Skip to main content

Living – in between – Cultures

Downscaling Intercultural Aesthetics to Daily Life

  • Chapter
Book cover Intercultural Aesthetics

Rotkoff undoubtedly read Sun Tzu's The Art of War, written over 2,000 years ago. War is an art. Japanese got acquainted with Sun Tzu's text in the fifth century, when envoys visited China to acquire new insights in skills and to purchase tools and techniques. After the introduction of Buddhism the warrior class, bushi, started to write haiku as a meditative stylization of the now here experience, the core element of Zen: emptiness (mu, Sanskrit: sunyata) and the suchness of things (son-omama, konomama; Sanskrit: tathata). During the pacification of Japan after 1600, Yamaga Soko forged martial skills into a Zen Buddhist based, self-disciplining practice: The way (do) of the samurai class.2 While walking the bushido in peace time the samurai handled both sword and pen — bu to bun — to write and paint. And when their time had come to kill themselves so as to appease conflicting loyalties or pay their debts to their clan, before cutting (kiri) their bellies (hara) open, performing seppuku, some even wrote down their final haiku. The long trajectory from Japanized Chinese knowledge via meditative verse to the briefings of an Iraqi-based American Colonel with a Jewish background is highly intercultural, because of the temporal and spatial transformations that are presupposed in this process of cross cultural adaptation and cultivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See B. Woodward,State of Denial. Bush at War, Part III. Simon & Schuster, New York, 2006, pp. 98, 102, 211

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sun Tzu,The Art of War (Transl. S. B. Griffith). Oxford University Press, London, 1963, p. 174

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Fukuyama,The End of History and the Last Man. Free Press, New York, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. See also G. Lelli, ‘Transculturality: A Problematic Concept. Aesthetics between the Islam and the West’, in G. Marchiano & R. Milani (eds.), Frontiers of Transculturality in Contemporary Aesthetics. Trauben, Turin, 2001, p. 465

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Oosterling,Radicale middelmatigheid. Boom, Amsterdam, 2000. http://www.henkooster-ling.nl/radmid/radicale.html

    Google Scholar 

  6. The word ‘Interesse’ is German for ‘interest’. It also means ‘to be interested in’. In a philosophical context this connotation is used in a literal sense: being (esse) in between (inter)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. C. Taylor,Tears. SUNY Press, Albany, 1990, p. 141

    Google Scholar 

  8. See L. Apostel,Atheïstische spiritualiteit. VUB Press, Brussel, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  9. See H. Kimmerle,Philosophien der Differenz. Eine Einführung. Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  10. For further elaboration see H. Oosterling, ‘From Interests to Inter-esse: Jean-Luc Nancy on Deglobalization and Sovereignty’,SubStance, 106, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2005, pp. 81–103

    Google Scholar 

  11. On this topic there is an indirect relation between French existentialists like Sartre and Camus and thinkers of difference. This existentialist tone resonates in texts of Japanese thinkers like Kuki and D.T. Suzuki. However an aesthetics of existence cannot be explained by applying the crypto-metaphysical opposition betweenessentia andexistentia. See T. Botz-Bornstein,Place and Dream. Japan and the Virtual. Rodopi, Amsterdam, 2004, pp. 31, 48, 68

    Google Scholar 

  12. In fact Heidegger reworked Japanese aesthetics implicitly without any reference. See for this philosophical imperialisms: R. May,Ex Oriente Lux. Heideggers Werk unter ostasiatischen Einfluss. Steiner, Stuttgart, 1989; see for a comparative discussion: Botz-Bornstein, op. cit., pp. 26–51

    Google Scholar 

  13. Between 1997 and 2002 this was a research program of the Center for Philosophy & Arts (CFK) based at the Department of Philosophy of the Erasmus University Rotterdam. See for national and international symposia and publications:www2.eur.nl/fw/cfk

  14. See A. C. Danto,The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. Columbia University Press, New York, 1986, p. 209;The State of the Art. Prentice Hall, New York, 1987, p. 208

    Google Scholar 

  15. See H. Oosterling, ‘Sens(a)ble Intermediality and Interesse. Towards on Ontology of the In-Between’,Intermédialités, No. 1, Spring 2003, pp. 29–46. CRI Montreal. http://cri.histart.umontreal.ca/cri/fr/INTERMEDIALITES/p1/pdfs/p1_oosterling.pdf

  16. This redirection can be situated in between two exhibitions in Centre Pompidou: Lyotard,Les Immateriaux (1985) and R. Krauss,L'Informe (1996). See for the latter: Y.-A. Bois & R. E. Kraus,Formless. A User's Guide. Zone books, New York, 1997. See further: H. Oosterling, ‘ICTheology or local interesse? Desacralizing Derrida's chora’, in L. Nagl (ed.),Essays zu Jacques Derrida and Gianni Vattimo, Religion. Peter Lang. Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, New York, 2001, pp. 109–130

    Google Scholar 

  17. See T.M. Raysor (ed.),Coleridge's Miscellaneous Criticism. Folcroft Press, London, 1936, p. 33

    Google Scholar 

  18. See D. Higgins,The Poetics and Theory of the Intermedia. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. J. Albersmeier,Theater, Film und Literatur in Frankreich. Medienwechsel und Intermedialität. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1992; P. Zima (ed.),Literatur intermedial. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1995; J. M ü ller, Intermedialit ä t. Formen moderner kultureller Kommunikation. Nodus Publikationen, M ü nster, 1996. Henk Oosterling & Ewa Plonovska-Ziarek (eds.), Intermedialities. Philosophy, Art, Politics. Rowland & Littlefield, Lanham, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  20. M ü ller, op. cit., p. 83 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  21. M ü ller, op. cit., p. 89 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Wagner (ed.),Icons — Texts — Iconotexts. Essays on Ekphrasis and Intermediality. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996, p. 17

    Google Scholar 

  23. U. Link-Heer & V. Roloff (eds.),Luis Bu ñ uel. Film — Literatur — Intermedialit ä t. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1994, p. 4 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. Roloff, ‘Einleitung: Bu ñ uels reflektierte Intermedialit ä t’, in Link-Heer & Roloff, op. cit., p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  25. V. Borsò, ‘Luis Bu ñ uel: Film, Intermedialit ä t und Moderne’, in Link-Heer & Roloff, op. cit., p. 160 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  26. See G. Deleuze,Francis Bacon. Logique du la sensation. Éditions de la différence, La Vue le Texte, Paris, 1981, p. 27; G. Deleuze, F. Guattari,Qu'est-ce que la philosophie ? Éditions de Minuit, Paris, 1991, p. 200

    Google Scholar 

  27. Botz-Bornstein, op. cit., p. 48

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Szeemann (Hrgs.),Der Hang zum Gesamtkunstwerk. Europ ä ische Utopien seit 1800. Verlag Sauerl ä nder, Aarau und Frankfurt a/M, 1983, p. 16

    Google Scholar 

  29. See the concluding remarks of W. Benjamin,The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, (1935). see:www.arthistoryarchive.com/arthistory/modern/The-Work-of-Art-in-the-Age-of-Mechanical-Reproduction.html

  30. M. Foucault,Histoire de la sexualité 2. L'usage des plaisirs. Édition Gallimard, Paris, 1984, pp. 16–17

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. Deleuze,Pure Immanence. Essays on a Life. Zone Books, New York, 2001, p. 29

    Google Scholar 

  32. See J.-F. Lyotard,Les TRANSformateurs DUchamp. Galilée, Paris, 1977, p. 13

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lyotard, op. cit., p. 35

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. Tomkins,Duchamp. A Biography. Henry Holt, New York, 1996, p. 429

    Google Scholar 

  35. See M. Hamashita, ‘Taste and Novelty from the Viewpoint of Modernity in Japan’, in G. Marchiano & R. Milani, op. cit., p. 501

    Google Scholar 

  36. ‘These like all other basic categories will be referred to in their non-translatable form, because these being multilayered don't allow a simple translation,’ R. Ohashi states inKire. Das ‘SchÖne’ in Japan. Philosophisch- ä sthetische Reflexionen zu Geschichte und Moderne. Dument, KÖln, 1994, p. 161 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. Wilkinson, ‘Aesthetic Virtues in the Context of Nirvanic Values’, in G. Marchiano & R. Milani, op. cit., p. 98

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wilkinson, op. cit., p. 92

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. T. Suzuki,Zen and Japanese Culture. Bollinger Series, Princeton, 1970, p. 24

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ohashi, op. cit., p. 74 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  41. Suzuki, op. cit., p. 258

    Google Scholar 

  42. Botz-Bornstein, op. cit., p. 48

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kiru means to cut with a sword and metaphorically ‘to end’.Kiri indicates a limit or end,kire a slice. In combinations likeomoi kiru this cutting of thinking (omoi) means ‘to decide’ or as inhara kiri cutting the belly (hara)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ohashi, op. cit., p. 16 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ohashi, op. cit., p. 66 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ohashi, op. cit., p. 75 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ohashi, op. cit., p. 36 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Abe,Zen and Western Thought. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 1985, p. 233

    Google Scholar 

  49. See T. Deshimaru,Zen & Arts Martiaux. Editions Seghers, Paris, 1977, pp. 31, 145

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ohashi, op. cit., p. 80 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  51. To give one example, the different ‘schools’ (ryu) in karate are the result of adaptingkata to the specific physical and mental qualities of the master, who after first having learnt the style of hissensei and having protected his master's school, develops his ownryu. This threefold development is calledshu ha ri

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ohashi, op. cit., p. 104 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  53. M.-H. Kim, ‘Aesthetics Disinterestedness in East-Asian Way of Thinking’, in G. Marchiano & R. Milani, op. cit., p. 485

    Google Scholar 

  54. K. Nishitani,The Self-Overcoming of Nihilism. SUNY Press, New York, 1990, p. 180

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ohashi, op. cit., p. 156 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  56. See I. Arata, ‘Ma: Japanese Time-Space’, inThe Japanese Architect. International Edition of Shinkenchiku. no. 262, Feb. 1979, pp. 69–80

    Google Scholar 

  57. See Ch. Buci-Glucksmann,Der kartographische Blick der Kunst. Merve, Berlin, 1997, p. 166 [my translation]. See for an extensive exploration of ma: H. Oosterling, ‘A Culture of the Inter. Japanese Notions of Ma and Basho’, in Sensus communis in Multi- and Intercultural perspective. On the Possibility of Common Judgements in Arts and Politics. H. Kimmerle & H. Oosterling (eds.), KÖnigshausen & Neumann, W ü rzburg, Part 7; Botz-Bornstein, op. cit., pp. 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  58. See S. Ueda, ‘Nishida, Nationalism, and the Question of Nationalism’, in J. C. Maraldo & J. W. Heisig,Rude Awakenings. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 1995, p. 102

    Google Scholar 

  59. See K. Nishida,An Inquiry into the Good. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1990. See also: R. Elberfeld,Kitaro Nishida (1870–1945). Das Verstehen der Kulturen. Moderne japanische Philosophie und die Frage nach der Interkulturalit ä t. Amsterdam, 1999, pp. 107–109

    Google Scholar 

  60. In Japanese ‘experience’ is eitherkeiken or taiken, respectively ‘Erfahrung’ and ‘Erlebnis’. See Y. Yuasa,The Body. Towards an Eastern Mind-Body theory. SUNY Press, Albany, 1987, p. 49

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yuasa, op. cit., p. 39

    Google Scholar 

  62. Botz-Bornstein, op. cit., p. 29

    Google Scholar 

  63. Botz-Bornstein, op. cit., p. 35

    Google Scholar 

  64. Botz-Bornstein, op. cit., p. 48

    Google Scholar 

  65. Abe, op. cit., p. 233

    Google Scholar 

  66. Suzuki, op. cit., p. 13

    Google Scholar 

  67. T. Deshimaru,Zen and Arts Martiaux. Paris, 1977, p. 34 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  68. See the works of the American-based Tibetan Buddhist ChÖgyam Trungpa Rinpoche (1939–1987),Cutting through Spiritual Materialism (1973) andShambhala. The Sacred Path of the Warrior (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Deshimaru, op. cit., p. 31 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ohashi thematizes this even more profoundly, when he concludes that Japanese culture is the result of an ongoing process of importing and adapting other cultures like China, Korea, Europe and recently the USA: ‘For the Japanese European influences were no longer an alien world, they became their own world’ (141) [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  71. See for an extensive account: H. Oosterling, ‘Scheinheiligkeit oder die Heiligkeit des Scheins. Subjektkritische Besch ä ftigungen mit Japan’, inDas Multiversum der Kulturen. H. Kimmerle (Hrgs.), Rodopi Elementa, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 103–120

    Google Scholar 

  72. See E. Roudinesco,Jacques Lacan. Esquisse d’une vie, histoire d’un système de pensée. Fayard, Paris, 1993, p. 456. See H. Oosterling, ‘Radikale Mediokrit ä t oder revolution ä re Akte? Über fundamentals Inter-esse’, in E. Vogt, H.J. Silverman (Hrgs.), Über Zizek. Turia + Kant, Vienna, pp. 42–62

    Google Scholar 

  73. See J.-F. Lyotard, Que peindre? Adami, Arakawa, Buren. Editions de la différence, Paris, 1987, p. 108 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  74. J.-F. Lyotard,The Inhuman. Reflections on Time. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1991, p. 45

    Google Scholar 

  75. Idem, p. 140

    Google Scholar 

  76. J.-F. Lyotard,Moralités Postmodernes. Galilée, Paris, 1993, p. 204 [my translation]

    Google Scholar 

  77. M. Yoneyama, ‘Creative Chora and Aesthetic of Place’, in G. Marchiano & R. Milani, op. cit., pp. 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  78. K. K. Inada, ‘The Aesthetics of Oriential Emptiness’, in G. Marchiano & R. Milani, op. cit., p. 74

    Google Scholar 

  79. M. C. Taylor, ‘On Deconstruction Theology: A Symposium on Erring: A Postmodern A/ Theology’,Journal of the American Academy of Religion, LIV/3, 1986, p. 553

    Google Scholar 

  80. Botz-Bornstein, op. cit., p. 46

    Google Scholar 

  81. N. R. Glass,Working Emptiness. Towards a Third Reading of Emptiness In Buddhism and Postmodern Thought. Scholars Press, Atlanta, 1995, p. 94

    Google Scholar 

  82. Yoneyama, op. cit., p. 106

    Google Scholar 

  83. See E. Giaccardi, ‘Transcultural Vision and Epistemological Shift: From Aesthetics to High-Tech Society’, in G. Marchiano & R. Milani, op. cit., p. 507

    Google Scholar 

  84. ‘Trans’ indicates disappearance as a result of excess. See J. Baudrillard,La Transparance du Mal. Galilée, Paris, 1990, pp. 22–42

    Google Scholar 

  85. G. Deleuze,Pure Immanence. Essays on A Life. Zone Books, New York, 2001, p. 26

    Google Scholar 

  86. See for a critical comment, J. de Mul, ‘Transhumanism. The Convergence of Evolution, Humanism and Information Technology’, in Rhizome.org, Connecting Art & Technology. Seewww2.eur.nl/fw/hyper/index.htm

  87. Deleuze, op. cit., p. 29

    Google Scholar 

  88. Apostel, op. cit., p. 24

    Google Scholar 

  89. Apostel, op. cit., p. 123

    Google Scholar 

  90. In Belgian academic research two trajectories are relevant: W. Desmond,Being and the Between (1995) enEthics and the Between (2001); for a social-therapeutic approach, L. Beyers,Conflict en inter-esse. VUB Press, Brussel, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  91. Wilkinson, op. cit., p. 101. However, for Japanese this is not obvious. In his after word to Ohashi's book onkire the translator warns the reader for an ecological interpretation of the Japanese mix of nature and technique. Ohashi, op. cit., p. 164

    Google Scholar 

  92. ‘Mental ecology’ is an option. It is in the cooperative oeuvre of Deleuze and Guattari that we find enough material to expand the idea that ecology has different dimensions: physical, social and mental. See F. Guattari,Les trois ecologies (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oosterling, H. (2009). Living – in between – Cultures. In: Van den Braembussche, A., Kimmerle, H., Note, N. (eds) Intercultural Aesthetics. Einstein Meets Margritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Science, Nature, Art, Human Action and Society, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5780-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics