Skip to main content

Neural-Augmented Planning and Tracking Pilots for Maneuvering Multibody Dynamics

  • Conference paper
Multibody Dynamics

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 4))

Abstract

We propose a methodology for extending the applicability of multibody-based comprehensive analysis codes to the maneuvering regime, with specific application to the flight of rotorcraft vehicles.

Maneuvers are here mathematically described in a concise yet completely general form as optimal control problems, each maneuver being defined by a specific form of the cost function and by suitable constraints on the vehicle states and controls. In principle, by solving the maneuver optimal control problem, one could determine the trajectory and the control time histories that steer the vehicle model, while minimizing the cost and satisfying the constraints. Unfortunately, optimal control problems are prohibitively expensive to solve for detailed comprehensive models of rotorcraft vehicles denoted by a large number of structural degrees of freedom and possibly sophisticated aerodynamics.

In order to make the problem computationally tractable, our formulation makes use of two models of the same vehicle. A coarse level flight mechanics model is used for solving the trajectory optimal control problem. Being based on a reduced model of the vehicle with only a few degrees of freedom, the resulting non-linear multi-point boundary value problem is computationally feasible. Next, the fine scale comprehensive model is steered in closed loop, tracking the trajectory computed at the flight mechanics level using a receding horizon model predictive controller. This amounts to a standard time marching problem for the comprehensive model, which is therefore also computationally feasible. The flight mechanics model is iteratively updated for ensuring close matching of the trajectories flown by the two models, by resorting to a neural adaptive element. This two-level procedure enables the simulation using comprehensive models of arbitrary complexity of maneuvers of possibly long duration, with general constraints on the vehicle inputs and outputs.

The new procedures are demonstrated with the help of numerical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauchau OA, Bottasso CL, Nikishkov YG (2001) Modeling Rotorcraft Dynamics with Finite Element Multibody Procedures. Mathematics and Computer Modeling, 33:1113–1137

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauchau OA, Bottasso CL, Trainelli L (2003) Robust Integration Schemes for Flexible Multibody Systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 192:395–420

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauchau OA, Rodriguez J, Bottasso CL (2001) Modeling of Unilateral Contact Conditions with Application to Aerospace Systems Involving Backlash, Freeplay and Friction. Mechanics Research Communications, 28:571–599

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Betts JT (2001) Practical Methods for Optimal Control Using Non-Linear Programming. Philadelphia: SIAM

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhagwat MJ, Leishman JG (2001) Stability, Consistency and Convergence of Time Marching Free-Vortex Rotor Wake Algorithms. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 46:59–71

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bottasso CL (1997) A New Look at Finite Elements in Time: A Variational Interpretation of Runge-Kutta Methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 25:355–368

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bottasso CL, Bauchau OA (2001) Multibody Modeling of Engage and Disengage Operations of Helicopter Rotors. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 46:290–300

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bottasso CL, Bauchau OA (1999) On the Design of Energy Preserving and Decaying Schemes for Flexible, Nonlinear Multibody Systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 169:61–79

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bottasso CL, Chang C-S, Croce A, Leonello D, Riviello L (2004) Adaptive Planning and Tracking of Trajectories for the Simulation of Maneuvers with Multibody Models. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195:7052–7072

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bottasso CL, Croce A, Leonello D, Riviello L (2005) Optimization of Critical Trajectories for Rotorcraft Vehicles. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 50:165–177

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bottasso CL, Croce A, Leonello D, Riviello L (2005) Rotorcraft Trajectory Optimization with Realizability Considerations. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 18:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bottasso CL, Micheletti S, Sacco R (2002) The Discontinuous Petrov-Galerkin Method for Elliptic Problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191:3391–3409

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Bottasso CL, Riviello L (2005) Trimming of Multibody Rotorcraft Models by a Neural Model-Predictive Auto-Pilot. In: Proc. of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics, Madrid, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brentner KS, Perez G, Bres GA, Jones HE (2002) Toward a Better Understanding of Maneuvering Rotorcraft Noise. In: Proc. of the 58th American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bryson AE, Ho YC (1975) Applied Optimal Control. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carlson EB, Zhao YJ (2001) Optimal Short Takeoff of Tiltrotor Aircraft in One Engine Failure. Journal of Aircraft, 39:280–289

    Google Scholar 

  17. CHARM (Comprehensive Hierarchical Aeromechanics Rotorcraft Model). http://www.continuum-dynamics.com/products/charm/index.html. NJ: Continuum Dynamics, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Findeisen R, Imland L, Allgöwer F, Foss BA (2003) State and Output Feedback Nonlinear Model Predictive Control: An Overview. European Journal of Control, 9:190–207

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frazzoli E, Dahleh MA, Feron E (2000) A Hybrid Control Architecture for Aggressive Maneuvering of Autonomous Aerial Vehicles. In: System Theory: Modeling, Analysis and Control. Djaferis TE, Schick IC (Eds.). SECS 518. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson W (1992–1997) CAMRAD II, Comprehensive Analytical Model of Rotorcraft Aerodynamics and Dynamics. Palo Alto (CA): Johnson Aeronautics

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson W (1994) Helicopter Theory. New York: Dover Publications

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peters DA, He CJ (1995) Finite State Induced Flow Models. Part II: Three-Dimensional Rotor Disk. Journal of Aircraft, 32:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prasad JVR, Zhao J, Peters DA (2002) Helicopter Rotor Wake Distorsion Models for Maneuvering Flight. In: Proc. of the 28th European Rotorcraft Forum, Bristol, UK

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ribera M, Celi R (2004) Simulation Modeling of Unsteady Maneuvers Using a Time Accurate Free Wake. In: Proc. of the 60th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rutkowski M, Ruzicka GC, Ormiston RA, Saberi H, Jung Y (1995) Comprehensive Aeromechanics Analysis of Complex Rotorcraft Using 2GCHAS. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 40:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Theodore CR, Celi R (2002) Helicopter Flight Dynamic Simulation with Refined Aerodynamic and Flexible Blade Modeling. Journal of Aircraft, 39:577–586

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wachspress DA, Quackenbush TR, Boschitsch AH (2003) First-Principles Free-Vortex Wake Analysis for Helicopters and Tiltrotors. In: Proc. of the 59th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Phoenix, AZ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bottasso, C.L., Croce, A., Leonello, D. (2007). Neural-Augmented Planning and Tracking Pilots for Maneuvering Multibody Dynamics. In: García Orden, J.C., Goicolea, J.M., Cuadrado, J. (eds) Multibody Dynamics. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5684-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5684-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5683-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5684-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics