Within the space of less than a decade, nanotechnology has emerged as a major technological theme not only across most of the science and engineering disciplines, but also across most of the world, including in many developing countries in Asia, South America, and Africa. Because they have identified great economic potential, or simply because they have not wanted to lag behind, governments around the globe have launched nanotechnology programs and initiatives and promoted nanobusiness alliances to harvest the fruits of the “next industrial revolution”. This perhaps unprecedented global technological movement has been fostered by exaggerated promises that nanotechnology will fundamentally change society, that it will bring the wealth, health, clean environment and security of which we have all dreamt. At the same time, however, warning voices have argued that such a powerful technology could also bring about unparalleled harm to the world, from environmental hazards to the destruction of all life. And so the ethicists and philosophers have been called in.
My involvement in discussions of the ethical and societal implications of nano-technology has been developing since 2002, through attending and organizing conferences that have grown rapidly from small-scale meetings to large international events, and through sitting on boards and expert groups to advise others on these matters. There is little doubt that ethical reflection has been unable to keep up with the pace of globalization of the nanotechnology movement. Unlike research in nanotechnology, perception of ethical issues surrounding nanotechnology is influenced by the specificities of cultural background, to the extent that, for instance, some countries heavily involved in research do not see any such issues at all. All this causes misunderstandings and contributes to the reinforcement of cultural clichés, which need to be overcome by in-depth discussion. As nanotechnology turns global
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act. Washington, DC, December 2003, Sec. 2, b.10.
Drexler, K.E. 1986. Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
Fujita, Y. 2005. Heterogeneous scientists meet in the national lab: The Atom Technology Project in 1990s Japan. Unpublished paper presented at the conference Nano before There Was Nano: Historical Perspectives on the Constituent Communities of Nanotechnology, Chemical Heritage Foundation, Philadelphia, PA, March 2005.
Gordijn, B. 2005. Nanoethics: From apocalyptic nightmares and utopian dreams towards a more balanced view. Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 521–533
Joss, S. and J. Durant, eds. 1995. Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum.
Kostoff, R.N et al. 2006. The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8: 301–321.
Lewenstein, B.V. 2004. What counts as a “social and ethical issue” in nanotechnology? Hyle: International Journal of Philosophy of Chemistry 10: 5–18.
Moor, J.H. and J. Weckert. 2004. Nanoethics: Assessing the nanoscale from an ethical point of view. In Discovering the Nanoscale, eds. D. Baird, A. Nordmann and J. Schummer, 301–310. Amsterdam, NH: IOS Press.
National Science Technology Council. 1999. Nanotechnology: Shaping the World Atom by Atom, Washington, DC.
Newman, W.R. 2004. Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Nordmann, A. 2004. Nanotechnology's worldview: New space for old cosmologies. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 23: 48–54.
Preston, C.J. 2004. The promise and threat of nanotechnology: Can environmental ethics guide us? Hyle: International Journal of Philosophy of Chemistry 10: 19–44.
Rip, A et al., eds. 1995. Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London: Pinter.
Roco, M.C. and W.S. Bainbridge, eds. 2002. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Arlington, VA : National Science Foundation.
Salamanca-Buentello, F et al. 2005. Nanotechnology and the developing world. PLoS Medicine 2.5: 100–103.
Schummer, J. 2003. The notion of nature in chemistry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34: 705–736.
Schummer, J. 2004a. Interdisciplinary issues of nanoscale research. In Discovering the Nanoscale, eds. D. Baird, A. Nordmann and J. Schummer, 9–20. Amsterdam, NH: IOS Press.
Schummer, J. 2004b. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 59: 425–465.
Schummer, J. 2004c. Societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology: Meanings, interest groups, and social dynamics. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8.2: 56–87.
Schummer, J. 2005. Reading nano: The public interest in nanotechnology as reflected in book purchase patterns. Public Understanding of Science 14: 163–183.
Schummer, J. 2006a. Historical roots of the ‘mad scientist’: Chemists in 19th-century literature. Ambix 53: 99–127.
Schummer, J. 2006b. Nano-Erlösung oder Nano-Armageddon?—Technikethik im christlichen Fundamentalismus. In Nanotechnologien im Kontext: Philosophische, ethische und gesells-chaftliche Perspektiven, eds. A. Nordmann, J. Schummer and A. Schwarz, 263–276. Berlin, Germany: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
Schummer, J. 2007a. Identifying ethical issues of nanotechnologies. In Nanotechnology: Science, Ethics and Policy Issues, ed. H. ten Have. Paris: UNESCO.
Schummer, J. 2007b. The Global Institutionalization of Nanotechnology Research: A bibliometric Approach to the Assessment of Science Policy. Scientometrics 70.3: 291–307.
Schummer, J. 2008. The Impact of Nanotechnologies on Developing Countries. In Nanoethics: Examining the Societal Impact of Nanotechnology, eds. F. Allhoff, P. Lin, J. Moor, and J. Weckert. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Press.
US National Nanotechnology Initiative to the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (Sec. 2).
White House, Office of the Press Secretary. 2000. National nanotechnology initiative: Leading to the next industrial revolution. Press release, 21 January 2000, Washington, DC.
Wilsdon, J. and R. Willis. 2004. See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schummer, J. (2009). Cultural Diversity in Nanotechnology Ethics. In: Allhoff, F., Lin, P. (eds) Nanotechnology & Society. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6209-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6209-4_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9385-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6209-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)