Skip to main content

Causal Completeness in General Probability Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 347))

Abstract

A general probability space is defined to be causally complete if it contains common cause type variables for all correlations it predicts between compatible variables that are causally independent with respect to a causal independence relation defined between variables. The problem of causal completeness is formulated explicitly and several propositions are presented that spell out causal (in)completeness of certain classical and non-classical probability spaces with respect to a causal independence relation that is stronger than logical independence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arntzenius, F. (1993), The common cause principle, PSA 1992 2, 227–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, J. (1989), A space-time approach to the Bell inequality, In J. Cushing and E. McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 114–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1987), How to tell a common cause: Generalization of the conjunctive fork criterion. In J. H. Fetzer (ed.), Probability and Causality, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, B. V. (1977), The pragmatics of explanation. American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, B. V. (1982), Rational belief and the common cause principle, In R. McLaughlin (ed.), What? Where? When? Why? Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, B. V. (1989), The Charybdis of realism: Epistemological implications of Bell’s Inequality, In J. Cushing and E. McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyenis, B. (2005), On formal, purely probabilistic theories of evidence, Masters Research Paper, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyenis, B. and Rédei, M. (2004), When can statistical theories be causally closed?, Foundations of Physics 34, 1285–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haag, R. (1992), Local Quantum Physics. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer-Szabó, G. and Rédei, M. (2004), Reichenbachian Common Cause Systems, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43, 1819–1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer-Szabó, G. and Rédei, M. (2006), Reichenbachian common cause systems of arbitrary finite size exist, Foundations of Physics Letters 35, 745–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer-Szabó, G., Rédei, M. and Szabó, L. (1999), On Reichenbach’s common cause principle and Reichenbach’s notion of common cause, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer-Szabó, G., Rédei, M. and Szabó, M. (2000a), Common cause completability of classical and quantum probability spaces, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 39, 913–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer-Szabó, G., Rédei, M. and Szabó, L. (2000b), Reichenbach’s common cause principle: Recent results and open questions, Reports on Philosophy 20, 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Placek, T. (2000a), Is Nature Deterministic? Cracow: Jagellonian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Placek, T. (2000b), Stochastic outcomes in branching space-time. An analysis of Bell theorems, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51, 445–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rédei, M. (1995a), Logical independence in quantum logic, Foundations of Physics 25, 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rédei, M. (1995b), Logically independent von Neumann lattices, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 34, 1711–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rédei, M. (1997), Reichenbach’s common cause principle and quantum field theory, Foundations of Physics 27, 1309–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rédei, M. (1998), Quantum Logic in Algebraic Approach, Vol. 91 of Fundamental Theories of Physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rédei, M. (2002), Reichenbach’s common cause principle and quantum correlations, In T. Placek and J. Butterfield (eds.), Modality, Probability and Bell’s Theorems, Vol. 64 of NATO Science Series, II. Dordrecht: Kluwer pp. 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rédei, M. and Summers, S. (2002), Local primitive causality and the common cause principle in quantum field theory, Foundations of Physics 32, 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rédei, M. and Summers, S. (2005), Remarks on causality in relativistic quantum field theory, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 44, 1029–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rédei, M. and Summers, S. (2007), Quantum probability theory, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38, 390–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1956), The Direction of Time. Los Angeles MA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. (1978), Why ask “Why?”? Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 51, 683–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. (1980), Probabilistic causality, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61, 50–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1984), Common cause explanation, Philosophy of Science 51, 212–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1988), The principle of the common cause, In J. Fetzer (ed.), Probability and Causality. Boston MA: Reidel, pp. 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (2001), Venetian sea levels, British bread prices, and the principle of common cause, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52, 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, W. (1991), On Reichenbach’s principle of the common cause, In W. Salmon and G. Wolters (eds.), Logic, Language and the Structure of Scientific Theories, Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, S. (1990), Bell’s inequalities and quantum field theory, In Quantum Probability and Applications V., Vol. 1441 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, pp. 393–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1970), A Probabilistic Theory of Causality. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uffink, J. (1999), The principle of the common cause faces the Bernstein paradox, Philosophy of Science, Supplement 66, 512–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balazs Gyenis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gyenis, B., Rédei, M. (2011). Causal Completeness in General Probability Theories. In: Suárez, M. (eds) Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics. Synthese Library, vol 347. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9904-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics