Skip to main content

Synergy for Sustainability

Law, Science, and Computability

  • Chapter
  • 1361 Accesses

Part of the book series: Alliance For Global Sustainability Bookseries ((AGSB,volume 11))

At the most general level of analysis, concerns pertaining to sustainability includes the viability of (1) ecological configuration, (2) economic activity, (3) political behavior and governance, and (4) institutional performance. This chapter addresses key issues pertaining to law and implications for sustainability (Choucri, 1999: 149), and, by definition, to each of these domains as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aikenhead, M. (2006). A discourse on law and artificial intelligence. Law Technology Jour-nal, 5(1). Retrieved August, 2005, from http://www.law.warwick.ac.uk/ltj/5-1c.html

  • Aman, A. 2004. The democracy deficit taming globalization through law reform. (New York: New York University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Atias, C. (1994). Legal experiments: are there any crucial experiments? Théorie du droit et de la science, L’Armatan, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. R. (1999). Law, chaos, and complexity: can progress in the law be accelerated? revised edition, The International Lawyer, Nomos Verlags Gesellschaft, Baden Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. R. and de Fontbressin, P. (1992-1993). The French référé procedure - a legal miracle? The University of Miami Yearbook of International Law: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedikt, M. 1994. Cyberspace: some proposals. (In Cyberspace: First Steps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordonove, G. (1984). Les rois qui ont fait la France, les capétiens, Saint Louis. Collection Marabout University, Editions Pygmalion/Gerald Watelet, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, S. S. (1995). For $100 you get software that costs $100 million to make. Wired Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonnier, J. (1992). Flexible droit, pour une sociologie du droit sans rigueur. seventh edi-tion (L.G.D.J. Paris)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J. (1998). The force of an idea. The New Yorker: January 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choucri, N. 1999. The political logic of sustainability. In E. Becker and T. Jahn (Eds.) Sus-tainability and the social sciences, a cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environ-mental considerations into theoretical reorientation. London: Zed Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C. (1992). Why so many lawyers? Are they good or bad? Fordham Law Review: 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1992). The institutional structure of production, Occasional papers from the law school. University of Chicago, No. 28, Nobel Prize Lecture. (Buffalo, New York: Hein and Company)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. 1985. Revolution in science. (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J. P. 1968. The Oracles of the law. (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Law School)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebolt, S. (2000). Ubiquity of networks. Revue internationale de théorie du droit et de socio-logie (L.G.D.J.), No. J4J6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, A. (1994). The scientific paradigm in modern legal thought. Théorie du Droit et Science, Léviathan, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, F. 1995. Introduction: the scientist as a rebel, nature’s imagination. In J. Cornwell II (Ed.) A debate on the future of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • The. Economist, (2005). Technology Quarterly. The Economist, December 10: 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. A. (2004). Optimal complexity of legal rules. Chicago Working Paper Series Index. Retrieved 2004, from http://www.law.uchicago.edu/lawecon/index.htm

  • Fisher, R. and Ury, W. 1981. Getting to the yes. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, L. L. 1964. Morality and the law. revised edition. (New Haven: Yale University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M. and Palay, T. 1991. Tournament of lawyers. The transformation of the big law firm. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. and Wu, T. 2006. Who controls the Internet? Illusions of a borderless world. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. 1988. A Brief History of Time. (New York: Bantam Books)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, O. W. 1920. Collected legal papers. (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahan, G. (2006). Le rapport du congrès sur le Can-Spam Act: bilan de la loi américaine con-tre les spam (The report of congress on the Can-Spam Act: the effect of the American law against spamming). Gazette du Palais, Paris: 16-20 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R. A. (1994). Do lawyers cause adversarial legalism? A preliminary inquiry. Law, and social inquiry, Journal of the American Bar Foundation: 19(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, S. P. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: heurists and biases. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions, second edition. (Chicago: Univer-sity of Chicago Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laingui, A. and Le Bigre, A. (1979). Histoire du droit penal II, la procédure criminelle. Syn-thèse Cujas 4, 6, 8 rue de la Maison Blanche, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamtest, C. (2006). The marketplace of perception. Harvard Magazine, March-April: 49-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. 1999. Code and other laws of cyberspace. (New York: Basic Books)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. (1995). What ails America? Talk given at Edgartown, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1966). Artificial intelligence in information. A Scientific American Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaigne, M. 1958. The complete essays of Montaigne, 13th Essay, Of experience. Trans-lated by Donald M. Frame. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. 2002. Ruling the root. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir Watt, H. (2003). Yahoo! cyber-collision of cultures: who regulates? Michigan Journal of International Law, 24(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. J. (1993). Professional innovation, corporate lawyers and private law making. Law and Social Inquiry American Bar Association, 18(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenberg, J. R. (2002). Yahoo! and democracy on the Internet. Jurimetrics, 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinstein, M. 1969. Introduction to Max Weber. On law and economy in society. The 20th Century Legal Philosophy Series. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissland, E. L. (1990). Artificial intelligence and the law: stepping stones to a model of legal reasoning. The Yale Law Journal, 99(8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara, E. (1995). The end of progressivism. Foreign Affairs, September/October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A. M. 2004. A new world order. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. 1994. The sciences of the artificial. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A. 1988. The collapse of complex societies. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, S. (2001). The lure of complexity. Context #6, The Nature Institute. Retrieved Sep-tember 27, 2006, from http://natureinstitute.org/pub/ic/ic6/complexity.htm

  • Tribe, L. (1989). Laws, geometry and the curvature of constitutional space. The Record of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York: Cardoyo Lecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubek, D. M. (1984). Where the action is. Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism, Stanford Law Review

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. M. 1983. The critical legal studies movement. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer-sity Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. principals on Internet’s domain names and addressing system. Retrieved August 19, 2005, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainename/USDNSprincipals_06302005.htm

  • Weise, R. H. (1992). Representing the corporate client/designs for quality. (In Full client utilization. New Jersey: Prentice Hall and Business)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitrow, G. J. Ed.). (1970. Einstein: the man and his achievement. (In Einstein: early years. Reprinted by R. Karplus in Physics and man. New York: W.A. Benjamin Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. 1998. Consilience - the unity of knowledge. (New York: Alfred Knopf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. (2005). E.U. and U.S. clash over control of the net. International Herald Tribune: September 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younger, I. (1980). Society, law and the Congress of the United States. Charles Even Hughes memorial lectures (unpublished paper).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baker, W.R. (2007). Synergy for Sustainability. In: Choucri, N., Mistree, D., Haghseta, F., Mezher, T., Baker, W.R., Ortiz, C.I. (eds) Mapping Sustainability. Alliance For Global Sustainability Bookseries, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6071-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6071-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6070-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6071-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics