Skip to main content

The Role of Forage Crops in Multifunctional Agriculture

  • Chapter
Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses

Part of the book series: Handbook of Plant Breeding ((HBPB,volume 5))

Abstract

UNESCO defines grassland as “land covered with herbaceous plants with less than 10 percent tree and shrub cover”. In many cases, grassland is grazing land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benoit, M. and Simon, J-C. 2004. Grassland and water resources: recent findings and challenges in Europe. Grassland Sci. Eur. 9:117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommelé, L. 2007. Growing potatoes and grass-clover after turned down grassland. Ph. Thesis, University of Gent. 176 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casals, P., Garcia-Pausas, J., Romanyá, J., Camarero, L., Sanz, M.J. and Sebastiá, M.T. 2004. Effects of livestock management on carbon sinks and fluxes in grassland systems in the Pyrenees. Grassland Sci. Eur. 9:136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceotto, E. 2007. Grasslands for bioenergy production. Rev. Agronomy Sustain. Dev. 27:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conijn, J.G., Velthof, G.L. and Taube, F. 2002. Grassland resowing and grass-arable crop rotations. Plant Research International, Report 47 and European Grassland Federation, Report 1. 128 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. 2005. Ragwort poisoning in livestock: prevention and control. SAC 2005, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH93JG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decruyenaere, V., Hennart, S. and Stimant, D. 2007. Environmental impact of sheep-cattle association under grazing. Grassland Sci. Eur. 12:279–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delagarde, R., Prache, S., D’Hour, P. and Petit, P. 2001. Ingestion de l’herbe par les ruminants au pâturage. Fourrages 166:189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delagarde, R., Faverdin, P., Baratte, C. and Peyreaud, J.L. 2004. Prévoir l’ingestion d’herbe et la production des vaches laitières: GRAZEIN, un modèle pour raisonner l’alimentation au pâturage. Renc. Rech. Ruminants 11:295–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgersma, A., Tamminga, S. and Ellen, G. 2006. Modifying milk composition through forage. Animal Feed Sci. Technol. 131:207–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grevilliot, F., Krebs, L. and Muller, S. 1998. Comparative importance and interference of hydrological conditions and soil nutrient gradients in floristic biodiversity in flood meadows. Biodivers. Conserv. 7:1495–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J.P., Eriksen, J. and Jensen, L.S. 2005. Residual nitrogen effect of a dairy crop rotation as influenced by grass-clover ley management, manure type and age. Soil Use Manage. 21:278–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirata, M. 2004. Forage crop production. In: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK. [http://www.eolss.net]

  • Hirata, M. 2005. Forage crop production. In: the management of natural resources in satisfying the need for human life: the role of agriculture, forestry and fisheries in human nutrition, from Encylopedia of life support systems. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. and Del Prado, A. 2006. Implications of climate change for grassland: impacts, adaptations and mitigation options. Grassland Sci. Eur. 11:749–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A.E. 1986. Soil organic matter, effects on soils and crops. Soil Use Manage. 2:97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan et al. 2007. Evenness drives consistent diversity effects in an intensive grassland system across 28 European sites. J. Ecol. 95:530–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaergaard, T. 2003. A plant that changed the world: rise and fall of clover 1000–2000. Landsc. Res. 28(1):41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaergaard, T. 2006. The danish revolution 1500–1800: an ecohistorical interpretation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 314 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazoyer, M. and Roudart, L. 2002. Histoire des agricultures du monde: du néolitique á la crise contemporaire. Editions du seuil. 699 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestdagh, I., Lootens, P. and Carlier, L. 2004. Variation in organic carbon content in Flemish grassland soils. Grassland Sci. Eur. 9:133–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R., Steinfield, H., Falcon, W., Galloway, J., Smil, V., Bradford, E., Alder, J. and Mooney, H. 2005. Losing the link between livestock and land. Science 210:1621–1622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevens, F. and Reheul, D. 2002. The nitrogen- and non-nitrogen contribution effect of ploughed grass leys on the following arable crops: determination and optimum use. Eur. J. Agron. 16:57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevens, F. and Reheul, D. 2003a. Effects of cutting or grazing swards on herbage yield, nitrogen uptake and residual soil nitrate at different levels on N fertilization. Grass Forage Sci. 58:431–449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nevens, F. and Reheul, D. 2003b. Permanent grassland and 3-year leys alternating with 3 years of arable land: 31 years of comparaison. Eur. J. Agron. 19:77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, T., Pulina, G., Sikosana, J.L.N. and Connolly, J. 1999. Mixed animal type grazing research under temperate and semi-arid conditions. Outlook Agric. 28(2):117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedro Silva, J., Toland, J., Jones, W., Eldridge, J., Thorpe, E. and O’Hara, E. 2008. LIFE and Europe’s grasslands: restoring a forgotten habitat. DG environment of the EU (LIFE unit-E4). 54 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyreaud, J.L., Mosquera-Losada, R. and Delaby, L. 2004. Challenges and tools to develop efficient dairy systems based on grazing: how to meet animal performance and grazing management. Grassland Sci. Eur. 9:373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflimlin, A. and Todorov, N.A. 2003. Trends in European forage systems for meat and milk production: facts and new concerns. Grassland Sci. Eur. 8:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidsma, P., Tekelenburg, T., van den Berg, M. and Alkemade, R. 2006. Impacts of land-use change on biodiversity: an assessment of agricultural biodiversity in the European Union. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 114:86–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reheul, D., De Vliegher, A., Bommelé, L. and Carlier, L. 2007. The comparison between temporary and permanent grassland. Grassland Sci. Eur. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlich, E., Biegler, I., Hardtert, B., Luz M., Schröder, S., Schroeber, J. and Winnebeck, S. 2006. La consommation d’énergie finale de différents produits alimentaires : un essai de comparaison. Cahiers de l’Environ. 53:111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soussana, J-F. and Lüscher, A. 2007. Temperate grasslands and global atmospheric change: a review. Grass Forage Sci. 62:127–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suttie, J.M., Reynolds, S.G. and Batello, C. 2005. Grasslands of the world. FAO, plant production and protection series. 34:514 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, D., Hill, J. and Lehman, C. 2006. Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A., Vellinga, T.V., Johansen, A. and Kennedy, E. 2008. To graze or not to graze, that’s the question. Grassland Sci. Eur. 13:706–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eekeren, N., Bommelé, L., Bloem, J., Schouten, T., Rutgers, M., de Goede, R., Reheul, D. and Brussaard, L. 2008. Soil biological quality after 36 years of ley-arable cropping, permanent grassland and permanent arable cropping. Appl. Ecol. 40:432–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eekeren, N., Murray, P.J. and Smeding, F.W. 2007. Soil biota in grassland, its ecosystem services and the impact of management. Grassland Sci. Eur. 12:247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertès, F., Hatch, D., Velthof, G., Taube, F., Laurent, F., Loiseau, P. and Recous, S. 2007. Short-term and cumulative effects of grassland cultivation on nitrogen and carbon cycling in ley-arable rotations. Grassland Sci. Eur. 12:227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, R. 1650. A discourse of husbandry used in Brabant and Flanders, showing the wonderful improvement of land there and serving as a pattern for our practice in this commonwealth. William Du Gard, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Reheul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reheul, D., De Cauwer, B., Cougnon, M. (2010). The Role of Forage Crops in Multifunctional Agriculture. In: Boller, B., Posselt, U.K., Veronesi, F. (eds) Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses. Handbook of Plant Breeding, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0760-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics