Atweh, B., & Clarkson, P. (2001). Internationalization and globalization of mathematics education: Toward an agenda for research/action. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres, (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective, (pp. 77–94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ball, D. L. (1993). Halves, pieces, and troths: Constructing and using representational contexts in teaching fractions. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg, (Eds.), Rational numbers: An
integration of research, (pp. 328–375). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Baroody, A. J. (1990) How and when should place-value concepts and skills be taught?

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 281–286.

CrossRefBecker, J. P., Sawada, T., & Shimizu, Y. (1999). Some findings of the U.S.-Japan cross-cultural research on students’ problem-solving behaviors. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley, (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education, (pp. 121–139). London: Falmer Press.

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Burrill, G. (1997). The NCTM standards: Eight years later.

School Science and Mathematics, 97(6), 335–339.

CrossRefCai, J. (1995). A cognitive analysis of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical performance on tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education monograph series 7), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.

Cai, J. (2000a). Mathematical thinking involved in U.S. and Chinese students’ solving processconstrained and process-open problems.

Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 309–340.

CrossRefCai, J. (2000b). Understanding and representing the arithmetic averaging algorithm: An analysis and comparison of U.S. and Chinese students’ responses.

International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31, 839–855.

CrossRefCai, J. (2001). Improving mathematics learning: Lessons from cross-national studies of U.S. and Chinese students. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 400–405.

Cai, J. (2004). Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving? Exploring the impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 135–167.

Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). U.S. and Chinese students’generalized and generative thinking in mathematical problem solving and problem posing.

Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 401–421.

CrossRefCai, J., & Lester, F. K. (2005). Solution and pedagogical representations in Chinese and U.S. classrooms.

Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 221–237.

CrossRefDreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1996). On different facets of mathematical thinking. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev, (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking,(pp. 253–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N., & Belanger, M. (1987). Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation. In C. Janvier, (Ed.)_ Problems of representation in the teaching and
learning mathematical problem solving(pp. 109–122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Goldin, G. A. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving, In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education(pp. 197–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Goldin, G. A. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: A unifying research perspective. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter, (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards
for school mathematics(pp. 275–285). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Janvier, C. (1987). Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematical problem solving. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Larkin, J. H. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics.In D. Genter & A. L. Stevens (Ed.), Mental models(pp. 75–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Leinhardt, G. (1993). On teaching. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1–54)., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Mathematical Science Education Board. (1998). The nature and role of algebra in the K-14 curriculum: Proceedings of a national symposium. Washington DC : National Research Council.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Author..

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Author.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2004).Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Author.

Pimm, D. (1995). Symbols and meanings in school mathematics. London: Routledge.

Sekiguchi, Y. (1998). Mathematics education research as socially and culturally situated. In A. Serpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity(pp. 391–396). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Silver, E. A., Leung, S. S., & Cai, J. (1995). Generating multiple solutions for a problem: A comparison of the responses of U.S. and Japanese students.

Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28(1), 35–54.

CrossRefSmith, S. P. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: Children’s representations of problems. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Ed.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics(pp. 263–274). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.