Abstract
With private patronage, the pressure grows to commercialize scientific research and its results. The business model extends into the laboratory, and applies also to communication. The author explores potential risks for science communication in this changing context. In product marketing and public relations, hyperbole and sensationalism are normal modes of operation. ‘Innocent fraud’ (Galbraith) and more ‘bullshit’ (Frankfurt) are likely risks with this communication practice, and those risks call for increased vigilance by knowledge consumers. The author points to some indicators of the growth of critical publics for science: the long-term waves of mass media coverage, the cycles of hype and disappointed expectations, increased scientific literacy, and the displacement of scientific ideology by sceptical and utilitarian attitudes in high-tech knowledge societies. In this context, the paradigm of science communication is no longer to deliver public acceptance, but to enhance public scrutiny of private scientific developments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bauer, M. W. (2007). The public career of ‘genes’–Trends in public sentiment from 1946 to 2002. New Genetics and Society, 26(1), 29–46.
Bauer, M. W. (2008). The fait accompli and its social influence.DIOGENE(UNESCO), 217, 68–83.
Bauer, M. W. & Bucchi, M. (Eds.) (2007). Journalism, science and society: Science communication between news and public relations. London: Routledge.
Bauer, M. W., Petkova, K., Boyadjieva, P. & Gornev, G. (2006). Long-term trends in the representations of science across the Iron Curtain: Britain and Bulgaria, 1946–95. Social Studies of Science, 36(1), 97–129.
Bauer, M.W. Ragnarsdottir, A., Rudolfsdottir, A. & Durant, J. (1995). Science and technology in the British press, 1946–1992. A systematic content analysis. London: Science Museum and Wellcome Trust.
Brown, N. & Michael, M. (2002). A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Retrieved on 8 October 2007 from http://www.york.ac.uk/org/satsu/OnLinePapers/NB/Brown,%20N.PDF.
Bucchi, M. & Mazzolini, R. G. (2007). Big science, little news: Science coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946–2007. In M. W. Bauer & M. Bucchi (Eds.), Journalism, science and society: Science communication between news and public relations. London: Routledge, 53–70.
Chang, B. H. & Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2005). Relative constancy of advertising spending. A cross-national examination of advertising expenditure and their determinants. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies, 67(4), 339–357.
Eurobarometer 63.1 (2005). Europeans, Science and Technology, Brussels, DG Research.
Frankfurt, H. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Franzen, M., Roedder, S. & Weingart, P. (2007). Fraud: Causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. EMBO Reports, 8(1), 3–7.
Galbraith, J. K. (2004). The economics of innocent fraud. London: Penguin Books.
Greenberg, D. S. (2007). Science for sale: The perils, rewards and delusions of campus capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Oeffentlichkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Haldane, J. B. S. (1925). Daedalus, or science and the future. London: Kegan & Co.
Kim, D.L. (2007). A study of Korea’s response to the prospect of stem cell technology: with reference to Hwang’s scandal. Unpublished graduate thesis, Department of Sociology, Yonsei University, July.
Krige, J. (2005). Critical reflections on the science–technology relationship. Transactions of the Newcomen Society, 76, 259–269.
Krimsky, S. (2003). Science in the private interest: How the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Mirowski, P. & Sent, E. M. (2005). The commercialization of science, and the response of STS. Draft version of chapter to appear in the New Handbook of STS. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
Nelkin, D. (1987). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2003). Mode 2 revisited. Minerva, 41, 179–194
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1992). Technology and the economy: The key relationships. Paris: OECD.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2004). Basic R&D statistics. Paris: OECD.
Powell, D. A., Blaine, K., Morris, S. & Wilson, J. (2003). Agronomic and consumer considerations for Bt and conventional sweet-corn. British Food Journal, 105(10), 700–713.
Shukla, R. & Bauer, M. W. (2007).The Science Culture Index (SCI)–Construction, validation and benchmarking across Europe and India. London and Delhi: LSE and National Council of Applied Economic Research (.pdf available from authors).
Sieferle, R. P. (1984).Fortschittsfeinde–Opposition gegen Technik und Industrie von der Romantik bis zur Gegenwart. Munichen, Verlag C.H. Beck.
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2004). Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Research Policy, 33, 709–733.
Touraine, A. (1995). The crisis of ‘Progress’. In M. Bauer (Ed.), Resistance to new technology–Nuclear power, information technology, biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–56.
Woolgar, S. (2004). Marketing ideas. Economy and Society, 33(4), 448–462
Ziman, J. (1995). Of one mind: The collectivisation of science. Washington DC: American Institute of Physics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bauer, M.W. (2008). Paradigm Change for Science Communication: Commercial Science Needs a Critical Public. In: Cheng, D., Claessens, M., Gascoigne, T., Metcalfe, J., Schiele, B., Shi, S. (eds) Communicating Science in Social Contexts. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8597-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8598-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)