Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Literacy Studies ((LITS,volume 2))

  • 888 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter makes the controvertial claim that the skills that distinguish readers from non-readers provide an unreliable guide as to what should be taught. Furthermore, such research has inadvertently encouraged an extremely teacher centered pedagogy in many Western countries especially the United States and Britain. It traces this development to Thorndike’s behavioristic assumptions about teaching and learning. A more general theory of pedagogy makes a sharp distinction between teaching and learning and explores the options available to educators as they attempt to reconcile the agency of the learner, that is, what the learner is trying to do and willing to do, with the goals and standards of the teacher, that is, what the teacher hopes to help the learners achieve. It is argued that through the negotiation of shared goals and standards learners can come to take some responsibility for their own learning. The teacher’s responsibility is to help them do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barzun, J. (1945). Teacher in America. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartier, A. M., & Hebrard, J. (2001). Literacy and schooling from the cultural historian’s point of view. In T. S. Popkewitz, B. M. Franklin & M. Pereyra (Eds.), Cultural history and education: critical essays of knowledge and schooling (pp. 263–288). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, L. A. (1961). The transformation of the school: progressivism in American education 1876–1957. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1976). The child and the curriculum. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: the middle works, volume 2: 1902–1903 (pp. 271–291). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel, H. B. (1970). Herbart and Herbartianism: an educational ghost story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N., & Berliner, D. (1975). Educational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. H. (1973). What is teaching? In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The philosophy of education (pp. 163–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: the troubling history of educational research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1966). Critique of pure reason (F. Max Muller, trans.). Garden City, NJ: Anchor Books. Originally published in 1881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, A., & Tomasello, M. (1996). Cultural learning and learning culture. In D. Olson (Ed.), Handbook of education and human development: new models of teaching, learning, and schooling (pp. 169–187). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: how school remakes mind and society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (2007). Jerome Bruner. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1996). Why animals lack pedagogy and some cultures have more of it than others. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 302–323). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (1985). The schools we deserve: reflections on the educational crises of our times. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (Ed.) (1990) Research in teaching and learning: a project of American educational research association. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace, W. T. (1920). (Ed.) A critical history of Greek philosophy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational psychology: volume II: the psychology of learning. New York: Teachers College Columbia University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopic: a century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Olson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Olson, D.R. (2010). Whatever Happened to Pedagogical Theory?. In: Aram, D., Korat, O. (eds) Literacy Development and Enhancement Across Orthographies and Cultures. Literacy Studies, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics