Abstract
To have any relevance to development of a country’s agriculture and to the needs of small farmers, it is necessary for managers of Genetically Engineered (GE) crops to provide real life solutions to the problems inherent in these methods of producing food and fodder. Currently available GM crops are those that were developed for industrialized agriculture in developed countries, complete with their positive and negative traits. At least one of them, the Herbicide Tolerance (HT) trait, is not just irrelevant to our country’s needs, it is downright harmful to the agricultural and food systems that strengthen local food security. Using HT crops will reduce the demand for labor in a labor surplus country where agricultural operations such as weeding provide wages, especially for women; it will reduce food and nutrition availability for the poor by eliminating natural leafy greens, it will strike at human and veterinary health by destroying locally available medicinal plants, and it will increase risks of crop failure by making it impossible to engage in mixed cropping, which distributes risk and provides more food and nutrition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baorong, L., Zhiping, S., & Jiakuan, C. (2003). Can transgenic rice cause ecological risks through transgene escape? Progress in Natural Science, 13(1), 17.
Bennet, D. J. (1999). Ethical aspects of agricultural biotechnology (pp. 42–54). The Hague: Cambridge Biomedical Consultants.
Biotechnology Australia (2003). Agricultural biotechnology, herbicide tolerant crops in Australia. Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences.
Convention on Biological Diversity (1992). Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://www.cbd.int
Gressel, J. (2002). Preventing, delaying and mitigating gene flow from crops - Rice as an example. In The 7th international symposium on the biosafety of genetically modified organisms, Beijing (pp. 59–77). Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://www.isbr.info/symposia/docs/isbgmo.pdf
Mackenzie, R., Burhenne-Guilmin, F., La Vina, A. G. M., Werksman, J. D., Ascencio, A., Kinderlerer, J., et al. (2003). An explanatory guide to Cartagena protocol on biosafety. Cambridge: IUCN.
Nichterlein, K. (1997). Biotechnology advances in oil crops affecting coconut production. BINAS News, 3, 3–4.
Sahai, S., & Rahman, S. (2003). Mahyco-Monsanto’s Bt cotton fails to perform. Current Science, 85(4), 426–427.
Sharma, M., Charak, K. S., & Ramanaiah, T. V. (2003). Agricultural biotechnology research in India: Status and policies. Current Science, 84(3), 297–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sahai, S. (2008). The Social and Economic Impact of GM Crops: The Case of the Herbicide Tolerance Trait. In: Molfino, F., Zucco, F. (eds) Women in Biotechnology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8611-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8611-3_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8610-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8611-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)