Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Forest Diversity and Management pp 3–33Cite as

Dynamics in natural mixed-beech forest of the Upper Vosges

  • Chapter

  • 1462 Accesses

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 2))

Abstract

Forest dynamics were analysed in the Upper Vosges mountains of north-eastern France in two reserve areas, Frankenthal-Missheimle (FM) and Grand Ventron (GV), located in the Ballons des Vosges Natural Regional Park (Parc Naturel Régional des Ballons des Vosges). Two plots of 3000 m2 each were established in mixed beech woodlands located just below sub-alpine beech forests for long-term monitoring. The main aim of the study was to interpret how the different species populations in mixed-beech woodlands in the Vosges grow and interact over the long term, and to determine the disturbance history. The study combined vegetation description, dendrological and structural data, architectural descriptions and drawings and light distribution and soil analysis. Historical information was also taken into consideration. Soils in the two plots showed available phosphate P values > 0.14 g kg−1, indicating good levels of phosphorus supply for plants, except for A1/C horizon (1Va soil) which corresponds to a medium-fertility soil. However, soils were found to be shallow because of the slope, a factor that may limit water availability for adult trees and seedlings. As the canopy (composed of existing trees) consists of shade trees, the growth rates for seedlings and saplings (potential trees) depends on the canopy architecture: when growing in sunlit gaps, saplings reach full daylight (canopy height) in less than 100 years. When developing in shade (suppressed state), saplings may need up to 150 years before reaching full daylight. Alternating periods of rapid and slow growth explain why some trees present a wide range of stem diameters and ages in the area leading up to the canopy (some trees are more than 300-years-old), in contrast with the relatively homogeneous height classes distribution, indicating suppression periods. Trees in the FM and GV plots were found to have different growth rates. Both study plots developed with similar past disturbance events, the two most important being at the beginning of the 18th century. In addition, the forests were regularly affected by smaller disturbances until present. Because of the spatial heterogeneity and large range of ages represented, the forest stands within the two natural reserve areas are presently considered to be the best-preserved sites in the upper Vosges, but their situation near the timber line prevents them from becoming models for forest management at lower altitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker M. 1985. Le dépérissement du sapin dans les Vosges. Quelques facteurs liés à la détérioration des cîmes. Revue Forestièwre Française 37: 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker M. 1989. The role of climate on present and past vitality of silver fir forests in the Vosges mountains of northeastern France. Can. J. Forest. Res. 19: 1110–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogenrieder A. 2001. Schwarzwald und Vogesen-ein vegetationskundlicher Vergleich. Mitteilungen des Badischen Landesvereins für Naturkunde und Naturschutz 17: 745–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneau M. 1995. Fertilisation des forêts dans les pays tempérés. ENGREF, Nancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneau M., Faivre P., Gury M., Hétier J.M. and Le Tacon F. 1978. Carte pédologique de la France à 1/100000. Notice explicative, Saint-Dié. INRA, Service d’Etude des Sols et de la Carte Pédologique de la France, pp. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw R. and Holmqvist B. 1999. Danish forest development during the last 3000 years reconstructed from regional pollen data. Ecography 22: 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brethes A., Brun J.J., Jabiol B., Ponge J.F. and Toutain F. 1992. Typologie des formes d’humus. In: Baize D. and Girard M.C.R (eds), éférentiel Pédologique, Association Française pour l’Etude du sol. INRA, Paris, pp. 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbiener R. 1966. La végétation des Hautes Vosges dans ses rapports avec les climats locaux, les sols et la géomorphologie. Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat, University of Orsay, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cenusa R. 2001. Les montagnes de Calimani. Les forêts vierges de Roumanie, Giurgieu, Donita, Bandku, Radu, Cenusa, Dissescu, Stoiculescu, Biris. ASBL Forêt wallone, pp.179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon R.L. and Pearcy R.W. 1986. Photosynthetic light environments in a lowland and tropical rain forest in Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 72: 533–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Closset D. and Schnitzler A. 2000a. Naturalité de la hêtraie d’altitude dans la Réserve naturelle du Frankenthat Missheimle. University of Metz-Parc Naturel Régional des Ballons des Vosges. Internal Report 37p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Closset D. 2000. Sylvigénèse et naturalitéde la hêtraie d’altitude dans la Réserve Naturelle du Frankenthal-Missheimle. DEA Sciences Agronomiques, University of Metz.

    Google Scholar 

  • COST Action E4 EU 1999. (European corporation in science and technology) Forest Research Network Final report. Mission, goals, outputs, recommendations, linkage and patterns. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denslow J.S., Schultz J.C., Vitousek P.M. and Strain B.R. 1990. Growth responses of tropical shrubs to treefall gap environments. Ecology 71: 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchaufour P. and Bonneau M. 1959. Une nouvelle méthode de dosage du phosphore assimilable dans les sols forestiers. Bulletin de l’Association Française pour l’étude du sol 4: 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelin C. 1977. Images de làrchitecture des conifères. PhD thesis, University of Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H. 1988. Vegetation of Middle Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks D.A. and McNaughton F. 1991. Stability increases with diversity in plant communities: empirical evidence from the 1988 Yellowstone drought. Oikos 62: 360–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazer G.W., Canham C.D. and Lertzman K.P. 1999. Gap Light Analyser (GLA), Version 2.0: Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, User’s Manual and Program Documentation. Copyright 1999: Simo, Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, and Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E. 1994. L’homme et son milieu: le massif du Grand Ventron à travers les âges. Parc Naturel Régional des Ballons des Vosges, Internal Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E. 1998. Jalons pour une histoire de l’environnement: la réserve naturelle du Frankenthal-Missheimle. Relations des sociétés et du milieu. Parc Naturel Régional des Ballons des Vosges, Internal report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilg O. 1997. Eléments d’évaluation de la naturalitédes écosystèmes forestiers vosgiens. Eléments conceptuels et méthodologiques, application aux hêtraies-sapinières de la réserve naturelle du massif du Grand Ventron, DEA, University of Aix Marseille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish T.J. 1984. Leaf and canopy adaptations in tropical forests. In: Medina E., Mooney H.A. and Vasques-Yanes C. (eds), Physiological Ecology of Plants of the Wet Tropics. Junk, The Hague, pp. 51–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé F. and Oldeman R.A.A. 1970. Essai sur l’architecture et la dynamique de croissance des arbres tropicaux. Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé F., Oldeman R.A.A and Tomlinson PB. 1978. Tropical Trees and Forests: An Architectural Analysis. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helle T. and Järvinen O. 1986. Population trends in North Finnish land birds in relation to their habitat selection and changes in forest structures. Oikos 46: 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuzé P. 2002. Impact à moyen terme des grands herbivores sur la hêtraie-sapinière vosgienne. PhD Thesis, University of Metz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones E. W. 1945. The structure and reproduction of the virgin forest of the north temperate zone. New Phytologist 44: 130–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop H. and Hilgen P. 1987. Forest dynamics and regeneration mosaic shifts in unexploited beech (Fagus sylvatica) stands at Fontainebleau (France). Forest Ecol. Manag. 20: 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop H. 1989. Forest Dynamics. Silvistar: A Comprehensive Monitoring System. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpel S. 1995. Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibendgut H. 1959. Über Zweck und Methodik der Struktur und Zuwachsanalyse von Urwäldern. Schweiz Zeitschrift fü r Forstwesen. 110: 110–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemée G. 1978. Structure et Fonctionnement des Ecosystèmes Terrestre. Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansuy D. 1992. Les granites et la couverture pédologique dans le bassin du Rouge Rupt. Leurs participations au contrôle de l’acidification des eaux (Cornimont — Vosges méridionales). PhD thesis, University of Nancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer H and Neumann M. 1981. Struktureller und entwicklungsdynamischer Vergleich der Fichten-Tannen-Buchen Urwälder Rothwald Niederösterreich und Corkova Urwald. Kroatien Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 100: 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta R., Nola P. and Piussi P. 2002. Long-term investigations in strict forest reserve in the eastern Italian Alps: spatio-temporal origin and development in two multi-layered subalpine stands. J. Ecol. 90: 495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini E. 1997. Approche morphologique du développement du hêtre (Fagus sylvatica.). PhD thesis, Université de Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer E. 1991. Die hochmontanen Wälder und subalpinen Gebüsche. Der Feldberg im Schwarzwald. Subalpine Insel im Mittelgebirge. (Landesantstalt für Umweltschutz Baden-Würtemberg), Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer E. 1992. Süddeutsche Pflanzen-Gesellschaften. Teil IV: Wälder und Gebüsche. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office National des Forêts 2000. Evaluation de l’impact des ongulés sur la végétation forestière du Frankenthal-Missheimle. Parc Naturel Régional des Ballons des Vosges, Internal Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooisterhius L., Oldeman R.A.A. and Sharik T.L. 1982. Architectural approach to analysis of North American temperate deciduous forests. Can. J. Forest Res. 12: 835–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman R.A.A. 1974. L’architecture de la forêt guyanaise. Mémoires ORSTOM 73: 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman R.A.A. 1979. Quelques aspects quantifiables de l’arborigenèse et de la sylvigénèse. Ecologica Plantarum 143: 289–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman R.A.A. 1990. Forests: Elements of Silvology. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsini L. and Remy J.C. 1976. Utilisation du chlorure de cobaltihexamine pour la détermination simultanée de la capacitéd’échange et des bases èchangeables des sols. Science du Sol 4: 268–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken G. P. 1996. Natural Woodlands: Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters R. 1992. Ecology of beech forests in the northern hemisphere. Ph.D thesis, University of Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrel S. 2001. Détermination du climat lumineux, à l’aide de photographies hémisphériques et de ses relations avec la répartition de la végétation dans une hêtraie sapinière de la réserve biologique intégrale en forêt domaniale de Guebwiller. DEA. University of Strasbourg, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renaud J.P., Kustner C. and Hauschild R. 2000. La Réserve Biologique Domaniale de Guebwiller (Haut-Rhin). Présentation générale et résultats d’un premier inventaire réaliséselon le protocole européen COST. Office National des Forêts, Internal Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roloff A. 1999. Tree vigor and branching pattern. Journal of Forest Science 45: 206–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler A. 2002. Ecologie des forêts naturelles d’Europe. Biodiversité, sylvigénèse, valeur patrimoniale des forêts primaires. Lavoisier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwoehrer C. and Despert Y. 1999. Réserve naturelle du FM, plan de gestion. Parc Naturel Régional des Ballons des Vosges, Internal Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwoehrer C. 1999. Réserve naturelle du massif du Grand Ventron, plan de gestion. Internal Report PNRBV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seynave I. 1999. Analyse de la structure de deux peuplements forestiers mélangés équiennes: la sapinière-hêtraie et la chênaie-hêtraie dans le nord-est de la France. Ph.D thesis, ENGREF, Nancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sittler B., Tennhardt T. and Shicarts E. 2000. Die Schützgebiete Russlands vor neuen Herausforderungen. Natur und Landschaft 75: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souchier B. 1971. Evolution des sols sur roches cristallines à l’étage montagnard (Vosges). Mémoiré Service Carte géologique. Alsace Lorraine, pp.33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Untereiner A., Advocat A. Stoehr B. and Despert Y. 2002. Carte de la végétation de la Réserve naturelle du Frankenthal Missheimle. Parc Naturel Régional des Ballons des Vosges, Internal Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich E. and Williot B. 1994. Les dépôts atmosphériques en France de 1850 à 1990. ONF, Internal Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallauri D. and Poncet L. 2003. La protection des forêts en France métropolitaine. Livre blanc sur la protection des forêts naturelles en France. Lavoisier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varlet-Granchet C., Gosse G., Chartier M., Sinoquet H., Bonhomme R. and Allirand J.M. 1989. Mise au point: rayonnement solaire absorbéou intercepté par un couvert végétal. Agronomie 9: 419–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester H. 1997. The Trees and the Forest. The role of tree architecture in canopy development; a case study in secondary forests (Araracuara, Columbia) PhD thesis, University of Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • White P.S. 1978. Pattern process and natural disturbance in vegetation. Bot. Rev. 45: 229–299.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LBFE, University of Metz, Campus Bridoux, rue du Général Delestraint, 57070, Metz-Borny, France

    D. Closset-Kopp, A. Schnitzler & D. Aran

Authors
  1. D. Closset-Kopp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Schnitzler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Aran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Closset-Kopp, D., Schnitzler, A., Aran, D. (2006). Dynamics in natural mixed-beech forest of the Upper Vosges. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Forest Diversity and Management. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5208-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation