Abstract
We present a transdisciplinary project aiming to face the controversial issue of transgenics. An analysis of the attitude of the scientific community, stakeholders and citizens, towards the techniques for gene transfer and for genetically modified food and feed is the core of our study. The most innovative aspect of our research is a survey that specifically focuses on the scientific community wherescientists’ attitudes concerning the techniques for gene transfer and their perception of related risks is assessed. In addition, the meaning of the development of ‘sustainable’ practices for gene transfer is discussed. We also report the results of a research conducted in the Trentino region (Italy) aiming to assess the risk perception of several actors and consumers’ willingness to buy genetically modified food. Finally, we point out the role of women scientists as crucial actors in the decision-making process concerning research, development and application.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beck, U. (2001). La società globale del rischio. Trieste: Asterios.
Castelfranchi, Y., & Pitrelli, N. (2007). Come si comunica la scienza? Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Dale, E. C., & Ow, D. W. (1991). Gene Transfer with Subsequent Removal of the Selection Gene from the Host Genome. PNAS USA, 88, 10558–10562.
Gaskell, G. et al. (2004). GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 24(1), 185–194.
Greco, P. (2005). Il Modello Venezia. La comunicazione nell’era post accademica della scienza. Retrieved September, 2006, from http://ics.sissa.it/conferences/csIntroduzione.pdf
Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998a). The public understanding of science. In G. Wilson et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Science communication (pp. 3–17). London: IOP.
Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998b). Science in public: Communication, culture, and credibility. New York: Plenum Press.
Hare, P. D., & Chua, N.-H. (2002). Excision of selectable marker genes from transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology, 20, 575–580.
Kieffer, F. et al. (2004). Mannose and xylose cannot be used as selectable agents for Vitis vinifera L. transformation. Vitis, 43, 35–39.
Marin, F., & Martinelli, L. (2006). The discrete choice analysis as a valuable tool for estimating consumer attitudes towards genetically modified food in Europe. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Public Communication on Science and Technology (PCST-9), Seoul, May 17–20, 2006.
Martinelli, L., & Mandolino, G. (1994). Genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic plants in grapevine (Vitis rupestris S.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 88, 621–628.
Martinelli, L., & Mandolino, G. (2001). Genetic transformation in Vitis. In: Y. P. S. Bajaj (Ed.), Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, transgenic crops II (Vol. 47, pp. 325–338). Berlin: Springer.
Martinelli, L. et al. (2002). Stable insertion and expression of the movement protein gene of Grapevine Virus A (GVA) in grape lines (Vitis rupestris S.). Vitis, 41, 189–193.
Martinelli, L. et al. (2005a). Genetically modified food and feed: Traceability and labeling in the public debate. Paper presented at the 9th International Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology Research (ICABR), Agricultural biotechnology, 10 years later, Ravello, July 6–10, 2005.
Martinelli, L. et al. (2005b). European regulation on traceability and labeling of genetically modified food and feed: Analysis on the public debate. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology–Animal, 2005, 1133.
Martinelli, L. et al. (2006). “Eco-friendly” genes: From scientific research to risk management, ethical issues and communication. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Public Communication on Science and Technology (PCST-9), Seoul, May 17–20, 2006.
McFadden, D. (1974a). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic.
McFadden, D. (1974b). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 303–328.
McFadden, D. (1981). Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In C. F. Manski & D. McFadden (Eds.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications (pp. 198–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McFadden, D. (2000). Economic choices. Nobel Prize Lecture, December 8, 2000. Retrieved September 15, 2007, from http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2000/mcfadden-lecture.pdf
McFadden, D., & Ruud, P. A. (1994). Estimation by simulation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 4, 591–608.
McFadden, D., & Train, K. (2000). Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 447–470.
Reed, J. et al. (2001). Phosphomannose isomerase: An efficient selectable marker for plant transformation. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 37, 127–132.
Sandman, P. M. (1999). Risk = Hazard + Outrage: Coping with controversy about utility risks. Engineering News-Records, October 4, A19–A23.
Savadori, L. et al. (2004). Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 1289–1299.
Scholderer, J., & Frewer, L. J. (2003). The biotechnology communication paradox: Experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 125–157.
Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 689–701.
Train, K. (Ed.) (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolt, J. D., & Peterson, R. K. D. (2000). Agricultural biotechnology and societal decision making: The role of risk analysis. AgBioForum, 3(1), 39–46.
Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zuo, J. et al. (2001). Chemical-regulated, site-specific DNA excision in transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology, 19, 157–161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martinelli, L., Marin, F. (2008). A Transdisciplinary Approach to Face the Plant Gene Transfer Technique: From Laboratory to Society. In: Molfino, F., Zucco, F. (eds) Women in Biotechnology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8611-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8611-3_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8610-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8611-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)