Skip to main content

What is the Source of Likeness?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Life as Its Own Designer

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 4))

  • 698 Accesses

In the previous chapter we attempted to convince the reader that horizontal communication constitutes the background for a coherent whole called the planetary organism. Nonetheless, it does not make sense to talk about a planetary network of living beings without taking a closer look on their individuality. Here we shall deal with a selfhood of individualized organisms, species, and lineages. We encounter the problem especially through the concept of homology, which points towards qualities shared amongst groups of organism as well as to the features that characterizes groups. We enter the area of some 250 years of intensive research during which reputable schools have risen and fallen, and endless battles – often furious – have been fought (sometimes ridiculous ones – and not just from our Whig perspective). The central question behind such a long-lasting intellectual surge is ostensibly simple: why do organisms share corresponding body parts?

[I]t was believed – and in part is still believed today – that we can build up the organism through recourse to its elementary constituents without first having grasped its building plan, i.e. the essence of organism, in its fundamental structure and without keeping this structure in view as that which guides the construction. [ … ] And yet it is a fundamental deception to believe that the effective power behind the transformation of contemporary biology is a matter of newly discovered facts. Fundamentally and primarily it is our approach to the question and our way of seeing that has been transformed – and in accordance with this the facts. This transformation of seeing and questioning is always the decisive thing in science. The greatness and vitality of science is revealed in the power of its capacity for such transformation.

Heidegger 1995, 260–261

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that Geoffroy’s “analogue” is comparable to Owen’s “homologue” (see below).

  2. 2.

    Epigenetic ways in which structures can emerge will be discussed in the next chapter.

  3. 3.

    Inquilines are inhabitants, symbionts of ant or termite hills.

  4. 4.

    See Ho (1993) regarding such coherent communication “across many octaves”.

  5. 5.

    All of us have learnt that the synthesis of urea in 1828 was a break-point – a true scientific victory showing that both organic and inorganic realms are essentially the same. That rational morphology was also flourishing at the time and demonstrating that they are different is mentioned only scarcely, and not many biologists are aware of its existence. Why the first event deserves mentioning in textbooks even today is a puzzle – except that authors tend to copy such phrases from older books.

  6. 6.

    A very curious conclusion, for we all learn in school that the idea that “matter does not matter” is the creed of certain mystical or “idealist” figures known as notorious opponents of true scientific knowledge. Here we see that the same characteristic fits science even better. Hence the very controversial status of scientific “materialism”.

  7. 7.

    All kinds of physiological processes – from metabolism and regulation to information processing – are understood in terms of levels and cogwheels, regardless of the obvious fact that no structures with physical properties adequate to such types of interaction seem to exist.

  8. 8.

    Only recently do we experience this shape-and-matter relation in artifacts such as microprocessors, nanotechnologies, special surfaces, etc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Markoš .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Markoš, A., Grygar, F., Hajnal, L., Kleisner, K., Kratochvíl, Z., Neubauer, Z. (2009). What is the Source of Likeness?. In: Life as Its Own Designer. Biosemiotics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9970-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics