Skip to main content

On Using Organizational Knowledge Capabilities to Assist Organizational Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 4))

Abstract

Knowledge management (KM) and organizational learning (OL) are attracting increasing attention from both academics and practitioners in the knowledge economy era. Recognizing the dynamics of KM research, organizational knowledge from a capability-based perspective is advocated as an essential force to aid a firm’s growth. Learning embedded in organizational activities is viewed as a knowledge process that facilitates innovation. In this study, we take organizational knowledge capability (OKC) and process-oriented OL as the two primary research variables. Additionally, we consider OKC as a socio-technical system and divide it into social-based OKC and technical-based OKC, which tries to assist the development of process-oriented OL. Our objective is to construct a relationship between OKC and OL. Specifically, we propose a conceptual model that shows the KM–OL link, and advance research propositions for future empirical testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Alavi, M., and D.E. Leidner. 1999. Knowledge management systems: Issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the AIS 1(7): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M., and D.E. Leidner. 2001. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Cconceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly 25(1): 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., and D.A. Schön. 1978. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassellier, G., I. Benbasat, and B. Reich. 2003. The influence of business managers’ IT competence on championing IT. Information Systems Research 14: 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, J., A. Jantunen, and J.M. Saksa. 2004. Managing knowledge creation and sharing – Scenarios and dynamic capabilities in inter-industrial knowledge network. Journal of Knowledge Management 8(6): 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A.S. 2000. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 24(1): 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, G.D. 2001. Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of Knowledge Management 5(1): 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, G.D., and V. Grover. 2005. Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(2): 253–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenrieder, I. 2002. Social architecture as a prerequisite for organizational learning. Management Learning 33(2): 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiva-Gomez, R. 2003. The facilitating factors for organizational learning: Bringing ideas from complex adaptive systems. Knowledge and Process Management 10: 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, S.W. 2003. Computer systems to facilitating organizational learning: Information technology and organizational context. Expert Systems with Applications 24: 273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, S.H. 2004. A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: An empirical investigation. Expert Systems with Applications 27(3): 459–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, E. 2002. Knowledge management: A sociotechnical perspective. In: Knowledge management in the sociotechnical world, eds. Coakes et al. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.L., and K.E. Weick. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review 9: 284–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H., D.W. De Long, and M.C. Beers. 1998. Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review 39(2): 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H., and L. Prusak. 1998. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, R. 2000. Knowledge capabilities as the focus of organisational development and strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management 4(4): 320–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G.S. 1994. Continuous learning about markets. California Management Review 36(4): 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debowski, S. 2006. Knowledge management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimovski, V., M. Škerlavaj, M. Kimman, and T. Hernaus. 2008. Comparative analysis of the organisational learning process in Slovenia, Croatia, and Malaysia. Expert Systems with Applications 34(4): 3063–3070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., O. Narasimhan, and S. Rajiv. 2005. Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management Journal 26: 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drejer, A. 2000. Organizational learning and competence development. The Learning Organization 7(4): 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C.M., and M.A. Lyles. 1985. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review 10(4): 803–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghingold, M., and B. Johnson. 1997. Technical knowledge as value added in business markets. Industrial Marketing Management 26: 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, A.H., A. Malhotra, and A.H. Segars. 2001. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(1): 185–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter Special Issue): 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K., and V. Govindarajan. 2000. Knowledge management’s social dimension: lessons from Nucor Steel. Sloan Management Review 42: 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H. 2001. Input-friendliness: Motivating knowledge sharing across intranets. Journal of Information Science 27(3): 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.T., N. Nohria, and T. Tiernet. 1999. What’s your strategy for managing knowledge. Harvard Business Review Mar-Apr: 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing process and the literatures. Organizational Science 2(1): 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janz, B.D., and P. Prasarnphanich. 2003. Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management: The importance of a knowledge-centered culture. Decision Sciences 34(2): 351–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A.C., and W.K. Tsang. 2005. Social capital, network, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review 30(1): 146–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W.R. 1995. Creating strategic capabilities architecture. Information System Management 12(1): 67–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, W.R. 2001. Strategies for creating a learning organization. Information System Management winter: 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W.R. 2002. IT capabilities, business processes, and impact on the bottom line, Information System Management 85–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W.R., T.R. Chung, and M.H. Haney. 2008. Knowledge management and organizational learning. Omega 36: 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J.C. 2001. Managerial concerns in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management 5(1): 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. 2001. Social capital. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, S.P., J.M.M. Peón, and C.J.V. Ordás. 2004. Managing knowledge: The link between culture and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management 8(6): 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, D., and D.J. Pauleen. 2003. Perceptions of knowledge management: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management 4(7): 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meso, P., and R. Smith. 2000. A resource-based view of organizational knowledge management system. Journal of Knowledge Management 4(3): 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevis, E.C., A.J. DiBella, and J.M. Gould. 1995. Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Management Review 36(2): 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell, C., K. Wiig, and P. Odem. 1999. Benchmarking unveils emerging knowledge management strategies. Benchmarking 6(3): 202–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, S.L., and H. Scarbrough. 1998. A socio-technical view of knowledge-sharing at Buckman Laboratories. Journal of Knowledge Management 2(1): 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P.A., and O.A. El Sawy. 2006. From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research 17(3): 198–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky, P. 2001. The treatment of organizational learning in management science. In Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge, eds. Dierkes et al. Oxford, UK: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, J.D., and G.H. Stonehouse. 2000. Organizational learning and knowledge assets – An essential partnership. The Learning Organization 7(4): 184–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, J.D., G.H. Stonehouse, and D.J. Yarrow. 2001. Benchmarking and the role of organizational learning in developing competitive advantage. Knowledge and Process Management 8(2): 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, I.M., and M. Easterby-Smith. 2006. Dynamic capabilities and the role of organizational knowledge: An exploration. European Journal of Information Systems 15: 500–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real, J.C., A. Leal, and J.L. Roldan. 2006. Information technology as a determinant of organizational learning and technological distinctive competences. Industrial Marketing Management 35: 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Mercader, J., A.L. Meroño-Cerdan, and R. Sabater-Sánchez. 2006. Information technology and learning: Their relationship and impact on organizational performance in small businesses. International Journal of Information Management 26: 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula, J.M. 1994. Market information processing and organizational learning. Journal of Marketing 58(1): 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S.F., and J.C. Narver. 1995. Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing 59(3): 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.C. and M. McLaughlin. 2004. Knowledge management: People are important! Journal of Knowledge Management Practice 5 (http://www.tlainc.com/).

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, G.F., B.R. Lewis, and C.A. Snyder. 2002. Development of a measure for the organizational learning construct. Journal of Management Information System 19(2): 175–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippins, M.J., and R.S. Sohi. 2003. IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal 24(8): 745–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.B., S.W. Sussman, and J.C. Henderson. 2001. Understanding “strategic learning”: Linking organizational learning, knowledge management, and sensemaking. Organization Science 12(3): 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C.L., and P.K. Ahmed. 2003. Organizational learning: A critical review. The Learning Organization 10(1): 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., and L.C. Chen. 2007. Can organizational knowledge capabilities affect knowledge sharing behavior? Journal of Information Science 33(1): 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is partially sponsored by the National Science Council (NSC) of Taiwan, R.O.C. under Grant No: 96-2416-H-606-002-MY2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chyan Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yang, C., Chen, LC. (2009). On Using Organizational Knowledge Capabilities to Assist Organizational Learning. In: King, W. (eds) Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Annals of Information Systems, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics