Abstract
This paper presents a method to evaluate the efficiency of industrial processes in comparison with, or to validate, best available techniques (BAT). The approach can be used as decision support in applying environmental regulations as well as to put in place an environmental management accounting system.
The European Directive 96/61/EC 24 September 1996 on integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) integrates environmental protection by a process of licensing all industrial activities at the European level. The objective of this directive is to reach a coherent level of environmental performance through the use of BAT.
Twelve considerations are given in Appendix IV of the IPPC directive for BAT selection which was adopted as French environmental regulations. Since these complicated concepts were put into practice some type of decision aid or support is necessary for the industries concerned. To clarify the meaning of each aspect and to better evaluate techniques, a study was carried out based on a questionnaire. This endeavour gave rise to a selection method. The results show a possible lack of homogeneity and inaccuracy in the considerations of the IPPC directive. The study also established seven objectives to be taken into account when selecting the BAT. For each objective, criteria, indicators and measurement parameters were determined. Finally, the suggested method could be used to assess relevant options for the continuous improvement of BAT or cleaner production implementation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Arrêté (2004). du 29 juin 2004 relatif au bilan de fonctionnement pris en application de l’article 17-2 du décret n 77-1133 du 21 septembre 1977 modifié (JO du 14 octobre 2000) Decree related to the assessment of industrial function (only in French).
Bailly, G. (2001, October 19). Rôle des différents participants aux travaux d’élabouration des BREF Colloque AFITE Paris.
Bartaire, J. G. (2001, October 19). Le rôle d’un représentant dans l’industrie au sein de l’exercice BAT Colloque AFITE Paris. (only in French).
de Chefdebien, H. (2001). BAT—BREF—IPPC ou encore MTD: les «Meilleures Techniques Disponibles» TSM July–August, 7–8 95–105 (available only in French).
Circulaire du 6 décembre 2004 relative au bilan de fonctionnement—Installations classées— Application de l’arrêté du 29 juin 2004 (only in French).
Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, JO n L257 of 10 October 1996, 0026–0040.
The principles of French regulation. Retrieved June 2006, from http://aida.ineris.fr/sommaires_textes/action_publique/cadre_action_publique.htm (only in French).
Hey, C. (2000, April 6–7). Balancing participation in technical working groups: The case of the information exchange of the IPPC directive. Paper presented at European conference on The Sevilla process: A driver for environmental performance in industry, Stuttgart, pp. 33–38.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis—an introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Litten, D. (2002, April 25–26). Best Available Techniques (BAT) and BAT reference documents. Paper presented at international IPPC conference, Seville.
Lucarelli, L. (2003). A primer on environmental management accounting. Focus Report, Business and the Environment, 14(3), 1–3.
Lucas, P. (2000, April 6–7). French expectations concerning IPPC directive and reference documents on Best Available Technologies (BREF). Paper presented at European conference on The Sevilla process: A driver for environmental performance in industry, Stuttgart, pp. 33–38.
Maystre (1999). Aide à la négociation multicritère—Pratiques et conseils, Collection Gérer l’environnement Presses Polytechniques et universitaires romandes (only in French).
MEDEF (2006, June). Guide du MEDEF, prévention et réduction intégrée de la pollution: le bon usage des BREF Direction des affaires économiques, financiers et fiscales (only in French).
Ordonnance n 2000-914 du 18 septembre 2000 relative à la partie Législative du code de l’environnement, JO du 21 septembre 2000, Livre I: Dispositions communes (only in French).
Russ, M. (1997). Linking cleaner production and ISO 14001 environmental management systems in New Zealand. In R. Hillary (Ed.), Environmental management systems and cleaner production (pp. 107–116).
Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., & Burritt, R. (2006). Sustainability accounting and reporting. Dordrecht: Springer.
UNEP (1994). Government strategies and policies for cleaner production UNEP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laforest, V. (2008). Applying Best Available Techniques in Environmental Management Accounting: From the Definition to an Assessment Method. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R.L., Jasch, C. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8912-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8913-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)