The theory of the comparative market economies (Hall and Soskice 2001) draws a core distinction between two basic types of market economies – liberal market economies and coordinated market economies, which constitute ideal types at the poles of a spectrum along which many national market economies can be arrayed. In liberal market economies, like those of the USA and the UK, firms coordinate their activities primarily via hierarchies and a competitive market mechanism which are well described by classic literature (Williamson 1985). The market mechanism in a context of competition provides a highly effective means for coordinating firms’ endeavors in liberal market economies. In coordinated market economies, like those of Japan and Germany, firms depend more heavily on nonmarket institutional coordination to coordinate their endeavors with other economic actors to construct their core competencies. Firms make extensive use of nonmarket modes of coordination, including network coordinating and monitoring, reliance on collaborative as opposed to competitive relationships, and relational or incomplete contracting (Hall and Soskice 2001, p. 8).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liao, C. (2009). General Theory. In: The Governance Structures of Chinese Firms. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0036-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0036-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0035-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0036-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)