoanal inhibitory response in scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): an association with fecal incontinence. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49(6):1040–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rao SSC. Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:S14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sangwan YP, Coller JA, Barrett RC, Murray JJ, Roberts PL, Schoetz Jr DJ. Prospective comparative study of abnormal distal rectoanal excitatory reflex, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, and single fiber density as markers of pudendal neuropathy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:794–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Beck DE, Wexner SD. Fundamentals of anorectal surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1998. p. 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Parks AG. Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med. 1975;68:681–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jorgenson J, Stein P, King DW, Lubowski DZ. The anorectal angle is not a reliable parameter on defaecating proctography. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993;63(2):105–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Rosato GO, Sullivan ML, Jagelman DG. How reliable are currently available methods of measuring the anorectal angle? Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(4):332–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Broen PM, Penninckx FM. Relation between anal electrosensitivity and rectal filling sensation and the influence of age. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(1):127–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Harper CM, Hough D, Daube JR, Stevens C, et al. Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Gut. 2005;54(4):546–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rasmussen O. Anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(4):386–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. van Dam JH, Ginai AZ, Gosselink MJ, et al. Role of defecography in predicting clinical outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(2):201–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Locke-Edmunds JC, Virjee J, Mortensen NJ. Flap-valve theory of anorectal continence. Br J Surg. 1986;73(12):1012–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ. Differences in anal sensation in continent and incontinent patients with perineal descent. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;4(1):45–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Berkelmans I, Heresbach D, Leroi AM, et al. Perineal descent at defecography in women with straining at stool: a lack of specificity or predictive value for future anal incontinence? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995;7(1):75–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lowry AC, Simmang CL, Boulos P, et al. Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer: report of the Tripartite consensus conference on definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer, Washington, D.C., May 1, 1999. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(7):915–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ron Y, Avni Y, Lukovetski A, et al. Botulinum toxin type-A in therapy of patients with anismus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(12):1821–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments.

This chapter was written by Susan M. Parker and John M. Coller in the first edition of this textbook.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 ASCRS (American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karulf, R.E. (2011). Anorectal Physiology. In: Beck, D.E., Roberts, P.L., Saclarides, T.J., Senagore, A.J., Stamos, M.J., Wexner, S.D. (eds) The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1584-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1584-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1581-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1584-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics