Skip to main content

WILLINGNESS TO INNOVATE

Use, Misuse, and Abuse of Student Evaluations of Instruction

  • Chapter
Book cover The Challenges of Educating People to Lead in a Challenging World

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the potential implications of commonly used student ratings of teacher performance on faculty members’ willingness to pursue innovative educational practices. Our fundamental contention is that student ratings of teaching are potentially detrimental to innovative education. In exploring this fundamental contention, we first examine the inherent evaluation and developmental challenges associated with student ratings. Next, we discuss the common uses, misuses, and abuses of student ratings from both an evaluative perspective and a developmental perspective. We then propose an alternative approach — one based on behaviorally anchored rating scales — for utilizing student ratings. This proposed approach can potentially limit the misuses and abuses of student ratings, and can promote their viability as useful and accepted tools for both evaluative and developmental purposes, especially for the latter. Finally, we conclude the paper with a statement of our beliefs regarding the dangers associated with adhering to a student-as-customer mode of teacher ratings — dangers which can discourage innovative educational efforts and pervert the educational process as well as undermine students’ acquisition of the competencies they will need to function effectively in modern society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bures, A. L., De Ridder, J. J., & Tong, H. M. (1990). An empirical study of accounting faculty evaluation systems. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, W. E. (1983). Concerns about using student ratings in community colleges. New Directions for Community Colleges, 11, 1, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective Faculty Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Hoshower, L. B. (2003). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 1, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, L. F., Christ, M. Y., Graham, A. S., McCuddy, M. K., & Pirie, W. L. (2004). Using team learning in the classroom: Experiences and lessons. In R. Ottewill, L. Borredon, L. Falque, B. Macfarlane, & A. Wall (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business VIII: Pedagogy, Technology and Innovation (pp. 129–146). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, S. M., & Talbot, D. M. (2001). Understanding student evaluations. College Teaching, 49, 1, 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppes, S., & Chesbro, S. (2003). Elements of instruction in allied health: Do Faculty and students value the same things? Journal of Allied Health, 32, 3, 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (2000). Action Learning and Action Research: Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 769–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolitch, E., & Dean, A. V. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in the USA: Hidden assumptions and missing conceptions about ’good’ teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 1, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstoe, O. P. (1975). College Professoring: Or Through Academia with Gun and Camera. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowman, J. (1984). Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R. (1998). Evaluating faculty based on student opinions: Problems, implications and recommendations from Deming’s theory of management perspective. Issues in Accounting Education, 13, 4, 1079–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1997). Student ratings: The validity of use. American Psychologist, 52, 1218–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J. D. (1988). Using student evaluation of teaching in administrative control: The validity problem. Journal of Accounting Education, 6, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. J. (1998). The Courage to Teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penny, A. R. (2003). Changing the agenda for research into students’ views about university teaching: Four shortcomings of SRT research, Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 3, 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckers, M. P. (1996). Know thy customer. Journal of Accounting Education, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroyan, A., & Amundsen, C. (2001). Evaluating university teaching: Time to take stock. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 4, 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Hanges, P. J., Goldstein, H. W., & Braverman, E. P. (1994). Do customer service perceptions generalize? The case of student and chair ratings of faculty effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 685–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, P. (1993). The use and abuse of student evaluation of professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 40, 1, A40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P. M., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Student evaluations of teaching: An exploratory study of the faculty response. Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 3, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamblyn, P. (2000). Qualities of success: Lessons from a teaching career. Education Canada, 40, 1, 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenfeld, K. (1996). Making the grade. Newsweek, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (1998). New research casts doubt on value of student evaluations. Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, 19, A12+.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., Whittenton, R., & Whittenberg, G. E. (1984). Student ratings of teaching effectiveness: What the research reveals. Journal of Accounting Education, 2, 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarra III, E. J. (2003). Taking it to the next level: Components of excellent secondary educators. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCuddy, M.K., Pirie, W.L. (2007). WILLINGNESS TO INNOVATE. In: McCuddy, M.K., van den Bosch, H., Martz, W.B., Matveev, A.V., Morse, K.O. (eds) The Challenges of Educating People to Lead in a Challenging World. Educational Innovation in Economics and Business, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5612-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics