Abstract
A central concern in science pedagogy is that of addressing the issue of science making sense and having meaning for the learner. The mechanism and structure of how individuals access knowledge and construct meaning have formed the focus of research into the congruence of the learner’s interpretation of phenomena with that of scientific explanations. The problem of meaning, concerned with the communication of science knowledge in science education discourse, raises the central issue of language, and this has become increasingly significant in contemporary debate within science education research (see e.g. Carlsen 2007). In particular, socio-cultural theorists’ claims that learning science is a discursive process (Mercer et al. 2004) derived from the traditions of Vygotsky (1978) conceptualise language as a tool for reasoning. In this chapter, we explore this perspective in relation to the presentation of science knowledge in the science curriculum and examine the epistemological notions that both implicitly and explicitly underpin this. We offer exemplification from practice which questions the idea that through language, we can somehow access the world directly to determine what there really is ‘out there’. In challenging the perception that language is a tool that is applied to developing an understanding of concepts encountered in learning science, there is a subtle shift in emphasis from the idea that reality is ‘out there’ as phenomena reflected in language, towards a notion that reality is produced by language; an ontology compatible with a dialogic in which meaning is derived in discourse between teacher and learner and through peer group interaction.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bendall, S., Goldberg, F., & Galili, I. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers’ prior knowledge about light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1169-1187.
Black, P. J., & Harlen, W. (1993). How can we specify concepts for primary science ? In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children’s informal ideas in science (pp. 208-229). London: Routledge.
Brown, T. (2001). Mathematics education and language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Carlsen, W. S. (2007). Language and science learning. In S. K. Abel & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 57-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coward, R., & Ellis, J. (1993). Language and materialism. London: Routledge.
Cutler, J. (2000). Literary theory. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eagleton, T. (1997). Literary theory. An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eger, M. (1993). Hermeneutics as an approach to science: Part 2. Science and Education, 2(4), 303-328.
Eger, M. (2006). Science, understanding and justice: The philosophical essays of Martin Eger. In A. Shimony (Ed.). Chicago, IL: Open Court
Gadamer, H. G. (1993). Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward.
Galili, I. (1996). Students’ conceptual change in geometrical optics. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 847-868.
Galili, I., Bendall, S., & Goldberg, F. (1993). The effects of prior knowledge and instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 271-301.
Galili, I., & Hazon, A. (2000). Learners’ knowledge in optics: Interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88.
Gallagher, S. (1992a). Hermeneutics and education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Gallagher, S. (1992b). Language and the imperfect consensus. In T. W. Busch & S. Gallagher (Eds.), Merleau-Pony, hermeneutics and postmodernism (pp. 69-79). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Goldberg, F., & McDermott, L. C. (1986). Student difficulties in understanding image formation by a plane mirror. The Physics Teacher, 24, 472-480.
Goldberg, F., & McDermott, L. C. (1987). An investigation of student understanding of the real image formed by a converging lens or a concave mirror. American Journal of Physics, 55, 108-119.
Guesne, E. (1985). Light. In R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 10-32). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Harland, R. (1994). Superstructuralism. London: Routledge.
Hewitt, P. G. (1989). Conceptual physics. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins.
Heywood, D. (2005). Primary trainee teachers’ learning and teaching about light: some pedagogical implications for initial teacher training. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1447-1475.
Heywood, D., & Stronach, I. (2005). Philosophy and hermeneutics. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 114-120). London: Sage.
Jones, E. M. (1999). Critical pedagogy: an impossible task? Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.
Langley, D., Ronen, M., & Elyon, B. (1997). Light propagation and visual patterns: Pre instruction learners’ conceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 399-424.
McNamara, O. (1995). The construction of knowledge in mathematics education. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.
Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359-377.
Minstrell, J. (1992). Facets of students’ knowledge and relevant instruction. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Neidderer, (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 110-128). Kiel: Kiel, Germany: IPN-Leibniz Institute for Science Education.
Rowlands, M. A. (2006). What is buoyancy force? Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 39-42.
de Saussure, F. (1966). A course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sturrock, J. (1993). Structuralism. London: Fontana.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wegerif, R. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumption in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 347-361.
Bendall, S., Goldberg, F., & Galili, I. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers’ prior knowledge about light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1169-1187.
Black, P. J., & Harlen, W. (1993). How can we specify concepts for primary science ? In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children’s informal ideas in science (pp. 208-229). London: Routledge.
Brown, T. (2001). Mathematics education and language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Carlsen, W. S. (2007). Language and science learning. In S. K. Abel & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 57-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cutler, J. (2000). Literary theory. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eagleton, T. (1997). Literary theory. An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eger, M. (1992a). Hermeneutics and science education: An introduction. Science and Education, 1, 337-348.
Eger, M. (2006). Science, understanding and justice: The philosophical essays of Martin Eger. In A. Shimony (Ed.). Chicago, IL: Open Court
Gadamer, H. G. (1993). Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward.
Galili, I. (1996). Students’ conceptual change in geometrical optics. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 847-868.
Galili, I., Bendall, S., & Goldberg, F. (1993). The effects of prior knowledge and instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 271-301.
Galili, I., & Hazon, A. (2000). Learners’ knowledge in optics: Interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88.
Goldberg, F., & McDermott, L. C. (1986). Student difficulties in understanding image formation by a plane mirror. The Physics Teacher, 24, 472-480.
Goldberg, F., & McDermott, L. C. (1987). An investigation of student understanding of the real image formed by a converging lens or a concave mirror. American Journal of Physics, 55, 108-119.
Gregory, B. (1988). Inventing reality. Physics as language. New York: Wiley.
Harland, R. (1994). Superstructuralism. London: Routledge.
Hewitt, P. G. (1989). Conceptual physics. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins.
Heywood, D. (2005). Primary trainee teachers’ learning and teaching about light: some pedagogical implications for initial teacher training. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1447-1475.
Heywood, D., & Stronach, I. (2005). Philosophy and hermeneutics. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 114-120). London: Sage.
Jones, E. M. (1999). Critical pedagogy: an impossible task? Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.
Langley, D., Ronen, M., & Elyon, B. (1997). Light propagation and visual patterns: Pre instruction learners’ conceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 399-424.
McNamara, O. (1995). The construction of knowledge in mathematics education. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.
Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359-377.
Minstrell, J. (1992). Facets of students’ knowledge and relevant instruction. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Neidderer, (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 110-128). Kiel: Kiel, Germany: IPN-Leibniz Institute for Science Education.
Rowlands, M. A. (2006). What is buoyancy force? Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 39-42.
Sturrock, J. (1993). Structuralism. London: Fontana.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London: Routledge.
Wegerif, R. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumption in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 347-361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heywood, D., Parker, J. (2009). Language Interpretation and Meaning. In: The Pedagogy of Physical Science. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5271-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5271-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5270-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5271-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)