Skip to main content

Techniques in Integrated Development and Implementation of Enterprose Information Systems

  • Chapter
Intelligent Knowledge-Based Systems

Abstract

Information technology is the important weapon to improve and keep an enterprises’ competitiveness in ever-changing business environment. It is a systematic methodology that is mostly required as a supporting tool achieving complicated activities connected with introduction of information systems. The information systems embodied to be impertinent can be wasting enterprise resources and weakening enterprise’s competitiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bacon, C. J. (1992), The use of decision criteria in selecting information systems/technology investments. MIS Quarterly, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. (1995), “The role of feedback in assessing information systems planning effectiveness,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 4. No. 1, pp. 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, A. (1998), A Practical Guide to Information Systems Strategic Planning, CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerpa, N., and Verner, J. M. (1998), The effect of IS maturity on information systems strategic planning, Information & Management, No. 34, pp. 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. (1992), “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 60–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1986), Out of The Crisis, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Stidy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, G. W., Leitheiser, R. L., and Wetherbe, J. C. (1984), Key information systems issues for the 1980’s, MIS Quarterly, Sep, pp. 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazlolahi, B., and Tanniru, M. R. (1991), “Selecting requirement determination methodology-contingency approach revisited,” Information & Management, No. 21, pp. 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galletta, D. F., Sampler, J. L., and Teng, J. T. (1999), “Strategies for integrating creativity principles into the systems development process,” Proceedings of the twenty–fifth Hawaii international conference on. 1999, pp. 268–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue, D. L. et al. (1992), “Strategic data planning: lessons from the field,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, J-K. (2001), “A study on the supporting methodology for implementing and evaluating e-Business packages,” Master thesis, Yonsei University, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, H. J. (1996), “Addressing the essential difficulties of software engineering, Journal of Systems Software, 32-2 (February), pp. 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.-W. (2001), “A Study on Requirements Analysis for Information Strategy Planning”, Master thesis, Yonsei University, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. T. (2001), “A study on enterprise information system investment evaluation,” Master thesis, Yonsei University, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, A. L., and Sethi, V. (1996), “Key prescriptions for strategic information systems planning,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 35–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leem, C.-S. (1999), ’99 Annual reports for evaluation of IS Performance, IT Research and consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leem, C.-S. (2000), ’00 Annual reports for evaluation of IS Performance, IT Research and consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leem, C. S., and Kim, I. “An Integrated Evaluation System based on the Continuous Improvement Model of IS Performance,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, will appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leem, C. S., and Kim, S. (2002), “Introduction to an integrated methodology for development and implementation of enterprise information systems,” TheJournal ofSystems and Software Vol. 60, pp. 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O. (1978), “Measuring Information Output: A Communication Systems Approach,” Information & Management, Vol. 1, No. 5, 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlan, F. W., McKenney, J. L., and Pyburn, P. (1983), The information archipelago-plotting a course, Harvard Business Review, Jan–Feb, pp. 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, B. L., Kappelman, L. A., and Prybutok, V. R. (1997), A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity ofthe Information Systems Function: Toward a Theory for Information Systems Assessment, Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 6–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, R. L., and Wetherbe, J. B. (1980), Toward A Comprehensive Framework for MIS Research, MIS Quarterly, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, B. (2001), “A Study on the Development of the Evaluation Framework for Information Strategic Planning,” Master thesis, Yonsei University, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S., and Robertson, J. (1999), “Mastering the requirements Process,” ADDISON WESLEY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C. S., and Jones, W. (1992), Measuring performance of the information systems function, Journal of Management Information Systems, pp. 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, P. B., and Kiew, M.-Y. (1994), “A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, Canada (ICIS 94), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart, W. A. (1931), Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product, D. VanNostrand Company, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, D. S. (1999), Stages in Information Systems Management, Handbook of IS Management, CRC Press LLC, pp. 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theo, J. W., and Berghout, E. W (1997), Methodologies for information systems investment evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review. Information and Software Technology 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, N. (1997), Beyond outsourcing: Managing IT resources as a value center, Saloan Management Review, spring, pp. 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadat, F. B. (1996), Enterprise Modeling and Integration: principles and applications, Champman & Hall, pp. 14–16, 317–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zani, W. M. (1970), “Blueprint for MIS”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 48, No. 6, 1970, pp. 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leem, C.S., Suh, J.W. (2005). Techniques in Integrated Development and Implementation of Enterprose Information Systems. In: Leondes, C.T. (eds) Intelligent Knowledge-Based Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7829-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7829-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7746-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7829-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics