Abstract
The woodlands of Quinto Real (Quinto Real, Erreguerena and Legua Acotada) are a 3,000 hectare beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest managed by the shelterwood system applied to even-aged (regular) stands. This study analyses how forest management determines the local distribution of the white-backed woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) and black woodpecker (Dryocopus martius) and its relationship with the type, structure and size of the stands used for nesting by both species, as well as their dead wood requirements. The most suitable nesting habitat of both species is the mature forest (stands of regular large final crop trees), but the size of the mature fragments and a minimum quantity of dead wood is also important.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Angelstam P. 1990. Factors determining the composition and persistence of local woodpecker assemblages in taiga forests in Sweden — a case for landscape ecological studies. In: Carlson A. and Aulen G. (eds), Conservation and Management of Wo’odpecker Populations. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife Ecology, Uppsala, pp. 147–191.
Angelstam P. and Mikusinski G. 1994. Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest — a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31: 157–172.
Angelstam P., Butler R., Lazdinis M., Mikusinski G. and Roberge J.M. 2003. Habitat thresholds for focal species at multiple scales and forest biodiversity conservation — dead wood as an example. Annales Zoologici Fennici 40(6): 473–482.
Aulén G. 1988. Ecology and distribution history of the White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos in Sweden. Ph.D. Thesis, Report 14, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Wildlife Ecology, Uppsala.
Aulén G. and Lundberg A. 1991. Sexual dimorphism and patterns of territory use by the Whitebacked Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos. Ornis Scandinavica 22: 60–64.
Avery M. and Leslie R. 1990. Birds and Forestry. T. & A.D. Poyser, London.
Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D. and Hill D.A. 1992. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London.
Blanco J.C. and González J.L. 1992. Libro Rojo de los Vertebrados de España. ICONA, ed. Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid.
Brooks J. 1985. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol IV. Oxford University Press.
Butler R., Algelstam P., Ekelund P. and Schlaepfer R. 2004. Dead wood threshold values for the three-toed woodpecker presence in boreal and subalpine forest. Biological Conservation 119: 305–318.
Butler R. and Schlaepfer R. 2003. Three-toed woodpecker as an alternative to bark beetle control by traps?. In: Pechacek P and d’Oleire-Oltmanns W. (eds), International Woodpeckers Symposium. Berchtesgaden, pp. 13–26.
Carlson A. 2000. The effect of habitat loss on a deciduous forest specialist species: the Whitebacked Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos). Forest Ecology and Management 131: 215–221.
Conner R. 1979. Seasonal changes in woodpecker foraging methods: Strategies for winter survival Pages 95–105. In: Dickson J.G., Conner R.N., Fleet R.R., Kroll J.C. and Jackson J.A. (eds), The role of insectivorous birds in forest ecosystems. Academic Press, NY, pp. 381.
Cramp S. (ed.) 1985. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol. 4. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Cuisin M. 1967. Essai d’une monographie du Pic noire (Dryocopus martius). Oiseau Rev Fr Ornithol. 37:163–192, 37:285–315, 38:20–52, 38:103–126, 38:209–224.
Fernández C., Azkona P. and Lorente L. 1994. Corología y caracterización del hábitat del pico dorsiblanco (Dendrocopos leucotos) en el Pirineo occidental español. Ardeola 41(2): 135–140.SEO.
Fernández C. and Azkona P. 1996. Influence of forest structure on the density and distribution of the White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos and black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius in Quinto Real (Spanish western Pyrenees). Bird Study 43: 305–313. British Trust for Ornithology.
Fleishman E., Blair R.B. and Murphy D.D. 2001. Empirical validation of a method for umbrella species selection. Ecological Applications 11: 1489–1501.
Fleishman E., Jonsson B.G. and Sjagren-Gulve P. 2000. Focal species modeling for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Bulletins 48: 85–99.
Gobierno De Navarra 1990. Ley Foral 13/1990, de 31 de diciembre. Protección Y Desarrollo del Patrimonio Forestal de Navarra. Boletín Oficial de Navarra núm. 6, de 14 de enero de 1991.
Gobierno De Navarra 1992. Decreto Foral 59/1992, de 17 de febrero. Reglamento de Montes en Desarrollo de la Ley Foral 13/1990, de 31 de Diciembre, de Protección y Desarrollo del Patrimonio Forestal de Navarra. Boletín Oficial de Navarra núm. 48, de 20 de abril de 1992.
Gobierno De Navarra 1998. Plan Forestal de Navarra. www.cfnavarra.es.
Gobierno De Navarra 1999. Estrategia Navarra para la Conservación de la Biodiversidad. www.cfnavarra.es.
Hogstad O. 1970. On the ecology of the three-toed woodpecker Picoides tridactylus (L.) outside the breeding season. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 18: 221–227.
Imbeau L. and Desrochers A. 2002. Foraging ecology and use of drumming trees by three-toed woodpeckers. Journal of Wildlife Management 66: 222–231.
Martinez-Vidal R. 1999. Hábitat de crá del pito negro (Dryocopus martius) en las Sierras de Cadíy Moixeró: caracterización, tipología y pérdidas de árboles nido. Gestión y Conservación de la biodiversidad en ecosistemas forestales. C.T.F.C, Solsona.
Mcclelland B. and Mcclelland P. 1999. Pileated woodpecker nest and roost trees in Montana: links with old-growth and forest “health”. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27(3): 846–857
Mikusinski G. and Angelstam P. 1997. European woodpeckers and anthropogenic habitat change: a review. Vogelwelt 118: 277–283.
Murphy E.C. and Lehnhausen W.A. 1998. Density and foraging ecology of woodpeckers following a stand-replacement fire. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 1359–1372.
Nilsson S.G. 1992. Population trends and fluctuations in Swedish woodpeckers. Ornis Svecica 2: 13–21.
Purroy F.J. 1972. El pico dorsiblanco Dendrocopos leucotos del Pirineo. Ardeola 20: 145–158.
Purroy F.J., Alvarez A. and Pettersson B. 1990. Bosque y fauna de vertebrados terrestres en España. Ecología 1: 349–363.
Roberge J.M. and Angelstam P. 2004. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology 18(1): 1–10.
Schwendtner O. and Larrañaga A. (coords.) 2001. Sexta Revisión de la Ordenación del grupo de Montes de Quinto Real. BASOA/Gobierno de Navarra.
Simberloff D. 1999. The role of science in the preservation of forest biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management 115: 101–111.
Svenssons S.E. 1979. Census Efficiency and number of visits to a study plot when estimating bird densities by the territory mapping method. Journal of Applied Ecology 16: 61–68.
Tellería J.L. 1986. Manual para el Censo de los Vertebrados Terrestres. Ed. Raíces, Madrid.
Tellería J.L. 1992. Gestión forestal y conservación de las aves en España peninsular. Ardeola 39: 99–114.
Tucker G.M. and Heath M.F. (eds) 1994. Birds in Europe — their conservation status. BirdLife International, Conservation Series No. 3, Cambridge.
Voous K.H. 1947. On the history of the distribution of the genus Dendrocopos. Limosa 20: 1–142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garmendia, A., Cárcamo, S., Schwendtner, O. (2006). Forest management considerations for conservation of Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius and White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos populations in Quinto Real (Spanish Western Pyrenees). In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Forest Diversity and Management. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5208-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5208-8_18
Received:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5207-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5208-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)