Skip to main content

Abstract

In a design project, a great deal of information about the aspects of the product being developed and the progress of the project is exchanged during meetings. However, reports which constitute the formal records of meetings are often limited in the extent to which they capture the information exchange. New recording and facilitation technologies for meetings are improving but further work is needed to enable the efficient capture of knowledge and experience from the discourse. The work reported in this paper is part of a project, carried out jointly with Airbus UK, exploring how design experience and rationale can be captured from the discourse of design reviews. In particular, this paper will present a methodology to evaluate the knowledge lost from the formal record of design reviews based on a comparison between transcripts and official minutes. The interpretation of the results is based on a unique information mapping technique. It provides the research team with an essential visual tool reflecting the loss of useful design knowledge for each design issue identified during the meeting. All findings are based on an industrial case study and a survey on the requirements of practicing engineers in leading aerospace companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S.J. Yen. Capturing multimodal design activities in support of information retrieval and process analysis, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University(USA), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Huet, S.J. Culley, C.A. McMahon. A classification scheme for structure and content of design meetings, in Proceedings of Design 2004, D. Marjanovic(Ed.), The Design Society, 2004, pp. 1363–1369.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.G. Cooper. Winning at New Products. Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch, 2nd edition, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0201563819, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. CEI/IEC 1160: 1992. Formal design review, National Standards of Canada, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SAE AS9100 revision A: 2001. Quality systems — Aerospace — Model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and servicing, Society of Automotive Engineers, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.H. Bracewell, S. Ahmed, K.M. Wallace. DREAD and design folders, a way of capturing, storing and passing on, knowledge generated during design projects, in Proceedings of DETC’04, A.R. Parkinson(Ed.), American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Lee, K-Y. Lai. What’s in design rationale?, in Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, T.P. Moran, J.M. Carroll(Eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.P. Moran, J.M. Carroll. Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, ISBN 080581566X, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.R. Marsh. The capture and utilisation of experience in engineering design, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge(UK), 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.L. Derr. The concept of information in ordinary discourse, Information Processing & Management 21(6), 1985, 489–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D.B. Gordon, N. Sager. A method of measuring information in language, applied to medical texts, Information Processing & Management 21(4), 1985, 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Hoffmann. Defining information: An analysis of the information content of documents, Information Processing & Management 16, 1980, 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Little. I hate reviews!, Academy Sharing Knowledge Magazine, 10, 2004, available online only: http://appl.nasa.gov/ask/

  14. B.J. Streibel. The Manager’s Guide to Effective Meetings, McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0071391347, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Huet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huet, G., McMahon, C.A., Sellini, F., Culley, S.J., Fortin, C. (2007). Knowledge Loss in Design Reviews. In: Tichkiewitch, S., Tollenaere, M., Ray, P. (eds) Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering II. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6761-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6761-7_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6760-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6761-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics