Skip to main content

Responses of Small Mammals to Predator Odors in the Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1055 Accesses

Abstract

While we are asleep, forests, meadows, and fields teem with nocturnal mammals. Dramatic scenes of predation take place, all unseen by humans. In this exercise, we will learn how to indirectly record such nocturnal interactions between predator and prey.

Mammalian predators possess keen senses of smell and hearing, ensuring their meals. The prey animals, on the other hand, are adept at detecting and avoiding predators. Again, olfaction plays an important role in this survival mechanism.

Although prey species must coexist with predators, they reduce predation risk by monitoring whereabouts and activity of their main predators and avoiding them to the greatest extent possible in both space and time. Most small mammals rely on olfaction to detect and avoid predators. They can smell mammalian predators such as wolves, coyotes, foxes, cats, or mustelids directly, or extract information about time and place of their activities from predator sign such as droppings, urine, scent marks with secretions from skin glands, tracks, rubs, or scrapings. Rodents can distinguish the odors of different carnivore species. Herbivorous prey species tend to respond more strongly to the odors of sympatric predators than to those of allopatric carnivores (Müller-Schwarze 1972).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Calder CJ, Gorman ML (1991) The effects of red fox Vulpes vulpes faecal odours on the feeding behaviour of Orkney voles Microtus arvalis. J Zool Lond 224:599–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR, Doncaster CP, (1984) Responses of small mammals to Red fox (Vulpes vulpes) odour. J Zool Lond 204:521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhart A, Müller-Schwarze D (1995) Responses of beaver (Castor canadensis) to predator chemicals. J Chem Ecol 21:1349–1364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman ML (1984) The response of prey to Stoat (Mustela erminea) scent. J Zool Lond 202:419–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B (1990) Effect of a predator’s visit on the spatial distribution of bank voles: Experiments with weasels. Can J Zool 68:660–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Schwarze D (1972) Responses of young black-tailed deer to predator odors. J Mammalogy 53:393–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolte DL, Mason JR, Epple G, Aronov E, Campbell DL (1994) Why are predator urines aversive to prey? J Chem Ecol 20:1505–1516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TP, Crump DR, Sullivan DS (1988) Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. III. Montane and meadow voles (Microtus montanus and Microtus pennsylvanicus). J Chem Ecol 14:363–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Müller-Schwarze, D. (2009). Responses of Small Mammals to Predator Odors in the Field. In: Hands-On Chemical Ecology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0378-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics