The rapid increase in our technological mastering of more and more intimate and everyday aspects of life has created an acute sensitivity towards the huge lacunas left over by rational knowledge and technology. The present “turn towards the spiritual” has probably very much to do with such feelings of disturbance. From a Batesonean view the roots of these lacunae are to be found in fundamental epistemological errors in the preferred schemes of conceptualizations in western culture – a never decently surmounted dualism one might perhaps say. One central point here is the persistent reification of relation. Relations come in many kinds, but science invariably treats relations as dependent variables, dependent that is on things. Giving primacy to process and relation over things Bateson implicitly cleared the way for a semiotic kind of final causation, which however he would perhaps not himself have accepted, because his understanding of final causation implied an inversed – and totally contra factual – temporal ordering. The very systemic characteristics he found in aesthetics in natural systems seems however to point the way to other possibilities for understanding final causation. Possibilities which can be made fruitful in a biosemiotic reframing of technological challenges as well as in our feelings of belonging in a big “pattern that connects”.
Chapter PDF
References
Bateson, Gregory (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, Ballantine Books.
Bateson, Gregory (1979). Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity. New York, Bentam Books.
Bateson, Gregory and Mary Catherine Bateson (1987). Angels Fear. Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred. New York, Macmillan.
Deacon, Terrence (forthcoming). “Minimal Conditions for Natural Selection: How Selection Dynamics can Emerge from the Linkage of Autocatalysis and Molecular Self-Assembly.” In preparation.
Deely, John (1990). Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
Deely, John (1994). “How does Semiosis Effect Renvoi?” The American Journal of Semiotics 11(1/2): 11–61.
Deely, John (2001). Four Ages of Understanding. The First Postmodern Survey of Philosophy from Ancient Times to the Turn of the Twenty-first Century. Toronto, Toronto University Press.
Harries-Jones, Peter (1995). Ecological Understanding and Gregory Bateson. Toronto, Toronto University Press.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1996). Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1997). The Global Semiosphere. Semiotics Around the World. Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, Berkeley 1994, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1998). “Surfaces inside Surfaces. On the Origin of Agency and Life.” Cybernetics & Human Knowing 5(1): 33–42.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1999). “Order out of Indeterminacy.” Semiotica 127 (Biosemiotica II, Special issue on Biosemiotics edited by Jesper Hoffmeyer and Claus Emmeche): 321–343.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2001). “Life and Reference.” BioSystems. Special Issue (Guest edited by Luis Mateus Rocha): The Physics and Evolution of Symbols and Codes:Reflections on the Work of Howard Pattee. BioSystems 60(1/3): 123–130.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2006). Uexküllian Planmässigkeit. Sign Systems Studies 32: 73–97.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper and Claus Emmeche (1991). “Code-Duality and the Semiotics of Nature”. In Code-Duality and the Semiotics of Nature. M. Anderson and F. Merrell. New York, Mouton de Gruyter: 117–166.
Johnstone, Rufus A. (1997). “The Evolution of Animal Signals”. In The Evolution of Animal Signals. J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies. Oxford, Blackwell: 155–178.
Jung, Carl Gustav (1967 (1916)). Septem Sermones ad Mortuos. London, JM Watkins.
Kauffman, Stuart A. (1993). Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York/Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Kauffman, Stuart A. (2000). Investigations. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press.
Lettvin, J., H. Maturana, et al. (1959). “What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of US 47: 1940–51.
Nagel, Thomas (1986). The View from Nowhere. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press.
Pattee, Howard H. (1977). “Dynamic and Linguistic Modes of Complex Systems.” International Journal for General Systems 3: 259–266.
Russel, Bertrand and Alfred N. Whitehead (1910–13). Principia Mathematica, vol. I–III. Cambridge.
Salthe, Stanley (1993). Development and Evolution. Complexity and Change in Biology. Cambridge, Mass./London, MIT Press.
Sebeok, Thomas A. (1979). The Sign & Its Masters, University of Texas Press.
Short, T. L. (2002). “Darwin’s Concept of Final Cause: Neither New Nor Trivial.” Biology and Philosophy 17: 323–340.
Sjölander, Sverre (1995). “Some Cognitive Breakthroughs in the Evolution of Cognition and Consciousness and their Impact on the Biology of Language.” Evolution and Cognition 1(1): 3–11.
Sober, Elliot (1984). The Nature of Selection. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Ulanowicz, Robert E. (2002). “Ecology, a Dialog between the Quick and the Dead.” Emergence 4(1/2): 34–52.
Von Neumann, John (1966). Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata. Urbana, IL., University of Illinois Press.
Weber, Bruce (1998). “Emergence of Life and Biological Selection from the Perspective of Complex Systems Dynamics.” In Emergence of Life and Biological Selection from the Perspective of Complex Systems Dynamics. G. v. d. Vijver, S. Salthe and M. Delpos. Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). From Thing to Relation. On Bateson's Bioanthropology. In: Hoffmeyer, J. (eds) A Legacy for Living Systems. Biosemiotics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6706-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6706-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6705-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6706-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)