This chapter deals with the role and influence of kinship on the decision to marry in a rural population of mid nineteenth century Italy. The reason for this choice lies in the particular social structure of that community, where the two most important social groups, sharecroppers and day laborers, had almost antithetic marriage patterns and family formation systems. Our study demonstrates the key role of kin, especially coresident ones, in modifying the risk of marriage. This situation was particularly pronounced within the large and complex sharecropping households. Constrained by the absolute necessity to maintain not only a balance between farm size and household size but also an adequate supply of labor within the household, sharecroppers posed limits and restrictions on marriages of members, especially men. Gender, age, and marital status were chief factors determining who could marry and when. On the other hand, day laborers were less sensitive to household structure as their activity depended neither on the household labor force nor on the characteristics of the farm. In this case, the access to marriage, ruled only by birth order, was less controlled for both men and women. As for the role of kin outside the household, difficulties in the reconstruction of the entire kin network made the results less conclusive. However, it was only effective in modifying the risk of marriage for women living in sharecropping households. Large and deep-rooted networks of relations favored a woman’s access to marriage, especially when a local man was involved, suggesting the use of marriage to establish and reinforce local family alliances.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alter, G., M. Neven, and M. Oris. 2000. Individuals, households and communities facing economic stresses: A comparison of two rural areas in 19th century Belgium, in M. Neven and C. Capron (eds.), Family structures, demography and population: A comparison of societies in Asia and Europe, Laboratoire de Démographie, Université de Liège, Liège, pp. 185–210.
Angeli, A. and A. Bellettini. 1979. Strutture familiari nella campagna bolognese a metà dell’Ottocento. Genus 35: 155–72.
Arioti, M. 1988. Non desiderare la donna d’altri. Gruppi sociali parentela e matrimonio nella comunità mezzadrile di Prodo. Angeli, Milan.
Barbagli, M. 1984. Sotto lo stesso tetto. Mutamenti della famiglia in Italia dal XV al XX secolo. Il Mulino, Bologna.
Barbagli, M. 1990. Sistemi di formazione della famiglia in Italia, in Società Italiana di Demografia Storica, Popolazione, società e ambiente. Temi di demografia storica italiana (secc. XVII-XIX), Clueb, Bologna, pp. 3–43.
Bengtsson, T., C. Campbell, J.Z. Lee et al. (eds.). 2004. Life Under Pressure: Mortality and Living Standards in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Berkner, L.K. and F. Mendels. 1978. Inheritance systems, family structure, and demographic patterns in Western Europe, 1700–1900, in C. Tilly (ed.), Historical studies of changing fertility, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 209–23.
Biagioli, G. 1986. La diffusione della mezzadria nell’Italia centrale: Un modello di sviluppo demografico ed economico. Bollettino di Demografia Storica 3: 59–66.
Breschi, M., R. Derosas, and M. Manfredini. 2004. Mortality and environment in three Emilian, Tuscan, and Venetian communities, 1800–1883, in T. Bengtsson, C. Campbell, J.Z. Lee (eds.), Life under pressure: Mortality and living standards in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900, MIT, Cambridge, pp. 209–52.
Breschi, M., M. Manfredini, and L. Pozzi. 2004. Mortality in the first years of life: Socio-economic determinants in an Italian nineteenth-century population, in M. Breschi and L. Pozzi (eds.), The determinants of infant and childhood mortality in Europe during the last two centuries, Forum, Udine, pp. 123–38.
Bourdieu, P. 1962. Celibat et condition paysanne. Études Rurales 5/6: 32–136.
Campbell, C. and J. Lee. 2003. Social mobility from a kinship perspective: Rural Liaoning, 1789–1909. International Review of Social History 48: 1–26.
Castro De Guerra, D., H. Arvelo, and J. Pinto-Cisternas. 1999. Population structure of two black Venezuelan populations studied through their mating structure and other related variables. Annals of Human Biology 26: 141–50.
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. and W. Bodmer. 1971. Human Population Genetics. Freeman, San Francisco.
Cocchi, D., D. Crivellaro, G. Dalla Zuanna, and R. Rettaroli. 1996. Nuzialità, famiglia e sistema agricolo in Italia, negli anni ‘80 del XIX secolo. Genus 52(1/2): 125–59.
Corsini, C.A. 2000. Introduction, in M. Neven and C. Capron (eds.), Family structures, demography and population: A comparison of societies in Asia and Europe, Laboratoire de Démographie, Université de Liège, Liège, pp. 1–11.
Crow, J.F. and A.P. Mange. 1965. Measurement of inbreeding from the frequency of marriages between persons of the same surname. Eugenics Quarterly 12: 199–203.
Da Molin, G. 1990. Family forms and domestic service in Southern Italy from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries. Journal of Family History 15: 503–27.
Das Gupta, M. 1997. Kinship systems and demographic regimes, in D. Kertzer and T. Fricke (eds.), Anthropological demography: Towards a new synthesis, Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 36–52.
Delille, G. 1985. Famille et proprieté dans le royaume de Naples (XV e–XIXe siècle). EHESS, Rome-Paris.
Della Pina, M. 1990. Famiglia mezzadrile e celibato: le campagne di Prato nei secoli XVII e XVIII, in Società Italiana di Demografia Storica, Popolazione, società e ambiente. Temi di demografia storica (secc. XVII–XIX), Clueb, Bologna, pp. 125–40.
Derosas, R. 2002. Si sposi chi può, resti chi deve: Matrimonio e relazioni familiari nella Venezia di metà Ottocento. Popolazione e Storia 1: 35–68.
Doveri, A. 1982. Famiglia coniugale e famiglia multinucleare: Le basi dell’esperienza domestica in due parrocchie delle colline pisane lungo il secolo XVIII. Genus XXXVIII(1/2): 59–95.
Doveri, A. 1990. Sposi e famiglie nelle campagne pisane di fine ’800. Un caso di matrimonio mediterraneo? in Società Italiana di Demografia Storica, Popolazione, società e ambiente. Temi di demografia storica italiana (secc. XVII-XIX), Clueb, Bologna, pp. 141–60.
Doveri, A. 2000. Land, fertility and family: A selected review of the literature in historical demography. Genus LVI(3/4): 19–59.
Dribe, M. and C. Lundh. 2005. Finding the right partner: Rural homogamy in nineteenth-century Sweden. International Review of Social History 50: 149–77.
Ehmer, J. 2002. Marriage, in D.I. Kertzer and M. Barbagli (eds.), Family life in the long nineteenth century, Yale University Press, New Haven/London, pp. 282–321.
Giorgetti, G. 1974. Contadini e proprietari nell’Italia moderna: Rapporti di produzione e contratti agrari dal secolo XVI ad oggi. Einaudi, Turin.
Grilli, S. 2005. Reti d’alleanza. Lo spazio matrimoniale di una fattoria senese, in M. Breschi and A. Fornasin (eds.), Il matrimonio in situazione estreme: Isole e isolati demografici, Forum, Udine, pp. 63–92.
Hajnal, J. 1965. European marriage patterns in historical perspective, in D. Glass and D.E.C. Eversley (eds.), Population in history, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 101–43.
Herlihy, D. and C. Klapisch-Zuber. 1985. The Tuscans and Their Families: A Study of the Florentine Catasto of 1427. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Kertzer, D.I. 1991. Household history and sociological theory. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 155–79.
Kertzer, D.I. 2002. Living with kin, in D.I. Kertzer and M. Barbagli (eds.), Family life in the long nineteenth century, Yale University Press, New Haven/London, pp. 40–72.
Kertzer, D.I. and C. Brettell. 1987. Advances in Italian and Iberian family history. Journal of Family History 12(1/3): 87–121.
Kertzer, D.I. and D.P. Hogan. 1991. Reflections on the European marriage pattern: Sharecropping and proletarianization in Casalecchio, Italy, 1861–1921. Journal of Family History 16(1): 31–45.
Kertzer, D.I. and R.P. Saller. 1991. The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present. Yale University Press, New Haven/London.
Kertzer, D.I., D.P. Hogan, and N. Karweit. 1992. Kinship beyond the household in a nineteenth-century Italian town. Continuity and Change 7(1): 103–21.
Lasker, G.W., C.G.N. Mascie-Taylor, and D.A. Coleman. 1986. Repeating pairs of surnames in marriages in Reading (England) and their significance for population structure. Human Biology 58: 421–5.
Laslett, P. 1977. Family Life and Illicit Love in Earlier Generations. Essays in Historical Sociology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Laslett, P. 1983. Family and household as work group and kin group: Areas of traditional Europe compared, in R. Wall et al. (eds.), Family forms in historic Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 513–63.
Le Play, F. 1871. L’organisation de la famille selon le vrai modèle signalé par l’histoire de toutes les races et de tous les temps. Alfred Mame et fils, Tours.
Levi, G. 1990. Family and kin—A few thoughts. Journal of Family History 15(4): 567–78.
Madrigal, L. and B. Ware. 1999. Mating pattern and population structure in Escazù, Costa Rica: A study using marriage records. Human Biology 71: 963–75.
Manfredini, M. 1996. L’utilizzo degli Status Animarum nelle ricostruzioni nominative: Miglioramenti informativi qualitativi e quantitativi. Il caso di Madregolo (1629–1914). Bollettino di Demografia Storica 24/25: 113–29.
Manfredini, M. 2003a. La mobilità di un paese rurale durante l’epidemia di colera del 1854–55, in M. Breschi, R. Derosas, and P.P. Viazzo (eds.), Piccolo è bello. Approcci microanalitici nella ricerca storico-demografica, Forum, Udine, pp. 93–104.
Manfredini, M. 2003b. The use of parish marriage registers in biodemographic studies: Two case-studies from nineteenth century Italy. Human Biology 75(2): 255–64.
Manfredini, M. 2003c. Families in motion: The role and characteristics of household migration in a 19th-century rural Italian parish. The History of the Family: An International Quarterly 8(2): 317–43.
Manfredini, M. 2005. Coresident and non-coresident kin in a nineteenth-century Italian rural community. Annales de Démographie Historique 1: 157–72.
Mascie-Taylor, C.G.N., G.W. Lasker, and A.J. Boyce. 1987. Repetition of the same surnames in different marriages as an indication of the structure of the population of Sanday Island, Orkney Islands. Human Biology 59: 97–102.
Moring, B. 1996. Marriage and social change in south-western Finland, 1700–1870. Continuity and Change 11(1): 91–113.
Perrenoud, A. 1998. The coexistence of generations and the availability of kin in a rural community at the beginning of the nineteenth century. The History of the Family 3(1): 1–15.
Pettener, D. 1985. Consanguineous marriages in the upper Bologna Apennine (1565–1980)—microgeographic variations, pedigree structure and correlation of inbreeding secular trend with changes in population size. Human Biology 57: 267–88.
Poni, C. 1982. Fossi e cavedagne benedicon le campagne. Il Mulino, Bologna.
Reher, D.S. 1998. Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24(2): 203–34.
Relethford, R. 1992. Analysis of marital structure in Massachusetts using repeating pairs of surnames. Human Biology 64: 25–33.
Rettaroli, R. 1990. Età al matrimonio e celibato nell’Italia del XIX secolo: Un’analisi regionale, in Società Italiana di Demografia Storica, Popolazione, società e ambiente. Temi di demografia storica italiana (secc. XVII–XIX), Clueb, Bologna, pp. 213–26.
Rettaroli, R. 1993. Maritu a chi troa, moglie a chi tocca. Nuzialità e famiglia nell’Italia mezzadrile del primo Ottocento, in Società Italiana di Demografia Storica, La popolazione delle campagne italiane in età moderna, Clueb, Bologna, pp. 505–26.
Rowland, R. 1983. Sistemes matrimoniales en la peninsula ibérica: Una perspectiva regional, in V. Perez and D.S. Reher (eds.), La demografia historica de la peninsula ibérica, Tecnos, Madrid, pp. 39–55.
Segalen, M. 1991. Mean age at marriage and kinship networks in a town under the influence of the metropolis: Nanterre, 1800–1850. Journal of Family History 16(1): 65–78.
Solinas, P.G. 1997. L’exogamie parfaite, l’espace généalogique dans une société complexe, in T. Barthélemy and M.C. Pingaud (eds.), La généalogie entre science et passion, Editions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques, Paris, pp. 65–86.
Tittarelli, L. 1991. Choosing a spouse among nineteenth-century Central Italian sharecroppers, in D.I. Kertzer and R.P Saller (eds.), The family in Italy from antiquity to present, Yale University Press, New Haven/London, pp. 271–85.
Trussell, J. and T. Guinnane. 1993. Techniques of event-history analysis, in D. Reher and R. Schofield (eds.), Old and new methods in historical demography, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 181–205.
van Leeuwen, M.H.D. and I. Maas. 2002. Partner choice and homogamy in the nineteenth century: Was there a sexual revolution in Europe? Journal of Social History 36: 101–23.
Viazzo, P.P. 2003. What’s so special about the Mediterranean? Thirty years of research on household and family in Italy. Continuity and Change 1(18): 111–37.
Viazzo, P.P. and D. Albera. 1990. The peasant family in Northern Italy, 1750–1930: A reassessment. Journal of Family History 15: 461–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Manfredini, M., Breschi, M. (2008). Marriage and the Kin Network: Evidence from a 19th-Century Italian Community. In: Bengtsson, T., Mineau, G.P. (eds) Kinship and Demographic Behavior in the Past. International Studies in Population, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6733-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6733-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6732-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6733-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)