Skip to main content

Organizational Routines as Mechanisms for Knowledge Creation, Utilization, and Storage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 4))

Abstract

Organizational routines can be viewed as mechanisms for knowledge creation, utilization, and storage. Many routines, by their very nature, become buried in the daily work of an organization. In time, organization members become less conscious of many routines and these routines subsequently become more difficult to manage. This difficulty reduces the likelihood, in some cases, that the knowledge benefits originating from routines will be effectively appropriated by the organization. This paper describes the nature of organizational routines and describes some ways in which they can be managed for positive organizational benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Badaracco, J.L. 1991. The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballinger, G.A., and F.D. Schoorman. 2007. Individual reactions to leadership succession in workgroups. Academy of Management Review 32(1): 118–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N., J. Brüderl, and M. Woywode. 2008. Momentum or deceleration? Theoretical and methodological reflections on the analysis of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal 51(3): 413–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloodgood, J.M., and J.L. Morrow. 2003. Strategic organizational change: Exploring the roles of environmental structure, internal conscious awareness and knowledge. Journal of Management Studies 40(7): 1761–1782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloodgood, J.M., and W.D. Salisbury. 2001. Understanding the influence of organizational change strategies on information technology and knowledge management strategies. Decision Support Systems 31: 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 2005. Brokerage & closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, E., A. Bradburn, and G. Sugden. 2004. Managing and leveraging knowledge for organisational advantage. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 2: 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D. 1991. Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections. Organization Science 2(1): 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D., and P. Bacdayan. 1994. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science 5(4): 554–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D., R. Burkhart, G. Dosi, M. Egidi, L. Marengo, M. Warglien, and S. Winter. 1996. Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial & Corporate Change 5(3): 653–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M., and J.G. March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFillippi, R.J., M.B. Arthur, and V.J. Lindsay. 2006. Knowledge at work: Creative collaboration in the global economy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., and K. Cool. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35(12): 1504–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A.C., R.M. Bohmer, and G.P. Pisano. 2001. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 685–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal 32(3): 543–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erden, Z., G. von Krogh, and I. Nonaka. 2008. The quality of group tacit knowledge. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17: 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.S., and B.T. Pentland. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay, S. 2006. Towards conceptual clarity for ‘tacit knowledge’: A review of empirical studies. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 4: 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W., and M. Stadler. 2006. Path dependence without denying deliberation – A continuous transition model connecting teleology and evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17: 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, N.P., and J.E. Beasley. 2001. Placing boxes on shelves: A case study. Journal of the Operational Research Society 52: 605–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoetger, G., and R. Agarwal. 2007. Death hurts, but isn’t fatal: The postexit diffusion of knowledge created by innovative companies. Academy of Management Journal 50(2): 446–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Grenville, J.A. 2005. The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science 16(6): 618–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itami, H., and T. Numagami. 1992. Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology. Strategic Management Journal 13: 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, W.R. 2006. The critical role of information processing in creating an effective knowledge organization. Journal of Database Management 17(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott, A.M. 2001. The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Science 47(3): 430–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. 1966. The savage mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, T.-P., Y.-C. OuYang, and D.J. Power. 2007. Effects of knowledge management capabilities on perceived performance: An empirical examination. Annals of Information Systems 2: 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., and H.A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, K. 2005. Adapting an existing portal for HR at Ernst & Young. Knowledge Management Review 8(2): 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., and S. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, D.A., L.T. Baker, T.E. Beck, M. Kulkarni, S.T. Solansky, and D.V. Travis. 2007. Radical change accidently: The emergence and amplification of small change. Academy of Management Journal 50(3): 515–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen, T., and A. Vepsalainen. 1994. Procurement strategies for information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 11(2): 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, M.A. 1997. Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 237–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, A., and M. Hoegl. 2006. Knowledge creation in new product development projects. Journal of Management 32(2): 210–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singley, M.K., and J.R. Anderson. 1989. The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.A., J.D. McKeen, and S. Singh. 2006. Making knowledge work: Five principles for action-oriented knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 4: 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, J. 1998. Knowledge in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B.M., L.E. Sandelands, and J.E. Dutton. 1981. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, D. 2001. Leveraging tacit organizational knowledge. Journal of Management Information Systems 17(3): 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G., and J. Roos. 1996. Imitation of knowledge: A sociology of knowledge perspective. In Managing knowledge, ed. G. von Krogh, and J. Roos. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G., K. Ichijo, and I. Nonaka. 2000. Enabling knowledge creation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vromen, J.J. 2006. Routines, genes, and program-based behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16: 543–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. 1988. Environmental structure and theories of strategic choice. Journal of Management Studies 25(6): 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James M. Bloodgood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bloodgood, J.M. (2009). Organizational Routines as Mechanisms for Knowledge Creation, Utilization, and Storage. In: King, W. (eds) Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Annals of Information Systems, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics