Contextualising comparative education in the regional framework of Europe cogently leads to the basic structural principle that has determined the mainstream of European history since the early Middle Ages: the dichotomy between diversity and unity. This basic argument explains that this introductory chapter takes up this theme and uses it as the continuous motif of the present analysis on the whole. It seems that the facts and trends that indicate diversity can be asserted as the stronger pole at first sight. This assumption has exercised its significant impact on comparative education throughout the development of this discipline. Consequently, our main attention is directed to the geographical, institutional and thematic map of Europe with its distinctive working places, whenever we are invited to investigate events, trends or attainments in any comparative approach: universities, research institutes, documentation centres, academic societies, regional units and, finally, states.
It is this latter kind of territorial limitation that has become the most significant determinant of comparative education from its origin to the threshold of the twenty-first century. May it suffice to trace the history of the discipline back to the beginning of the nineteenth century, when Marc-Antoine Jullien de Paris designed his project dealing with a plan of comparing state education systems all over Europe within the outer borders of the Holy Alliance that claimed to lay the ground for a peaceful order after the Napoleonic wars. (Jullien, 1992; Vandaele, 1993). However, Jullien's idea was overlapped and eventually replaced by the political and ideological alliance of state and nation, which should become the focus of comparative educational studies, namely in the configuration of the nation state, as an essential heritage of the French Revolution. It has gradually expanded from its emergence throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The current trends, however, signalise the end of the modern nation state's monopolising educational sovereignty in favour of competitors in the regional and global dimensions (Mitter, 2004; Bray et al., 2007).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anweiler, O. (1967). Konzeptionen der Vergleichenden Pädagogik. Georg Gei¿ler zum 65. Geburtstag. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 13, 205–318.
Anweiler, O. (1990). Vergleich von Bildung und Erziehung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und in der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik. Köln: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik.
Bray, M., Adamson, B. & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2007). Comparative educational research. approaches and methods. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Centre, The University of Hong Kong (Springer).
Brock, C. & Tulasiewicz, W. (2000, 2nd ed.). Education in a single Europe. London & New York: Routledge.
Cowen, R. (1980). Comparative education in Europe. A note. Comparative Education Review, 24, 98–108.
Cowen, R. (1998). Thinking comparatively about space, education and time: An approach to the Mediterranean rim. In A. M. Kazamias & M. G. Spillane (Eds.), Education and the structuring of uropean space: North-South, centre-periphery, identity-otherness. Athens: Seirios Editions.
Glowka, D. & Braun, F. (1975). Schulreform und Gesellschaft: Vergleichende Studien über die gesellschaftlichen Bedingungen von Schulreformen in sieben europäischen Ländern. Berlin: Max Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung.
Hans, N. A. (1949). Comparative education. A study of educational factors and traditions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Higginson, J. H. (1979). Selections from Michael Sadler: Studies in world citizenship. Liverpool: Dejall & Meyorre.
Hilker, F. (1962). Vergleichende Pädagogik. Eine Einführung in ihre Geschichte, Theorie und Praxis. München: Max Hueber.
Holmes, B. (1965). Problems in education. A comparative approach. New York: Humanities Press.
Holmes, B. (1981). Comparative education. Some considerations of method. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Husén, T. & Kogan, M. (Eds.) (1984). Educational research and policy. How do they relate? Oxford: Pergamon.
Jullien de Paris, M.-A. (1817). Esquisses d'un ourage sur l'éducation comparée. Paris: de Frais. Reprinted by Bureau International d'Education, Genève (new reprint 1992).
Kazamias, A. M & Spillane, M. G. (Eds.). (1996). Education and the structuring of European space: north-south, centre-periphery, identity-otherness. Athens: Seirios Editions.
King, E., Moor, H. & Mundy, J. A. (1994). Post-compulsory education. A new analysis in western Europe. London/Beverly Hills: Sage.
Lauwerys, J. A. (1958). Methoden der Vergleichenden Erziehungswissenschaft. Bildung und Erziehung, 11, 65–77.
Lê Thà n Khôi (1981). L'éducation comparée. Paris: Colin.
Mitter, W. (2005). Akteure und Netzwerke in der Vergleichenden Erziehungswissenschaft. Pädagogische Rundschau, 59, 207–220.
Mitter, W. (2004). Rise and decline of education systems. A contribution to the history of the modern state. Compare, 34, 351–369.
Paulston, R. G. (1999). Mapping comparative education after postmodernity. Comparative Education eview, 43, 438–463.
Robinsohn, S. B. et al. (1970/75, vols. 1 and 2). Schulreform im gesellschaftlichen Prozess. Stuttgart: Klett.
Schneider, F. (1961). Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft. Geschichte, Forschung, Lehre. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
Schriewer, J. (1987). Vergleich als Methode und Externalisierung von Welt: Vom Umgang mit Alterität und Reflexionsdisziplinen. In D. Baecker, et al. Theorie als Passion: Niklas Luhmann zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 629–668), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schriewer, J. (1999). Vergleich und Erklärung zwischen Kausalität und Komplexität. In H. Kaelble, & Schriewer, J. (Eds.), Diskurse und Entwicklungspfade. Gesesellschaftsvergleiche in Geschichts- und Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Vandaele, H. (1993). L'éducation comparée. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Watson, K. (1998). Memories, models and mapping: The impact of geopolitical changes on comparative studies in education. Compare, 28, 5–31.
Wilson, D. (1994). Comparative and International Education. Fraternal or Siamese Twins?. A preliminary genealogy of our twin fields. Comparative Education Review, 38, 449–486.
Winther-Jensen, T. (Ed.) (1996). Challenges to European education: Cultural values, national identities and global responsibilities. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitter, W. (2009). Comparative Education in Europe. In: Cowen, R., Kazamias, A.M. (eds) International Handbook of Comparative Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6403-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6403-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6402-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6403-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)