Abstract
One way to evaluate and compare rival but potentially incompatible theories that account for the same set of observations is coherence. In this paper we take the quantitative notion of theory coherence as proposed by Kwok et al. (Proceedings of the Fifth Pacific Rim Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 553–564, 1998) and broaden its foundations. The generalisation will give a measure of the efficacy of a sub-theory as against single theory components. This also gives rise to notions of dependencies and couplings to account for how theory components interact with each other. Secondly we wish to capture the fact that not all components within a theory are of equal importance. To do this we assign weights to theory components. This framework is applied to game theory and the performance of a coherentist player is investigated within the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Axelrod, R. (1981), ‘The evolution of cooperation’, Science, 211(4489): 1390–1396.
Craig, W. (1953), ‘On axiomatizability within a system’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 18: 30–32.
van Fraassen, B. (1980), The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 14–19.
Gardenfors, P. (1988), Knowledge In Flux, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hawking, S.W. (2001), The Universe in a Nutshell, Bantam Books, New York.
Kwok, R.B.H., Nayak, A.C., Foo, N. (1998), ‘Coherence measure based on average use of formulas’, in Proceedings of the Fifth Pacific Rim Conference on Artificial Intelligence, LNCS, vol. 1531, Springer Verlag, pp. 553–564.
Kwok, R.B.H., Foo, N., Nayak, A.C. (2003), ‘The coherence of theories’, in Proceedings of the 18th Joint International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI03, Acapulco, Mexico, August 2003.
Kwok, R.B.H., Foo, N., Nayak, A.C. (2007), ‘Coherence of laws’, UNSW Computer Science and Engineering Technical Report, Number: UNSW-CSE-TR-0719, October 2007. ftp://ftp.cse.unsw.edu.au/pub/doc/papers/UNSW/0719.pdf.
Nagel, E. (1961), Structure of Science, Harcourt.
Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P. (1991), ‘Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture’, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’91), pp. 473–484.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, J.J., Kwok, R.B.H., Foo, N.Y. (2009). The Coherence of Theories—Dependencies and Weights. In: Makinson, D., Malinowski, J., Wansing, H. (eds) Towards Mathematical Philosophy. Trends in Logic, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9084-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9084-4_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9083-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9084-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)