Abstract
Calls for reform in education abound in a climate of rapid change. Research evidence, however, suggests that fundamental, sustainable, and widely spread change is inherently difficult to achieve. The challenge is augmented by dilemmas in the realization of ambitious goals, and the fact that science education does not operate in isolation, but is nested within schools and societal institutions. Based on cases of change in different educational contexts, issues persist and keep reemerging. Yet, despite not fully realized expectations, past attempts left imprints which gradually accumulated into significant contributions. While aware that schools and teachers need stability, the main message is that to rejuvenate and enhance science education continuously, change is a desired permanent state that should become the norm.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arzi, H. J. (1988). From short- to long-term: Studying science education longitudinally. Studies in Science Education, 15, 17–53.
Arzi, H. J. (1998). Enhancing science education through laboratory environments: More than walls, benches and widgets. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 595–608). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Arzi, H. J. (2007). Travels in and between practice and research. In K. Tobin & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), The culture of science education: Its history in person (pp. 289–300). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Baird, J. R. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study. European Journal of Science Education, 8, 263–282.
Beasley, W., & Butler, J. (2002, July). Implementation of context-based science within the freedoms offered by Queensland schooling. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Townsville, Queensland.
Bennett, J., Holman, J., Lubben, F., Nicolson, P., & Otter, C. (2005). Science in context: The Salters approach. In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant: Context-based learning of science (pp. 121–153). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 999–1015.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91, 347–370.
Black, P. (2003). Testing, testing: Listening to the past and looking to the future. School Science Review, 85(311), 69–77.
Burke, W. W. (2008). Organization change: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Burris, C. C., Wiley, E., Welner, K. G., & Murphy, J. (2008). Accountability, rigor, and detracking: Achievement effects of embracing a challenging curriculum as a universal good for all students. Teachers College Record, 110, 571–607.
Butler, J. (1995). Teachers judging standards in senior science subjects: Fifteen years of the Queensland experiment. Studies in Science Education, 26, 135–157.
Clarke, E. (1987). Assessment in Queensland secondary schools: Two decades of change, 1964–1983 (Historical Perspectives on Contemporary Issues in Queensland Education No. 4). Brisbane, Queensland: Department of Education.http://education.qld.gov.au/library/edhistory/topics/assess
Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.
Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119–142.
Cronbach, L. J. (1989). Lee J. Cronbach. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 8, pp. 64–93). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1890–1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Cuban, L. (2009). Hugging the middle – How teachers teach in an era of testing and accountability. New York: Teachers College Press.
Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York: Modern Library. Retrieved July 16, 2008, from http://www.brocku.ca/MeadProject/Dewey/Dewey_1922/Dewey1922_24.html
Dudley, R., & Luxton, P. (2008, September). The development of the P–12 assessment policy in Queensland, Australia. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, Cambridge, UK.
Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 1–26.
Fensham, P. J. (2008). Science education policy-making: Eleven emerging issues. Paris: UNESCO.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 957–976.
Goodlad, J. I. (2007). Foreword: A tale of lost horizons. In C. Kridel & R. V. Bullough, Jr. (Ed.), Stories of the Eight-Year Study: Reexamining secondary education in America (pp. ix–xiv). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Jackson, P. W. (1992). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 3–40). New York: Macmillan.
King, D., Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2008). Making connections: Learning and teaching chemistry in context. Research in Science Education, 38, 365–384.
Kridel, C., & Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2007). Stories of the Eight-Year Study: Reexamining secondary education in America. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Labaree, D. F. (2004). The Ed school’s romance with progressivism. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers in education policy (pp. 89–112). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
LeTendre, G. K., Hofer, B. K., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 43–89.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88
Millar, R. (2005). Contextualized science courses: Where next? In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant: Context-based learning of science (pp. 323–346). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Mitchell, I. (2008). 24 years of PEEL – Have the goalposts shifted? PEEL Seeds, 100, 11–22.
National Research Council. (2006). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Noddings, N. (2007). When school reform goes wrong. New York: Teachers College Press.
Pearsall, J. (Ed.). (1998). The new Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Redefer, F. L. (1950). The Eight Year Study …. after eight years. Progressive Education, 28(2), 33–36.
Sarason, S. B. (2002). Education reform: A self-scrutinizing memoir. New York: Teachers College Press.
Schwab, J. J. (1978). The “impossible” role of the teacher in progressive education. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays, Joseph J. Schwab (pp. 167–183). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Reprinted from School Review, 67, 139–159, 1959.)
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sugrue, C. (Ed.). (2008). The future of educational change: International perspectives. London: Routledge.
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31, 453–479.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future (Australian Education Review No. 51). Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.
White, R. (2003). Changing the script for science education. In R. Cross (Ed.), A vision for science education: Responding to the work of Peter Fensham (pp. 170–183). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
White, R. T., & Mitchell, I. J. (1994). Metacognition and the quality of learning. Studies in Science Education, 23, 21–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arzi, H.J. (2012). Change – A Desired Permanent State in Science Education. In: Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9040-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9041-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)