Skip to main content

Issues and Concepts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Future City ((FUCI,volume 2))

Abstract

There has been a considerable amount of research that defines and characterises the form of the sustainable city, and which urban forms may most affect sustainability. It is a complex issue. The physical dimensions of urban form may include its size, shape, land uses, configuration and distribution of open space – a composite of a multitude of characteristics, including a city’s transportation system and urban design features (e.g. Handy, 1996; Llewelyn-Davies, 2000). However, its sustainability depends on more abstract issues – environmental (including transport), social and economic. Research suggests that, not one, but a number of urban forms may be sustainable (Williams et al., 2000). Yet much of the debate about the sustainability of cities and urban forms has focused on increasing the density of development, ensuring a mix of uses, containing urban ‘sprawl’ and achieving social and economic diversity and vitality – often characterised as the concept of a ‘compact city’ (see Jenks et al., 1996; Jenks and Dempsey, 2005).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This forms part of the output from the CityForm: Sustainable Urban Form Consortium funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under its Sustainable Urban Environments Programme (Grant number GR/520529/01). Further details of the research and publications can be found at http://www.city-form.org/

References

  • Acioly, C. (2000) ‘Can Urban Management Deliver the Sustainable City?’ In Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries, (eds. M.Jenks and R.Burgess), Spon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARUP (2008) http://www.arup.com/eastasia/project.cfm?pageid=7047

  • Attwell, K. (2000) Urban land resources and urban planting – case studies from Denmark. Landscape & Urban Planning, 52, pp.145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badoe, D.A. and Miller, E.J. (2000) Transportation – Land-use Interaction: Empirical Findings in North America, and Their Implications for Modeling, Transportation Research Part D, 5, pp.235–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basantani, M. (2008) Plans for Foster’s Masdar Carbon Neutral City Debut, http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/02/06/plans-unveiled-for-worlds-first-zero-carbon-zero-waste-city-masdar-city/

  • Begg, I. (2001) Urban Competitiveness: Policies for dynamic cities, Policy Press, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet, M, and Crane, R. (2001) Travel by Design: The influence of urban form on travel, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolund, P. & Hunhammar, S. (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, pp.293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaiuto, M., Aiello, A., Perugini, M., Bonnes, M., and Ercolani, A.P. (1999) Multidimensional Perception of Residential Environment Quality and Neighbourhood Attachment in the Urban Environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, pp.331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G., Bartlett, W., and C. Lambert (1995) Planning, the Market and Private Housebuilding, UCL Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. & Watkins, C. (1996) Steering the Housing Market: new building and the changing planning system, The Policy Press, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. (1999) Housing market adjustment and land supply constraints. Environment & Planning A, 31(7), pp.1169–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G, Kirk, K. & Russell, J. (2001) Planning Central Scotland:The Role Of Infrastructure, Urban Form And New Development In Promoting Competitiveness And Cohesion. ESRC Cities Central Scotland Integrative Cities Study, Policy Discussion Paper (Revised), University of Glasgow, Dept of Urban Studies (website).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. & Morgan, J. (2002) Building Future Living Environments: The Role Of New Housing In Competitiveness And Cohesion. ESRC Cities Central Scotland Research Policy Paper for Communities Scotland and the Scottish Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. (2002) Housing supply and land use regulation. In Housing Economics and Public Policy, (eds. K.Gibb and A. O’Sullivan), Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breheny, M. (1995) Compact cities and transport energy consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 20(1), pp. 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., Harrison, C. and Limb, M. (1988) People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City. Urban Studies, 25, pp.455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E (2000a) The compact city: just or just compact? A preliminary analysis, Urban Studies 37(11), pp.1969–2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E. (2000b) The potential of the compact city in promoting social equity, in Achieving Sustainable Urban Form (eds. K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks) E & FN Spon, London, pp 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Architecture & the Built Environment (CABE) (2005) Better Neighbourhoods: Making higher densities work, CABE & the Corporation of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Architecture & the Built Environment (CABE) (2008) http://www.buildingforlife.org

  • Calthorpe, P. (1993) The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, community and the American dream, Princeton Architectural Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canmore Housing Association (2008) Slateford Green Housing, Edinburgh, http://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/slateford_green_housing.htm

  • Cannon, A. (1999) The significance of private gardens for bird conservation. Bird Conservation International, 9, pp.287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., de Magalhaes, C., Edwards, M., Awour, B. and Aminossehe, S. (2001) The Value of Urban Design, Report by the Bartlett School of Planning for CABE and DETR, Thomas Telford, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. (1998) The Transit Metropolis: A global inquiry, Island Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, P. and Sheppard, S. (1989) British planning policy and access to housing: some empirical estimates. Urban Studies, 26, 469–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1990) Green Paper on the Urban Environment, European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, V., Littlefair, P., Cooper, I. and McKennan, G. (1988). BR129: Daylighting as a Passive Solar Energy Option; an Assessment of its Potential in Non-Domestic Buildings, BRE, Garston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crookston, M., Clarke, P. and Averley, J. (1996) The compact city and the quality of life. In The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? (eds. M. Jenks, E. Burton and K. Williams,) E & FN Spon, London, p.135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curitiba websites:

    Google Scholar 

  • http://solstice.crest.org/sustainable/curitiba/

  • http://www.solutions-site.org/artman/publish/article_62.shtml

  • Dawson, R. (2004) Towards Good Practice in Sustainable urban Land Use, Bristol City Council, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2006a) Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing, The Stationary Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2006b) Sustainable Communities: Building for the Future, http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/sustainablecommunitiesbuilding

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2007) New eco-towns could help tackle climate change http://www.communities.gov.uk

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (2000a) Our Towns and Cities: The Future – Delivering and Urban Renaissance, Cm 4911 Urban White Paper, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (2001) Planning Policy Statement 13: Transport, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dongtan Development Co (2008) http://www.dongtan.biz/english/zhdt/plan.php

  • Duany, A. and Plater-Zyberk, E. (1992) The second coming of the American small town. Wilson Quarterly, 16, pp.3-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • English Partnerships (2007) Millennium Communities Programme, ENG0049, English Partnerships, Warrington, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. W. (1991) Rabbit hutches on postage stamps: planning, development and political economy. Urban Studies, 28(6), pp.853-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber Taylor, A., Wiley, A., Kuo, F. and Sullivan, W. (1998) Growing up in the inner city: Green Spaces as Places to Grow. Environment and Behavior, 30, pp.3-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster and Partners (2008) http://www.fosterandpartners.com/Projects/1515/Default.aspx

  • Gilbert, O.L. (1989) The Ecology of Urban Habitats. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. and Marvin, S. (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition, Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, S., Graham, S. & Marvin, S. (1997) Splintering networks: cities and technical networks in 1990s Britain. Urban Studies, 34(2), pp.191-216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, S. and Marvin, S. (2000) Models and Pathways: The Diversity of Sustainable Futures. In Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, (eds. K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks) E & FN Spon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S. (1996) Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behaviour, Transportation Research – D, 1(2), pp.151-165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henneberry, J. and Guy, S. (1999) Paper presented at ‘Property’ Colloquium of ESRC Cities Research Programme, Reading, May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government (1994) Sustainable Development: The UK Strategy, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M., Burton, E. and Wiliams, K.(eds) (1996) The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?, E & FN Spon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M. (2000) The acceptability of urban intensification, in Achieving Sustainable Urban Form (eds. K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks) E & FN Spon, London, pp 242-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M. and Burgess, R. eds (2000) Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries, Spon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M. and Dempsey, N. eds (2005) Future Forms and Design for Sustainable Cities, Architectural Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M., Kozak, D. and Takkanon, P. eds (2008) World Cities and Urban Form: Fragmented, Polycentric, Sustainable?, Routledge, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. (1994) The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community, McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig, A.P. & Grove, J.M. (2001) Urban-suburban ecology. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Vol. 5 (ed. S.A. Levin), Academic Press, San Diego pp. 733-745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozak, D. (2008) Assessing Urban Fragmentation: The emergence of new typologies in central Buenos Aires. In World Cities and Urban Form: Fragmented, Polycentric, Sustainable? (eds. M. Jenks, D. Kozak. and P. Takkanon), Routledge, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, R. (1977) Climate and building in Britain. A review of meteorological information suitable for use in the planning, design, construction and operation of buildings, Building Research Establishment Report, BRE, Garston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambregts, B and Zonneveld, W. (2003) Polynuclear Urban Regions and the Transnational Dimension of Spatial Planning, Delft University Press, Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, P. (1994) A Better Place to Live: Reshaping the American Suburb, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst: MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewelyn-Davies (1997) Sustainable Residential Quality: New Approaches to Urban Living, report for the GOL, DETR and LPAC, LPAC, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewelyn-Davies (2000) Urban Design Compendium, English Partnerships and The Housing Corporation, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, N. and Gleeson, B. eds (2003) Making Urban Transport Sustainable, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masnavi, M.-R. (2000) The new millennium and the new urban paradigm: the compact city in practice, in Achieving Sustainable Urban Form (eds. K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks) E & FN Spon, London, pp 64-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, S. and Whitehead, C. (2000) Restructuring Housing Systems: from social to affordable housing. York Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2004a) Planning Policy Guidance 3: Housing, ODPM, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2004b) Planning Policy Guidance 13: Transport, ODPM, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMA (2008) http://www.oma.eu

  • Owers, R. and Oliver, G. (2001) ‘Urban healing’, EcoTech Sustainable Architecture Today, 4, pp.28-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, R., Tassinary, L.G., Ulrich, R.S., Hebi, M.R. and Grossman-Alexander, M. (1998) The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, pp.113-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit, S. and Duhme, F. (2000) Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape & Urban Planning, 52, pp.1-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, L., Mowen, A. and Orsega-Smith, E. (2002) An Examination of Park Preferences and Behaviours Among Urban Residents: The Role of Residential Location, Race and Age. Leisure Sciences, 24, pp.181-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revill, J. and Davies, C. (2008) ‘Secret’ eco-town plans spark protest. The Observer, February 10, 2008 online: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/feb/10/communities.planning1?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront

  • Rudlin, D. and Falk, N. (1999) Building the 21 st Century Home: The Sustainable Neighborhood, Architectural Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savard, J-P.L., Clergeau, P. & Mennechez, G. (2000) Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 48, pp.131-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmie, J. (ed) (2001) Innovative Cities, Spon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmie, J., Wood, P. and Sennett, J. (2000) Innovation and clustering in the London Metropolitan Region. Paper presented to ESRC Symposium on ‘Urban Competitiveness’, South Bank University, April 2000, and reproduced in I. Begg (ed) (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, D. and Coombe, D. (2000) The transport implications of alternative urban forms, in Achieving Sustainable Urban Form (eds. K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks) E & FN Spon, London, pp 121-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjaeveland, O. and Garling, T. (1997) Effects of Interactional Space on Neighbouring. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, pp.181-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart Growth (2008) http://www.smartgrowth.org

  • Stead, D., Williams, J. and Titheridge, H. (2000) Land use, transport and people: identifying the connections. In Achieving Sustainable Urban Form (eds. K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks) E & FN Spon, London, pp 174-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. and Walters, S. (2001) Car Parking in Residential Development: Assessing the viability of design and sustainability in parking policy and layout. In RICS Foundation, The Cutting Edge 2001, RICS, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme, G., Fenton, D. and Coakes, S. (2001) Lot size, garden satisfaction and local park and wetland visitation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 56, pp.161-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, H.E.A., Tinsley, D.J. & Croskeys, C.E. (2002) Park Usage, Social Milieu, and Psychosocial benefits of Park Use Reported by Older Urban Park Users from Four Ethnic Groups. Leisure Sciences, 24, pp.199-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, C. (2008) Rem Koolhaas’ Ras Al Khaimah’s Eco City to rival Masdar http://arquitectura.pt/forum/f11/rem-koolhaas-ras-al-khaimah-s-eco-city-to-rival-masdar-9816.html

  • Tyrväinen, (1997). The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37(3-4), pp.211-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R.S. (1981) Natural versus Urban Scenes: Some Psychophysiological Effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, pp.523-556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R.S, Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A. & Zelson, M. (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, pp.201-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban Task Force (1999) Towards an Urban Renaissance, E & FN Spon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Diepen, A. (2000) Households and their Spatial-Energetic Practices: Searching for Sustainable Urban Forms, Netherlands Geographical Studies, Groningen, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, T., Asaeda, T. and Abu, E. (1998) Reductions in air conditioning energy caused by a nearby park. Energy and Buildings, 29(1), pp.83-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, R., Palmer, J., Kolokotroni, M. and Littlefair, P. (2002) The balance of the annual heating and cooing demand within the London urban heat island. Proceedings of Climate Change and the Built Environment, International Conf, CIB Task Group 21, Climate Data for Building Services, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.H. (1980) The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, Projects for Public Spaces, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., Burton, E. and Jenks, M. (Eds.) (2000) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, E & FN Spon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., Jenks, M and Burton, E. (1999) How much is too much? Urban intensification, social capacity and sustainable development. Open House International, 24(1), pp. 17-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Gazetteer (2005) http://www.world-gazetteer.com

  • Yannis, S. (1994) Solar Energy and Housing Design, Vol. 1: principles, objectives, guidelines, Architectural Association, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jenks, M., Jones, C. (2010). Issues and Concepts. In: Jenks, M., Jones, C. (eds) Dimensions of the Sustainable City. Future City, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8647-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8647-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8646-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8647-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics