Abstract
Complex science phenomena are often described with visual imagery. Research has shown that visual representations are not only motivating but are also critical in the communication of science concepts (citeauthorch12:mathewson1999, citeyearch12:mathewson1999). Yet very little is known about how students with little or no vision learn without access to these representations. This chapter explores how students with visual impairment learn science concepts. Through interviews with students with visual impairments, we explore concepts that are most difficult for these students to learn. The mental representations of science concepts that students with blindness build are discussed as well as the role of passive and active visuospatial processes. In addition, we describe new haptic tools that can be used to design instruction that is accessible to those students that are sighted as well as those that have visual impairments. Finally this chapter outlines the types of future research that are needed to more fully meet the challenge of providing high quality, accessible science instruction to students with visual impairments.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Federation for the Blind. (2003). Blindness statistics. Retrieved August 15, 2006 from: www.afb.gov.
Brooks, F. P., Ouh-Young, M., Batter, J. J., & Kilpatrick, P. J. (1990). Project GROPE-Haptic displays for scientific visualization. ACM Computer Graphics, 24, 177–185.
Burton, H., Snyder, A., Conturo, T., Akbudak, E., Ollinger, J., & Raichle, M. (2002a) Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a fMRI study of Braille reading. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 589–611. Retrived from http://jn.physiology.org.
Burton, H., Snyder, A., Diamond, J., Raichle, M. (2002b) Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a fMRI study of verb generation to heard nouns. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 3359–3371. Retrived from http://jn.physiology.org.
Burton, H. (2003). Visual cortex activity in early and late blind people. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(10), 4005–4011.
Cornoldi, C., & Vecchi, T. (2000). Mental imagery in blind people: The role of passive and active visuo-spatial processes. In M. Heller (Ed.), Touch, representation, and blindness (pp. 143–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
D’Angiulli, A., Kennedy, J. M., & Heller, M. A. (1998). Blind children recognizing tactile pictures respond like sighted children given guidance in exploration. Scandanavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 187–190.
Duckett, P., & Pratt, R. (2001). The Researched Opinions on Research: visually impaired people and visual impairment research. Disability and Society, 16(6), 815–835.
Ferk, V., Vrtacnik, M., Blejec, A., & Gril, A. (2003). Students’ understanding of molecular structure representations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1227–1245.
Hayward, V., Oliver, R. A., Cruz-Hernandez, M., Grant, D., & Robles-De-La-Torre, G. (2004). Haptic interfaces and devices. Sensor Review, 24, 16–29.
Heller, M., Brackett, D., Scroggs, E., Steffen, H., Heatherly, K., & Salik, S. (2002). Tangible pictures: Viewpoint effects and linear perspective in visually impaired people. Perception, 31, 747–769.
Holden, C. (1998). Leveling the playing field for scientists with disabilities. Science, 282, 36–37.
Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Kubsko, D., Bokinsky, A., Tretter, T., Negishi, A., et al. (2004). Remote Atomic Force Microscopy of microscopic organisms: Technological innovations for hands-on science with middle and high school students. Science Education, 88, 55–70.
Jones, M., Bokinsky, A., Tretter, T., & Negishi, A. (2005, May 2). A comparison of learning with haptic and visual modalities. Haptics-e The Electronic Journal of Haptics Research [Online], 3(5). Retrieved on Augusts 14, 2006 from: http://albion.ee.washington.edu/he/ojs/viewarticle.php?id=44.
Jones, M. G., Minogue, J., Tretter, T., Negishi, A., & Taylor, R. (2006). Haptic augmentation of science instruction: Does touch matter? Science Education, 90, 111–123.
Jones, M. G., Minogue, J., Oppewal, T., Cook, M., & Broadwell, B. (2006). Visualizing without vision at the microscale: Students with visual impairment explore cells with touch. Journal of Science Education and Technology 15, 1573–1589.
Kennedy, J. (2003). Drawings from Gaia, a blind girl. Perception, 32, 321–340.
Kosslyn, S., Thompson, W., & Ganis, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mathewson, J. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83, 33–54.
Mathewson, J. (2005). The visual core of science: Definition and applications to education. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 529–548.
Minogue, J., Jones, M. G., & Broadwell, J. (2006). Exploring cells from inside out: New tools for the classroom. Science Scope, 29(6), 28–32.
National Eye Institute. (2006). A Report of the National Advisory Council: Report of the Visual Impairment and its Rehabilitation Panel.Retrieved August 15, 2006, from http://www.nei.nih.gov/strategicplans/neiplan/
National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation. (2004). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (NSF 04–317).
Salisbury, K., Brock, D., Massie, T., Swarup, N., & Zilles, C. (1995). Haptic rendering: Programming touch interaction with virtual objects. Proc. Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, ACM. pp. 123–130.
Sathian, K., & Zangaladze, A. (2002). Feeling with the mind’s eye: Contribution of visual cortex to tactile perception. Behavior Brain Research, 135, 127–132.
Shepard, R., & Cooper, L. (1992). Representation of colors in the blind, color-blind, and normally sighted. Psychological Science, 3, 97–104.
van Sommeren, M., Reimann, P., Boshuizen, H., & Jong, T. D. (Eds.). (1998). Learning with multiple representations. Amsterdam: Permagon.
Vecchi, T., Monticelli, M., & Cornoldi, C. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory: Structures and variables affecting a capacity measure. Neuropsuchologia, 33, 1549–1564.
Zimler, J., & Keenan, J. (1983). Imagery in the congenitally blind: How visual are visual images? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 269–282.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, M.G., Broadwell, B. (2008). Visualization Without Vision: Students with Visual. In: Gilbert, J.K., Reiner, M., Nakhleh, M. (eds) Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5266-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5267-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)