Skip to main content

Popper's Communitarianism

  • Conference paper
Book cover Rethinking Popper

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 272))

In this chapter, I argue that Karl Popper was a communitarian philosopher. This will surprise some readers. Liberals often tout Popper as one of their champions. Indeed, there is no doubt that Popper shared much in common with liberals. However, I will argue that Popper rejected a central, though perhaps not essential, pillar of liberal theory, namely, individualism. This claim may seem to contradict Popper's professed methodological individualism. Yet I argue that Popper was a methodological individualist in name only. In fact, methodological individualism faded from Popper's vocabulary as he moved institutions and situational analysis more firmly to centre-stage. Popper's focus on institutions and situations constitutes what I call his communitarianism. If my interpretation is correct, then theorists in the socio logy of scientific knowledge and communitarian epistemology should reconsider their long-standing distrust of Popper's philosophy. Indeed, they may have much to gain by treating Popper as a friend rather than a foe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackermann, Robert John. 1976. The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph. 1975. Institutional Individualism. The British Journal of Sociology 26(2): 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel. 1993. Communitarianism and Its Critics. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David. 1974. Popper's Mystification of Objective Knowledge. Science Studies 4(1): 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David. 1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery (second edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David. 1997. Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David. 2004. Institutions and Rule-Scepticism: A Reply to Martin Kusch. Social Studies of Science 34(4): 593–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David. 2007. Epistemic Grace: Antirelativism as Theology in Disguise. Common Knowledge 13(2–3): 250–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Matthew J. 2008. Comment: ‘Popper's Communitarianism’. Commentary presented to the Canadian Philosophical Association, June 3rd, 2008, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, A. F. 1985. Methodological Individualism: An Incongruity in Popper's Philosophy. In Popper and the Human Sciences, eds. Gregory Currie and Alan Musgrave, 73–87. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranston, Maurice. 1967. Liberalism. In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vols. 3 and 4, ed. Paul Edwards, 458–661. London: Macmillan and Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, Raymond. 2001. History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, Raymond. 2005. Neither History nor Praxis. In Outside Ethics, idem., 29–39. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, Paul Edward. 1999. After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John N. 1976. The Liberalism of Karl Popper. Government and Opposition 11: 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, Amy. 1985. Communitarian Critics of Liberalism. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(3): 308–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herf, Jeffrey. 1984. Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Culture in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, Martin. 2002. Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, Martin. 2004a. Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch Debate Revisited. Social Studies of Science 34(4): 571–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, Martin. 2004b. Reply to My Critics. Social Studies of Science 34(4): 615–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will. 1989. Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality. Ethics 99(4): 883–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessnoff, Michael. 1980. The Political Philosophy of Karl Popper. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10(1): 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven 1970. Methodological Individualism Reconsidered. In Sociological Theory and Philosophical Analysis, eds. Dorothy Emmet and Alasdair MacIntyre, 76–88. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, Bryan. 1973. Karl Popper. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1960. Breaking the Chains of Reason. In Out of Apathy, ed. Edward Palmer Thompson, 195–240. London: Stevens & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, Stephen. 1987. The Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 28(2): 269–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, Alan. 1974. The Objectivism of Popper's Epistemology. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper (vol. one), ed. Paul Arthur Schilpp, 560–596. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Patrick and David Paris. 1990. Liberalism and the Communitarian Critique: A Guide for the Perplexed. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 23(3): 419–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hear, Anthony. 1980. Karl Popper. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1961. The Poverty of Historicism (third edition). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1965. Conjectures and Refutations (second edition). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies, 2 vols (fifth edition). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1969. A Pluralist Approach to the Philosophy of History. In Roads to Freedom: Essays in Honour of Friedrich A. von Hayek, ed. Erich Streissler, 181–200. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1972. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinton, Anthony. 1975. Karl Popper: Politics Without Essences. In Contemporary Political Thinkers, eds. Anthony de Crespigny and Kenneth Minogue, 147–167. New York: Dodd, Mead and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1985. Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(3): 223–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Alan. 1985. Popper and Liberalism. In Popper and the Human Sciences, eds. Gregory Currie and Alan Musgrave, 89–104. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenbach, Sibyl A. 1991. Rawls, Hegel, and Communitarianism. Political Theory 19(4): 539–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, Jeremy. 2001. Popper and Classical Liberalism. Economic Affairs, December: 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer, Harald 2006. Popper and Communitarianism: Ethical and Political Dimensions of Democracy. In Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, Vol. 1, eds. Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford and David Miller, 231–240. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Geoffrey. 1998. Popper: Philosophy, Politics and Scientific Method. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1979. Atomism. In Powers, Possessions, and Freedom, ed. Alkis Kontons, 39–61. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1982. The Diversity of Goods. In Utilitarianism and Beyond, eds. Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams, 129–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1989. Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate. In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Nancy L. Rosenblum, 159–182. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udehn, Lars. 2001. Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kochan, J. (2009). Popper's Communitarianism. In: Parusniková, Z., Cohen, R.S. (eds) Rethinking Popper. Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science, vol 272. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics