Skip to main content

Striving for What? Exploring the Pursuit of Prestige

  • Chapter
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research

Part of the book series: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 22))

Each year colleges and universities strive to increase their national standing in the academic hierarchy, and the behavior associated with this “striving” has taken many forms. In recent years research has examined the nature of such “striving” to frame how it might be studied, and to examine how striving impacts various aspects of institutional functioning, including but not limited to admissions, pricing/cost, faculty work-life, and educational quality. This Handbook chapter contributes to this growing area of research by synthesizing recent studies on striving to (a) better recognize striving institutions (b) understand the forces compelling striving (c) explore striving behaviors (d) examine possible consequences of institutional striving and (e) identify areas for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldersley, S. F. (1995). “Upward drift” is alive and well: Research/doctoral model still attractive to institutions. Change, 27(5), 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpert, D. (1985). Performance and paralysis: The organizational context of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education, 56(3), 241–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. D. (1997). Training the apostles of liberal culture: Black higher education 1900–1935. In L. F. Goodchild & H. S. Wechsler (Eds.), The history of higher education(2nd ed.). ASHE Reader Series (pp. 432–458). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W., & Chang, M. J. (1995). Colleges that emphasize research and teaching: Can you have your cake and eat it too? Change, 27(5), 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W., & Lee, C. B. T. (1972). The invisible colleges. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (in press). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXI, pp. 397–456). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, C., Fairbanks, A., & Zeckhauser, R. (2001). What worms for the early bird: Early admissions at elite colleges. KSG Working Paper No. RW PO1-049. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. O. (1985). Strategy and government: U.S. State systems and institutional role and mission. International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, 9(3), 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1983). Maintaining institutional diversity in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (2000, January/February). The life cycle of academic management fads. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1994). The organization of academic work (2nd ed.). London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1997). Reframing organizations (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. (1977). Investment in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R. (1980). The costs of higher education: How much do colleges and universities spend per students and how much should they spend? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, D. J., Gates, S. M., & Goldman, C. A. (2001). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, D. J., Gates, S. M., & Goldman, C. A. (2002). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. T. (1996). Buying the best: Cost escalation in elite higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Report. (2006, retrieved July 1). Commission on the Future of Higher Education. Washington, DC www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dichev, I. (2001). News or noise? Estimating the noise in the U.S. News university rankings. Research in Higher Education, 42, 237–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubrow, G., Moseley, B., & Dustin, D. (2006). Life at mission creep U. Academe, 92(3), 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G. (2000). Tuition rising: Why college costs so much. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G. (2003). Reaching for the brass ring: The U.S. News and World Report Rankings and Competition. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., Zhang, L., & Levin, J. M. (2006). Crafting a class: The Trade-off between merit scholarships and enrolling lower-income students. The Review of Higher Education, 29(2), 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, T. (2006). Choosing a college. Carnegie Perspectives. http://www. carnegiefoundation.org/perspectives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, E., Brewer, D. J., & Ehrenberg, D. G. (1998). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Evidence on the effects of undergraduate college quality on graduate school attendance. Economics of Education Review, 17(4), 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S. (1993). Academic values and faculty rewards. Review of Higher Education, 17(91), 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. (1983) From tutor to specialized scholar: Academic professionalization in eighteenth and nineteenth century America. History of Higher Education Annual, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, D. E. (1993). Segmentation in the academic labor market. Journal of Higher Education, 64(6), 621–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, D. E., & Gamson, Z. F. (1996). Disciplinary adaptations to research culture in comprehensive institutions. Review of Higher Education, 19(2), 141–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (1993). Research, graduate education and the ecology of American universities: An imperative history. The European and American University since 1800: Historical and Sociological Essays, (Eds.) Rothblatt, S., & Wittrock, B. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (1997). Research, graduate education and the ecology of American universities: An interpretive history. In L. F. Goodchild & H. S. Wechsler (Eds.), The History of Higher Education (2nd ed.). ASHE reader series (pp. 273–289). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (2004). Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, L. F. (1997). The turning point in American Jesuit higher education: The standardization controversy between the Jesuits and the North Central Association, 1915–1940. In L. F. Goodchild & H. S. Wechsler (Eds.), The history of higher education (2nd ed.). ASHE reader series (pp. 528–550). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, L. S. (Ed.). (2000, Spring). What contributes to job satisfaction among faculty and staff. New Directions for Institutional Research (Vol. 105). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, B. B., & Kane, W. D. (1991). Caught in the middle: Faculty and institutional status and quality in state comprehensive universities. Higher Education, 22, 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D. (2000). The problem with college rankings. About Campus, 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A. L., Walpole, M. B., & Perez, L. X. (1998). College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? Research in Higher Education, 39(5): 513–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1968). The academic revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., & Pascarella, E. T. (2004). What does institutional selectivity tell us about educational quality? Change, 36(5), 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachs, J. (1965, March). Graduate programmes in undergraduate colleges. Journal of Higher Education, 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J., & Rhoads, J. A. (2003). Faculty entrepreneurialism and the challenge to undergraduate education. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, C. M. (2005). The perils of pursuing prestige. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(20), B20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machung, A. (1998, July/August). Playing the rankings game. Change, 30(4), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W. F., & Zemsky, R. (1994). Faculty discretionary time. Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C. (2005). A new set of lenses for looking at colleges and universities. Perspectives. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/perspectives/sub.asp?key=245&subkey=882.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., & Schapiro, M. (1999). The future economic challenges to liberal arts colleges. Daedalus, 128(1), 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, M. (2004). Why do universities compete in the ratings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the U.S. News and World Report college rankings. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milem, J. F., Berger, J. B., & Dey, E. L. (2000). Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 454–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monks, J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999a, November/December). U.S. News and World Report rankings: Why they do matter. Change, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monks, J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999b). The impact of U.S. News & World Report college rankings on admissions outcomes and pricing policies at selective private institutions. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C. (2000). The Realities of strategic planning: Program termination at East Central University. Review of Higher Education, 23(3), 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C. (2005). Conceptualizing change in the institutional diversity of U.S. colleges and universities. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C. (2002). A rose by any other name: Which colleges became universities. Review of Higher Education, 25(2), 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Baker, B. D. (2004). The cost of prestige: Do new research one universities incur increased administrative costs? Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 365–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Huisman, J. (2002). Using institutional theory to reframe research on academic drift. Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Jenniskens, C. G. M. (1999). Assessing institutional change at the level of the faculty: Examining faculty motivators and new degree programs. In B. Jong, P. Bloed, P. Maassen, & G. Neave (Eds.). From the eye of the storm: Higher educations changing institution (pp. 95–120). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Deal, T. E. (1981). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations. In H. D. Stein (Ed.), Organization and the Human Services. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogren, C. A. (1995). Where coeds were coeducated: Normal schools in Wisconsin, 1870–1920. History of Education Quarterly, 35, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K., & Bloomgarden, A. (2006). The Cost of Prestige. Unpublished paper. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K., Terosky, A., & Neumann, A. (2006). Unpublished proposal for ASHE-ERIC report, University of Massachusetts. Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C. W., & O’Donnell, M. L. (2006). Some observations on the federal regulation of higher education. Issue paper released by the Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affect students: A third decade of research (Vol 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (2004). Measuring quality: A Comparison of U.S. News rankings and NSEE benchmarks. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postman, N. (1995). The End of education: Redefining the value of school. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B. (2004). Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. [Review of the book Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace]. Academe, 90(6), 115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & Austin, A. E. (2000). Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation. New Pathways Inquiry No. 7. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (2002). The Future of Success: Working and Living in the new Economy. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, D. (1956). Constraint and variety in American education. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, K. P. (1987). The distinctive scholarship of the selective liberal arts college. Journal of Higher Education, 58(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarraf, S., Hayek, J., Kandiko, C., Padgett, R., & Harris, K. (2005, November 18). The institutional quality debate: U.S. News Quality indicators and the National Survey of Student Engagement. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, R. E., & Stickler, W. H. (1965, Summer). Vertical extension of academic programs in institutions of higher education. Educational Record, 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J., & Finkelstein, M. (2006). The American Faculty: The restructuring of Academic work and careers. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, K. M., & LeChasseur, K. (2005). Shifting missions at an urban university: The trade-off between equity and excellence. Symposium presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Silva, E. (1985). Towards a political economy of retrenchment: The American public research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 8(4), 295–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadtman, V. A. (1980). Academic adaptations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweitzer, K., & Volkwein, J. (2005, November). The Influences on prestige and reputation at research universities and liberal arts colleges. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelin, J. (2004). A History of American higher education. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, J. F., & Sweitzer, K. V. (2006). The influences on prestige and reputation at research universities and liberal arts colleges. Research in Higher Education, 47(2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2003, November). Academic life and motherhood: Variations by institutional type. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wawrzynski, M. (2004, November). The impact of faculty behaviors on student engagement. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Kansas City, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, T. (2001). A principal component analysis of the U.S. News and World report tier rankings of colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 20(3), 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G. (2000, April). The positional arms race in higher education. Williams Project on the Economy of higher education, Discussion Paper 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf-Wendel, L., & Ward, K. (2005, November). Faculty life at comprehensives: Between a rock and a hard place. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R. (1990). The lattice and the ratchet. Policy Perspectives, 2(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R., Wegner, G., & Massy, W. (2005, July 15). Today’s colleges must be market smart and mission centered. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meara, K.O. (2007). Striving for What? Exploring the Pursuit of Prestige. In: Smart, J.C. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5666-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics