Skip to main content

Collaborative Learning as Part of Adaptive Management of Forests Affected by Deer

  • Chapter

Adaptive management requires the merger of management with science to provide robust knowledge about the effect of management actions. It can also be applied as a model of collaborative learning to support effective resource management. Using the example of adaptive management of native forests affected by introduced deer in New Zealand, we set out to identify some of the tensions that become apparent when adaptive management is applied in this way. We describe the process of adaptive management as it was applied in this case study. Drawing from project documentation and participant reflections on the learning process, we highlight three key lessons: (1) the need to create ‘space’ — i.e. a permissive environment that allows for an evolving process rather than a formalised and legalistic one; (2) that adaptive management cannot be expected to progress in a standardised way but instead, role clarity will emerge over time and this will contribute to an emerging vision of contribution that participants see for their project; and (3) the collaborative learning component of adaptive management poses a new challenge for science as rather than providing solutions to management issues, scientists contribute technical expertise and methods as part of the management of an issue or situation of interest. We show that these tensions decrease with time and that the collaborative learning process in this project lead to new understanding of forests for most participants. Moreover, the inclusion of shared learning as a primary objective of the project improved the relationships between participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, R. B., Payton, I. J., & Knowlton, J. E. (1984). Effects of ungulates on structure and species composition in the Urewera forests as shown by exclosures. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 7, 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. (1979). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt, D. W. (1997). A Conceptual Introduction to Modelling: Qualitative and Quantitative Perspectives. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, L. E., Geisler, C. C., Schellas, J., & Wollenberg, E. (2001). Biological Diversity: Balancing Interests Through Adaptive Collaborative Management. Florida: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley, G. (1989). New Zealand plant-herbivore ecosystems past and present. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 12, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challies, C. N. (1985). Establishment, control, and commercial exploitation of wild deer in New Zealand. Royal Society of New Zealand Bulliten, 22, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990's. Journal of the Operation Research Society, 36(9), 757–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomes, D. A., Allen, R. B., Forsyth, D. M., & Lee, B. (2003). Factors preventing the recovery of New Zealand forests following control of invasive deer. Conservation Biology, 17(2), 450–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Conservation. (2001). Department of Conservation Policy Statement on Deer Control. Retrieved 5 March, 2002, from http://www.doc.govt.nz/Conservation/002~Animal-Pests/ Policy-Statement-on-Deer-Control/index.asp.

  • Eden, C. (1988). Cognitive mapping. European Journal of Operational Research, 36, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, J. E., Rixecker, S. S., & Hickling, G. J. (2003). The role of ethics on the management of New Zealand's wild mammals. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 361–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. M. (2005). Protocol for Estimating Changes in the Relative Abundance of Deer in New Zealand Forests Using the Faecal Pellet Index (FPI). Lincoln, New Zealand: Landcare Research contract report LC0506/027 to the Department of Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O. & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 13(12), 1881–1885.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Husheer, S. W. & Robertson, A. W. (2005). High-intensity deer culling increases growth of mountain beech seedlings in New Zealand. Wildlife Research, 32, 273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, C., Hughey, K. F. D., Allen, W. A., Rixecker, S., & Carter, R. W. (In press). Towards more reflexive use of adaptive management. Society and Natural Resources, In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, C. L. (2007). Towards Improving the Practice of Adaptive Management in the New Zealand Conservation Sector. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M., Brown, V. A., & Dyball, R. (2005). Social Learning in Environmental Management: Building a Sustainable Future. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kootnz, T. M. & Bodine, J. (2008). Implementing ecosystem management in public agencies: Lessons from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service. Conservation Biology, 22(1), 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendis-Millard, S. & Reed, M. G. (2007). Understanding community capacity using adaptive and reflexive research practices: Lessons from two Canadian Biosphere Reserves. Society and Natural Resources, 20, 543–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, G., Fraser, K. W., Asher, G. W., & Tustin, K. G. (2001a). Advances in New Zealand Mammalogy 1990–2000: Deer. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 31(1), 263–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, G., Fraser, W., & Sweetapple, P. (2001b). Top down or bottom up? Comparing the impacts of introduced arboreal possums and ‘terrestrial’ ruminants on native forests in New Zealand. Biological Conservation, 99, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, J., Robley, A., Forsyth, D., & Choquenot, D. (2006). Adaptive management experiments in vertebrate pest control in New Zealand and Australia. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34(1), 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, L. & Armitage, D. R. (2007). Charting the new territory of adaptive co-management: A Delphi study. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, D. & Veltman, C. J. (2005). Predicting the effects of perturbations on ecological communities: What can qualitative models offer? Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 905–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, J. (1990). The Merger of Knowledge with Power: Essays in Critical Science. London: Mansell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, B. & Cheek, A. (1999). Integrating citizens in adaptive management: A propositional analysis. Conservation Ecology, 3(1), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., & Reed, M. S. (2006). Unpacking “participation” in adaptive management of socio-ecological systems: A critical review. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. T., & Stewart, G. H. (1980). Comparison of forest structure and regeneration on Bench and Stewart Islands, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 3, 50–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. T. & Stewart, G. H. (1982). The effects of introduced wild animals on New Zealand forests. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72(3), 372–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., et al. (2002). Resilience management in socio-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6(1), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerden, G. (2006). Adaptive management planning projects as conflict resolution processes. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. (1986). Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C., Korman, J., Stevens, L. E., & Gold, B. (2000). Ecosystem modelling for evaluation of adaptive management policies in the Grand Canyon. Conservation Ecology, 4(2), Article 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J., & Holling, C. S. (1990). Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing? Ecology, 71(6), 2060–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, D. A., Barker, R. J., Yeates, G. W., Bonner, K. I., & Ghani, A. (2001). Introduced browsing mammals in New Zealand natural forests: Aboveground and belowground consequences. Ecological Monographs, 71, 587–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollenberg, E., Edmunds, D., & Buck, L. (2000). Using scenarios to make decisions about the future: Anticipatory learning for the adaptive co-management of community forests. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacobson, C. et al. (2009). Collaborative Learning as Part of Adaptive Management of Forests Affected by Deer. In: Allan, C., Stankey, G.H. (eds) Adaptive Environmental Management. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9632-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics