Skip to main content

The Optimistic Meta-Induction and Ontological Continuity: the Case of the Electron

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 255))

Abstract

The pessimistic meta-induction attempts to make a case for the lack of ontological continuity with theory change; in contrast, its rival the optimistic meta-induction makes a case for considerable ontological continuity. The optimistic meta-induction is argued for in the case of the origin, and continuity, of our talk of electrons (even though the term “electron” was not initially used). The case is made by setting the history of identifying reference to electrons in the context of a generalised version of Russell’s theory of descriptions, Ramsey’s theory of theoretical terms and a development of these ideas by David Lewis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achinstein, P. (1991) Particles and Waves: Historical Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabatzis, T. (2001) The Zeeman Effect and the Discovery of Electrons. In Buchwald and Warwick (eds.), pp. 171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabatzis, T. (2006) Representing Electrons. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. and Norton, J. (2001) What Should Philosophers of Science Learn from the History of the Electron? In Buchwald and Warwick (eds.), pp. 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, M. and Stich, S. (1998) The Fight to Reference, or How Not to Make Progress in the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science, 65, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald, J. and Warwick, A. (eds.) (2001) Histories of the Electron. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravartty, A. (1998) Semirealism, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 29, 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Per F. (1997) Flash of the Cathode Rays: A History of J. J. Thompson‘s Electron. Bristol/Philadelphia, PA: Institute of Physics Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demopoulos, W. (2003) On the Rational Reconstruction of our Knowledge. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 371–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demopoulos, W. and Friedman, M. (1985) Critical Notice: Bertrand Russell‘s “The Analysis of Matter”: Its Historical Context and Contemporary Interest. Philosophy of Science, 52, 621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M. (1997) Realism and Truth, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M. (2005) Scientific Realism. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy,chapter 26, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, I. (1987) Corpuscles, Electrons and Cathode Rays: J. J. Thomson and the Discovery of the Electron. British Journal for the History of Science, 20, 241–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, I. (2001) Corpuscles to Electrons. In Buchwald and Warwick (eds.), pp. 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H. (1973) Theory Change and Indeterminacy of Reference. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 462–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, G. (May 1897) Dissociation of Atoms. The Electrician, 39, 103–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, E., Brush, S., and Everitt, C. (eds.) (1986) Maxwell on Molecules and Gases. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooday, G. (2001) The Questionable Matter of Electricity: The Reception of J. J. Thomson‘s “Corpuscle” Among Theorists and Technologists. In Buchwald and Warwick (eds.), pp. 101–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, P. (1982) Energy, Force and Matter: The Conceptual Development of Nineteenth Century Physics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, H. (2001) The Electron, The Protyle, and the Unity of Matter. In Buchwald and Warwick (eds.), pp. 195–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1980) Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larmor, J. (1900) Aether and Matter: A Development of the Dynamical relations of the Aether to Material Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1981) A Confutation of Convergent Realism. Philosophy of Science, 48, 19–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1983) How to Define Theoretical Terms. In Philosophical Papers Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1999) Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. (2001) Why the Pessimistic Induction is a Fallacy. Syntheses, 129, 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magie, W. (1935) A Source Book in Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. (1970) Structural Realism and the Meaning of Theoretical Terms. In M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.) Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Volume IV. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. A. (1965) The Electron and the Light-Quant from the Experimental Point of View. Nobel Lectures: Physics: 1922–41. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 54–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (1928) Mr. Russell‘s “Causal Theory of Perception”. Mind, 37, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D. (1996) Theory-Dependent Terms. Philosophy of Science, 63, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plücker, J. (1858) On the Action of the Magnet upon the Electric Discharge in Gases. Philosophical Magazine, 16, 119–135 and 408–418; translation by F. Guthrie of a paper of 1858 in German.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1978) Meaning and the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1927) The Analysis of Matter. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1956) Logic and Knowledge. In R. C. Marsh (ed.) London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1959) The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiers, G. (1974) Ferdinand Braun and the Cathode Ray Tube. Scientific American, 230(3), 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, R. (1963) William Thomson: Smoke Rings and Nineteenth Century Atomism, Isis, 54, 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2001) J. J. Thomson and the Electron, 1897–1899. In Buchwald and Warwick (eds.), pp. 21–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, J. (1964) Structural and Spectral Changes of Chemical Atoms. Nobel Lectures: Physics: 1901–21, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 427–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. J. (1883) A Treatise on the Motion of Vortex Rings. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. J. (May 1897) Cathode Rays, Discourse Delivered at the Royal Institution, April 30. The Electrician, 39, 104–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. J. (October 1897) Cathode Rays. Philosophical Magazine, 44, 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. J. (1911) Electricity and Matter. London: Constable and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. J. (1967) Carriers of Negative Electricity. Nobel Lectures: Physics: 1922–41, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. and Thomson, G. (1933) Conduction of Electricity Through Gases, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3rd edition (of 1903 first edition in one volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S. (1990) The Discovery of Subatomic Particles. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, E. (1951) A History of Theories of Aether and Electricity Volume 1. London: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nola, R. (2008). The Optimistic Meta-Induction and Ontological Continuity: the Case of the Electron. In: Soler, L., Sankey, H., Hoyningen-Huene, P. (eds) Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 255. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics