Skip to main content

Abstract

In order to determine the mechanical resistance of several forest tree species to rockfall, an inventory of the type of damage sustained in an active rockfall corridor was carried out in the French Alps. The diameter, spatial position and type of damage incurred were measured in 423 trees. Only 5% of trees had sustained damage above a height of 1.3 m and in damaged trees, 66% of broken or uprooted trees were conifers. Larger trees were more likely to be wounded or dead than smaller trees, although the size of the wounds was relatively smaller in larger trees. The species with the least proportion of damage through stem breakage, uprooting or wounding was European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Winching tests were carried out on two conifer species, Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) and Silver fir (Abies alba Mill.), as well as European beech, in order to verify the hypothesis that beech was highly resistant to rockfall and that conifers were more susceptible to uprooting or stem breakage. Nineteen trees were winched downhill and the force necessary to cause failure was measured. The energy (E fail) required to break or uproot a tree was then calculated. Most Silver fir trees failed in the stem and Norway spruce usually failed through uprooting. European beech was either uprooted or broke in the stem and was twice as resistant to failure as Silver fir, and three times more resistant than Norway spruce. E fail was strongly related to stem diameter in European beech only, and was significantly higher in this species compared to Norway spruce. Results suggest that European beech would be a better species to plant with regards to protection against rockfall. Nevertheless, all types of different abiotic stresses on any particular alpine site should be considered by the forest manager, as planting only broadleaf species may compromise the protecting capacity of the forest, e.g., in the case of snow avalanches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerholm M, Hinterstoisser B and Salmen L 2004 Characterization of the crystalline structure of cellulose using static and dynamic FT-IR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Res. 339, 569–578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M G and Richards K S 1987 Slope Stability: Geotechnical Engineering and Geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester, 585 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Serimaa R, Paakkari T, Saranpaa P and Pesonen E 2003 Crystallinity of wood and the size of cellulose crystallites in Norway spruce (Picea abies). WJ. Wood Sci. 49, 531–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer R 1986 Growth Stresses and Strains in Trees. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 240 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazant Z P and Kazemi M T 1990 Size effect in fracture of ceramics, its use to determine fracture energy and effective process zone length. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1841–1853.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bischetti G B, Chiaradia E A, Simonato T, Speziali B, Vitali B, Vullo P and Zocco A 2005 Root strength and root area of forest species in Lombardy (Northern Italy). Plant Soil 278, 11–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burroughs E R and Thomas B R 1977 Declining root strength in Douglas fir after felling as a factor in slope stability. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper INT-19027pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell K A and Hawkins C D B 2003 Paper birch and lodgepole pine root reinforcement in coarse-, medium-, and fine-, textured soils. Can. J. For. Res. 33, 1580–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiatante D, Scippa S G, Di Iorio A and Sarnataro M 2003 The influence of steep slopes on root system development. J. Plant Growth Regul. 21, 247–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Commandeur P R and Pyles M R 1991 Modulus of elasticity and tensile strength of Douglas fir roots. Can. J. For. Res. 21, 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppin N J and Richards I G 1990 Use of Vegetation in Civil Engineering. Butterworth, London 272 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutts M P 1983 Root architecture and tree stability. Plant Soil 71, 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cucchi V, Meredieu C, Stokes A, Berthier S, Bert D and Najar M 2004 Root anchorage of inner and edge trees of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait) growing in different soil podzolic conditions. Trees-Struct. Funct. 18, 460–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmer D P and Amor Y 1995 Cellulose Biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7, 987–1000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy L, Fourcaud T and Stokes A 2005a A numerical investigation into factors affecting the anchorage of roots in tension. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 56, 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A 2005b A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant Soil 278, 119–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos A R 2000 The mechanics of root anchorage. Adv. Bot. Res. 33, 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos A R and Fitter A H 1992 Comparative functional morphology of the anchorage systems of annual dicots. Funct. Ecol. 6, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitter A H and Stickland T R 1991 Architectural analysis of plant root systems 2. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species. New Phytol. 118, 383–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersani M and Sachs T 1992 Development correlations between roots in heterogeneous environments. Plant Cell. Environ. 15, 463–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman A M and Ennos A R 1999 The effects of soil bulk density on the morphology and anchorage mechanics of the root systems of sunflower and maize. Ann. Bot. (London) 83, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray D H and Sotir R D 1996 Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization. Wiley, New York, 369 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenway D R 1987 Vegetation and slope stability. In Slope Stability. Ed. M G Anderson. pp. 187–230. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood J R, Vickers A W, Morgan R P C, Coppin N J, Norris J E, 2001 Bio-engineering: The Longham Wood Cutting field trial. CIRIA Project Report 81, London. 122 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber F 1994 Morphology of coniferous trees: possible effects of soil acidification on morphology of Norway spruce and Silver fir. In DL Godbold and A Huttermann (eds), Effects of Acid Rain on Forest Processes. pp. 265–324. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamza O, Bengough A G, Bransby M F, Davies M C R and Hallett P D 2007 Mechanics of root-pullout from soil: a novel image and stress analysis procedure. In A Stokes, I Spanos, JE Norris and LH Cammeraat (eds), Eco- and Ground Bio-Engineering: The Use of Vegetation to Improve Slope Stability. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 103, pp. 213–221. Springer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway R L and Penny D 1975 Root strength in some Populus and Salix clones. New Zeal J. Bot. 13, 333–343.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerstens S, Decraemer W F and Verbelen J P 2001 Cell walls at the plant surface behave mechanically like fiber reinforced composite materials. Plant Physiol. 127, 381–385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Köstler J N, Bruckner E and Bibelriether H 1968 Die Wurzeln der Walbäume. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie der Walbäume in Mitteleuropa, 284 pp. Verlag, Hamburg and Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrot C and Porté A 2000 Amélioration du protocole d’extraction de la cellulose et de l’holocellulose du bois: verification de l’absence d’un effet contaminant sur les valeurs de composition isotopique du carbone dans les cernes du bois. Cah. Techn. I.N.R.A. 45, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt S W and Danzer S R 1993 Method for batch processing small wood samples to holocellulose for stable-carbon isotope analysis. Anal. Chem. 65, 87–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström A and Rune G 1999 Root deformation in plantations of container-grown Scots pine trees: effects on root growth, tree stability and stem straightness. Plant Soil 217, 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niklas K J 1992 Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function, 607 pp. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilaweera N S and Nutalaya P 1999 Role of tree roots in slope stabilisation. Bull. Eng. Geol. Env. 57, 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris J E 2005 Root reinforcement by hawthorn and oak roots on a highway cut-slope in Southern England. Plant Soil 278, 43–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Loughlin C L and Watson A J 1979 Root-wood strength deterioration in radiata pine after clearfelling. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 9, 284–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Operstein V and Frydman S 2000 The influence of vegetation on soil strength. Ground Improvement 4, 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips C J and Watson A J 1994 Structural tree root research in New Zealand: A review. Landcare Res. Sci. Ser. 7, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roering J J, Schmidt K M, Stock J D, Dietrich W E and Montgomery D R 2003 Shallow land sliding, root reinforcement, and the spatial distribution of trees in the Oregon Coast Range. Can. Geotech. J. 40, 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiechtl H M 1980 Bioengineering for Land Reclamation and Conservation, 404 pp. Edmonton Alberta, University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K M, Roering J J, Stock J D, Dietrich W E, Montgomery D R and Schaub T 2001 Root cohesion variability and shallow landslide susceptibility in the Oregon Coast Range. Can. Geotech. J. 38, 995–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha M B, Horiuchi M, Yamadera Y and Miyazaki T 2000 A study on the adaptability mechanism of tree roots on steep slopes. In A Stokes (ed), The Supporting Roots of Trees and Woody Plants: Form, Function and Physiology. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, pp. 51–57. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjostrom E 1993 Wood Chemistry Fundamentals and Applications, 293 pp. 2nd edition Academic Press Inc, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A, Drexage M and Guitard D 2000 A method for predicting the possible site of failure in trees during mechanical loading. In A Stokes (ed), The Supporting Roots of Trees and Woody Plants: Form, Function and Physiology. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, pp. 279–285. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A 2002 Biomechanics of tree root anchorage. In Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkai (eds), Plant Roots: The Hidden Half Part, pp. 175–186. Marcel Dekker, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A, Salin F, Kokutse A D, Berthier S, Jeannin H, Mochan S, Kokutse N, Dorren L, Abd.Ghani M and Fourcaud T 2005 Mechanical resistance of different tree species to rockfall in the French Alps. Plant Soil 278, 107–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turmanina V 1965 On the strength of tree roots. Bull. Moscow Soc. Naturalists, Biol. Sec. 70, 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu T H 1976 Investigation of landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Ohio State Univ., Dept. of Civil Eng., Geotech. Eng. Rpt. N5, 93 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu T H 2007 Root reinforcement analyses and experiments. In A Stokes, I Spanos, JE Norris, LH Cammeraat (eds), Eco-and Ground Bio-Engineering: The Use of Vegetation to Improve Slope Stability. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. Vol. 103, pp. 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemer R R, 1981 Roots and the stability of forested slopes IAHS Publication 132, 343–357.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

ALEXIA STOKES IOANNIS SPANOS JOANNE E. NORRIS ERIK CAMMERAAT

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Genet, M. et al. (2007). The influence of cellulose content on tensile strength in tree roots. In: STOKES, A., SPANOS, I., NORRIS, J.E., CAMMERAAT, E. (eds) Eco-and Ground Bio-Engineering: The Use of Vegetation to Improve Slope Stability. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 103. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5593-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics