Skip to main content

Conceptual Foundations and Applications of Physical Input-Output Tables

  • Chapter
Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 23))

Increasing empirical evidence suggests that current levels of anthropogenic environmental pressures on the world-wide level do not comply with requirements of environmental sustainability (for example, WWF et al. 2004). Especially industrialized countries, responsible for the largest share of pressures on the global environment, are demanded to significantly reduce the material and energy resources used for production and consumption and to achieve de-linking (or de-coupling) of economic growth from environmental degradation. The concept of de-linking was adopted by a large number of national, European and international environmental policies (for example, European Commission 2003; OECD 2004). While de-linking in relative terms decreases the resource intensity of economic processes, absolute de-linking is required from a sustainability point of view, in order to keep economic and social systems within the limits of the ecosphere (Hinterberger et al. 1997).1

Monitoring the transition of societies towards de-linking targets requires comprehensive and consistent information on the relations between socio-economic activities and resulting environmental consequences. In the past 15 years, a large number of approaches were developed providing this information in biophysical terms.2 These methods proved to be appropriate tools to quantify “ societal metabolism ” (Fischer-Kowalski 1998) and to measure the use of “ environmental space ” (Opschoor 1995) by human activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bailey, R., Allen, J. K., & Bras, B. (2004). Applying ecological input-output flow analysis to material flows in industrial systems. Part I: Tracing flows. Part II: Flow metrics. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(1–2), 45–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, R., Barrett, J., & Wiedmann, T. (2004). Exploring the consumption and related environmental impacts of socioeconomic groups within the UK. Paper presented at the Workshop “ Driving forces for and barriers to sustainable consumption ”, Leeds, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, C. J., & Ruth, M. (1999). Indicators of dematerialization and the materials intensity of use. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(3), 15–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P. L., & Moore, S. (2002). Approaches for quantifying the metabolism of physical economies. Part I: Methodological overview. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(4), 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49, 431–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003). Towards a thematic strategy for the sustainable use of natural resources (No. COM (2003) 572 final). Brussels: DG Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2001). Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators. A methodological guide. Luxembourg, Europe: Statistical Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998). Society's metabolism. Printed in G. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), International handbook of environmental sociology. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giljum, S., & Hubacek, K. (2001). International trade, material flows and land use: Developing a physical trade balance for the European Union (Interim Report No. 01–059). Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giljum, S., Hubacek, K., & Sun, L. (2004). Beyond the simple material balance: A reply to Sangwong Suh's note on physical input-output analysis. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravgaåd, P. O. (1999). Physical input-output tables for Denmark. Products and materials 1990. Air emissions 1990–92. Kopenhagen: Statistics Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, B. (1973). The structure of ecosystems. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 41, 535–546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterberger, F., Luks, F., & Schmidt-Bleek, F. (1997). Material flows vs. ‘natural capital ’ What makes an economy sustainable?. Ecological Economics, 23(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, R. (2003). Structural change of the physical economy. Decomposition analysis of physical and hybrid-unit input-output tables. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek, K., & Giljum, S. (2003). Applying physical input-output analysis to estimate land appropriation (ecological footprints) of international trade activities [unpublished manuscript]. Ecological Economics, 44(1), 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek, K., Giljum, S., & Meier, A. (2004). The environmental impacts of material flows: Linking approaches of life cycle assessment (LCA) with physical input-output tables (PIOTs). Presentation at the 8th Biennial Scientific Conference for the International Society for Ecological Economics. ISEE 2004 Montr é al. July 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneese, A. V., Ayres, R. U., & d&Arge, R. C. (1970). Economics and the environment: A material balance approach. Baltimore, MD/London: John Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konijn, P., de Boer, S., & van Dalen, J. (1997). Input-output analysis of material flows with applications to iron, steel and zinc. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8(1), 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konjin, P. J. A., de Boer, S., & van Dalen, J. (1995). Material flows, energy use and the structure of the economy (National Accounts Occasional Paper No. Nr. NA-077). Voorburg, The Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratena, K., Chovanec, A., & Konechy, R. (1992). Eine ö kologische volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnung f ü r Ö sterreich. Die Umwelt Input Output Tabelle 1983. Wien: Institut f ü r sozial-, wirtschafts- und umweltpolitische Forschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratterl, A., & Kratena, K. (1990). Reale Input-Output Tabelle und ö kologischer Kreislauf. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • M ä enp ä ä, I. (2002). Physical input-output tables of Finland 1995 — solutions to some basic methodological problems. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Montreal. Moll, S., & Acosta, J. (2003). Physical input-output analyses: Some experiences from ongoing research. Paper presented at the ConAccount Workshop, Wuppertal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebbia, G. (2000). Contabilita monetaria e conatibilita ambientale. Estratto da “ Economia pubblica ”, 6–2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niren, T., & Yoshida, T. (2004). Regional analysis of industrial ecology: A case study of Shiga Prefecture, Japan. Paper presented at the 8th ISEE Conference, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T. (1960). Ecological potential and analogue circuits for the ecosystem. American Scientist, 48, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004). Recommendation on material flows and resource productivity (Adopted by the OECD Council on 21 April 2004). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opschoor, J. B. (1995). Ecospace and the fall and rise of throughput intensity. Ecological Economics, 15, 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reijnders, L. (1998). The factor X debate: Setting targets for eco-efficiency. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sch ü tz, H., Bringezu, S., & Moll, S. (2004). Globalisation and the shifting environmental burden.Material trade flows of the European Union. Wuppertal, Germany: Wuppertal Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J., Femia, A., Hinterberger, F., & Sch ü tz, H. (1998). Material flow-based indicators in environmental teporting (Environmental Issues Series No. 14). Luxembourg, Europe: European Environmental Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahmer, C., Kuhn, M., & Braun, N. (1996). Physical input-output tables. German experiences. Paper presented at the London Group Meeting on Environmental Accounting, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahmer, C., Kuhn, M., & Braun, N. (1997). Physische Input-Output-Tabellen 1990. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2001). A physical input-output table for Germany 1995. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2003). Integrated environmental and economic accounting 2003. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Voet, E., van Oers, L., & Nikolic, I. (2003). Dematerialisation: Not just a matter of weight (CML Report No. 160). Leiden, The Netherlands: Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, H. (2004). Accounting for raw material requirements: A comparison of input-output approaches. Paper presented at the ConAccount Workshop 2004, Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, H., & Duchin, F. (2005). Physical and monetary input-output analysis: What makes the difference?. Ecological Economics, 57(3), 534–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, H., Schandl, H., & Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1999). OMEN — an operating matrix for material interrelations between the Economy and Nature. How to make material balances consistent. Printed in R. Kleijn, M. Fischer-Kowalski & V. Palm (Eds.), Ecologizing societal metabolism: Designing scenarios for sustainable materials managment. CML, Leiden University: Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann, T., Barrett, J., Billing, M., & Birch, R. (2004). The REAP tool — creating physical accounts for the UK and evaluating policy scenarios. Paper presented at the Workshop “ Driving forces for and barriers to sustainable consumption ”, Leeds, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF, UNEP and Global Footprint Network (2004). Living planet report 2004. Gland, Switzerland: WWF.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giljum, S., Hubacek, K. (2009). Conceptual Foundations and Applications of Physical Input-Output Tables. In: Suh, S. (eds) Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5737-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics