This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bloxham, S., & West, A. (2004). Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students’ conceptions of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 712–733.
Braddock, R., Lloyd-Jones, R., & Schoer, L. (1963). Research in written composition. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
Burke, E. (1759). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful, 2nd ed. London: Dodsley. (Facsimile edition 1971. New York: Garland).
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.), (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 2 (4)). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (Eds.), (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R., & Lewis, R. (1998). Planning and implementing assessment. London: Kogan Page.
Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Needham Heights, Mass: Allyn & Bacon.
Lloyd-Jones, R. (1977). Primary trait scoring. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
Meehl, P. E. (1996). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence (New Preface). Lanham, Md: Rowan & Littlefield/Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1954).
Morgan, C., Dunn, L., Parry, S., & O’Reilly, M. (2004). The student assessment handbook: New directions in traditional and online assessment. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 23–38.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Rust, C., Price, M., & O’Donovan, R. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 147–164.
Sadler, D. R. (1980). Conveying the findings of evaluative inquiry. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2(2), 53–57.
Sadler, D. R. (1981). Intuitive data processing as a potential source of bias in naturalistic evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3(4), 25–31.
Sadler, D. R. (1983). Evaluation and the improvement of academic learning. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 60–79.
Sadler, D. R. (1985). The origins and functions of evaluative criteria. Educational Theory, 35, 285–297.
Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13, 191–209.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 77–84.
Sadler, D. R. (2002). Ah! … So that’s ‘Quality’. In P. Schwartz & G. Webb (Eds.), Assessment: case studies, experience and practice from higher education (pp. 130–136). London: Kogan Page.
Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 175–194.
Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2004). Introduction to rubrics: an assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling, Va: Stylus Publishing.
Suskie, L. (2004). Assessing student learning: A common sense approach. Boston, Mass: Anker Publishing.
Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (1998). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. Etobicoke, Ontario: John Wiley.
Woolf, H. (2004). Assessment criteria: Reflections of current practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 51–493.
Acknowledgment
I am grateful to Gordon Joughin for his constant support and critical readings of different versions of this chapter during its development. His many suggestions for improvement have been invaluable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sadler, D.R. (2009). Transforming Holistic Assessment and Grading into a Vehicle for Complex Learning. In: Joughin, G. (eds) Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8904-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8905-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)