Abstract
We propose a methodology for extending the applicability of multibody-based comprehensive analysis codes to the maneuvering regime, with specific application to the flight of rotorcraft vehicles.
Maneuvers are here mathematically described in a concise yet completely general form as optimal control problems, each maneuver being defined by a specific form of the cost function and by suitable constraints on the vehicle states and controls. In principle, by solving the maneuver optimal control problem, one could determine the trajectory and the control time histories that steer the vehicle model, while minimizing the cost and satisfying the constraints. Unfortunately, optimal control problems are prohibitively expensive to solve for detailed comprehensive models of rotorcraft vehicles denoted by a large number of structural degrees of freedom and possibly sophisticated aerodynamics.
In order to make the problem computationally tractable, our formulation makes use of two models of the same vehicle. A coarse level flight mechanics model is used for solving the trajectory optimal control problem. Being based on a reduced model of the vehicle with only a few degrees of freedom, the resulting non-linear multi-point boundary value problem is computationally feasible. Next, the fine scale comprehensive model is steered in closed loop, tracking the trajectory computed at the flight mechanics level using a receding horizon model predictive controller. This amounts to a standard time marching problem for the comprehensive model, which is therefore also computationally feasible. The flight mechanics model is iteratively updated for ensuring close matching of the trajectories flown by the two models, by resorting to a neural adaptive element. This two-level procedure enables the simulation using comprehensive models of arbitrary complexity of maneuvers of possibly long duration, with general constraints on the vehicle inputs and outputs.
The new procedures are demonstrated with the help of numerical applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bauchau OA, Bottasso CL, Nikishkov YG (2001) Modeling Rotorcraft Dynamics with Finite Element Multibody Procedures. Mathematics and Computer Modeling, 33:1113–1137
Bauchau OA, Bottasso CL, Trainelli L (2003) Robust Integration Schemes for Flexible Multibody Systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 192:395–420
Bauchau OA, Rodriguez J, Bottasso CL (2001) Modeling of Unilateral Contact Conditions with Application to Aerospace Systems Involving Backlash, Freeplay and Friction. Mechanics Research Communications, 28:571–599
Betts JT (2001) Practical Methods for Optimal Control Using Non-Linear Programming. Philadelphia: SIAM
Bhagwat MJ, Leishman JG (2001) Stability, Consistency and Convergence of Time Marching Free-Vortex Rotor Wake Algorithms. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 46:59–71
Bottasso CL (1997) A New Look at Finite Elements in Time: A Variational Interpretation of Runge-Kutta Methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 25:355–368
Bottasso CL, Bauchau OA (2001) Multibody Modeling of Engage and Disengage Operations of Helicopter Rotors. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 46:290–300
Bottasso CL, Bauchau OA (1999) On the Design of Energy Preserving and Decaying Schemes for Flexible, Nonlinear Multibody Systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 169:61–79
Bottasso CL, Chang C-S, Croce A, Leonello D, Riviello L (2004) Adaptive Planning and Tracking of Trajectories for the Simulation of Maneuvers with Multibody Models. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195:7052–7072
Bottasso CL, Croce A, Leonello D, Riviello L (2005) Optimization of Critical Trajectories for Rotorcraft Vehicles. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 50:165–177
Bottasso CL, Croce A, Leonello D, Riviello L (2005) Rotorcraft Trajectory Optimization with Realizability Considerations. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 18:146–155
Bottasso CL, Micheletti S, Sacco R (2002) The Discontinuous Petrov-Galerkin Method for Elliptic Problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191:3391–3409
Bottasso CL, Riviello L (2005) Trimming of Multibody Rotorcraft Models by a Neural Model-Predictive Auto-Pilot. In: Proc. of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics, Madrid, Spain
Brentner KS, Perez G, Bres GA, Jones HE (2002) Toward a Better Understanding of Maneuvering Rotorcraft Noise. In: Proc. of the 58th American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, Montreal, Canada
Bryson AE, Ho YC (1975) Applied Optimal Control. New York: Wiley
Carlson EB, Zhao YJ (2001) Optimal Short Takeoff of Tiltrotor Aircraft in One Engine Failure. Journal of Aircraft, 39:280–289
CHARM (Comprehensive Hierarchical Aeromechanics Rotorcraft Model). http://www.continuum-dynamics.com/products/charm/index.html. NJ: Continuum Dynamics, Inc.
Findeisen R, Imland L, Allgöwer F, Foss BA (2003) State and Output Feedback Nonlinear Model Predictive Control: An Overview. European Journal of Control, 9:190–207
Frazzoli E, Dahleh MA, Feron E (2000) A Hybrid Control Architecture for Aggressive Maneuvering of Autonomous Aerial Vehicles. In: System Theory: Modeling, Analysis and Control. Djaferis TE, Schick IC (Eds.). SECS 518. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Johnson W (1992–1997) CAMRAD II, Comprehensive Analytical Model of Rotorcraft Aerodynamics and Dynamics. Palo Alto (CA): Johnson Aeronautics
Johnson W (1994) Helicopter Theory. New York: Dover Publications
Peters DA, He CJ (1995) Finite State Induced Flow Models. Part II: Three-Dimensional Rotor Disk. Journal of Aircraft, 32:323–333
Prasad JVR, Zhao J, Peters DA (2002) Helicopter Rotor Wake Distorsion Models for Maneuvering Flight. In: Proc. of the 28th European Rotorcraft Forum, Bristol, UK
Ribera M, Celi R (2004) Simulation Modeling of Unsteady Maneuvers Using a Time Accurate Free Wake. In: Proc. of the 60th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Baltimore, MD
Rutkowski M, Ruzicka GC, Ormiston RA, Saberi H, Jung Y (1995) Comprehensive Aeromechanics Analysis of Complex Rotorcraft Using 2GCHAS. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 40:3–17
Theodore CR, Celi R (2002) Helicopter Flight Dynamic Simulation with Refined Aerodynamic and Flexible Blade Modeling. Journal of Aircraft, 39:577–586
Wachspress DA, Quackenbush TR, Boschitsch AH (2003) First-Principles Free-Vortex Wake Analysis for Helicopters and Tiltrotors. In: Proc. of the 59th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Phoenix, AZ
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bottasso, C.L., Croce, A., Leonello, D. (2007). Neural-Augmented Planning and Tracking Pilots for Maneuvering Multibody Dynamics. In: GarcÃa Orden, J.C., Goicolea, J.M., Cuadrado, J. (eds) Multibody Dynamics. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5684-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5684-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5683-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5684-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)