Skip to main content

Forest management considerations for conservation of Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius and White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos populations in Quinto Real (Spanish Western Pyrenees)

  • Chapter
Forest Diversity and Management

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 2))

Abstract

The woodlands of Quinto Real (Quinto Real, Erreguerena and Legua Acotada) are a 3,000 hectare beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest managed by the shelterwood system applied to even-aged (regular) stands. This study analyses how forest management determines the local distribution of the white-backed woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) and black woodpecker (Dryocopus martius) and its relationship with the type, structure and size of the stands used for nesting by both species, as well as their dead wood requirements. The most suitable nesting habitat of both species is the mature forest (stands of regular large final crop trees), but the size of the mature fragments and a minimum quantity of dead wood is also important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Angelstam P. 1990. Factors determining the composition and persistence of local woodpecker assemblages in taiga forests in Sweden — a case for landscape ecological studies. In: Carlson A. and Aulen G. (eds), Conservation and Management of Wo’odpecker Populations. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife Ecology, Uppsala, pp. 147–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P. and Mikusinski G. 1994. Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest — a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31: 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P., Butler R., Lazdinis M., Mikusinski G. and Roberge J.M. 2003. Habitat thresholds for focal species at multiple scales and forest biodiversity conservation — dead wood as an example. Annales Zoologici Fennici 40(6): 473–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulén G. 1988. Ecology and distribution history of the White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos in Sweden. Ph.D. Thesis, Report 14, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Wildlife Ecology, Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulén G. and Lundberg A. 1991. Sexual dimorphism and patterns of territory use by the Whitebacked Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos. Ornis Scandinavica 22: 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery M. and Leslie R. 1990. Birds and Forestry. T. & A.D. Poyser, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D. and Hill D.A. 1992. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco J.C. and González J.L. 1992. Libro Rojo de los Vertebrados de España. ICONA, ed. Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks J. 1985. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol IV. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler R., Algelstam P., Ekelund P. and Schlaepfer R. 2004. Dead wood threshold values for the three-toed woodpecker presence in boreal and subalpine forest. Biological Conservation 119: 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler R. and Schlaepfer R. 2003. Three-toed woodpecker as an alternative to bark beetle control by traps?. In: Pechacek P and d’Oleire-Oltmanns W. (eds), International Woodpeckers Symposium. Berchtesgaden, pp. 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson A. 2000. The effect of habitat loss on a deciduous forest specialist species: the Whitebacked Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos). Forest Ecology and Management 131: 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner R. 1979. Seasonal changes in woodpecker foraging methods: Strategies for winter survival Pages 95–105. In: Dickson J.G., Conner R.N., Fleet R.R., Kroll J.C. and Jackson J.A. (eds), The role of insectivorous birds in forest ecosystems. Academic Press, NY, pp. 381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S. (ed.) 1985. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Vol. 4. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuisin M. 1967. Essai d’une monographie du Pic noire (Dryocopus martius). Oiseau Rev Fr Ornithol. 37:163–192, 37:285–315, 38:20–52, 38:103–126, 38:209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández C., Azkona P. and Lorente L. 1994. Corología y caracterización del hábitat del pico dorsiblanco (Dendrocopos leucotos) en el Pirineo occidental español. Ardeola 41(2): 135–140.SEO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández C. and Azkona P. 1996. Influence of forest structure on the density and distribution of the White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos and black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius in Quinto Real (Spanish western Pyrenees). Bird Study 43: 305–313. British Trust for Ornithology.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman E., Blair R.B. and Murphy D.D. 2001. Empirical validation of a method for umbrella species selection. Ecological Applications 11: 1489–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman E., Jonsson B.G. and Sjagren-Gulve P. 2000. Focal species modeling for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Bulletins 48: 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno De Navarra 1990. Ley Foral 13/1990, de 31 de diciembre. Protección Y Desarrollo del Patrimonio Forestal de Navarra. Boletín Oficial de Navarra núm. 6, de 14 de enero de 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno De Navarra 1992. Decreto Foral 59/1992, de 17 de febrero. Reglamento de Montes en Desarrollo de la Ley Foral 13/1990, de 31 de Diciembre, de Protección y Desarrollo del Patrimonio Forestal de Navarra. Boletín Oficial de Navarra núm. 48, de 20 de abril de 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno De Navarra 1998. Plan Forestal de Navarra. www.cfnavarra.es.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno De Navarra 1999. Estrategia Navarra para la Conservación de la Biodiversidad. www.cfnavarra.es.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O. 1970. On the ecology of the three-toed woodpecker Picoides tridactylus (L.) outside the breeding season. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 18: 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbeau L. and Desrochers A. 2002. Foraging ecology and use of drumming trees by three-toed woodpeckers. Journal of Wildlife Management 66: 222–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vidal R. 1999. Hábitat de crá del pito negro (Dryocopus martius) en las Sierras de Cadíy Moixeró: caracterización, tipología y pérdidas de árboles nido. Gestión y Conservación de la biodiversidad en ecosistemas forestales. C.T.F.C, Solsona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcclelland B. and Mcclelland P. 1999. Pileated woodpecker nest and roost trees in Montana: links with old-growth and forest “health”. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27(3): 846–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikusinski G. and Angelstam P. 1997. European woodpeckers and anthropogenic habitat change: a review. Vogelwelt 118: 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy E.C. and Lehnhausen W.A. 1998. Density and foraging ecology of woodpeckers following a stand-replacement fire. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 1359–1372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson S.G. 1992. Population trends and fluctuations in Swedish woodpeckers. Ornis Svecica 2: 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purroy F.J. 1972. El pico dorsiblanco Dendrocopos leucotos del Pirineo. Ardeola 20: 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purroy F.J., Alvarez A. and Pettersson B. 1990. Bosque y fauna de vertebrados terrestres en España. Ecología 1: 349–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberge J.M. and Angelstam P. 2004. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology 18(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwendtner O. and Larrañaga A. (coords.) 2001. Sexta Revisión de la Ordenación del grupo de Montes de Quinto Real. BASOA/Gobierno de Navarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D. 1999. The role of science in the preservation of forest biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management 115: 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svenssons S.E. 1979. Census Efficiency and number of visits to a study plot when estimating bird densities by the territory mapping method. Journal of Applied Ecology 16: 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellería J.L. 1986. Manual para el Censo de los Vertebrados Terrestres. Ed. Raíces, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellería J.L. 1992. Gestión forestal y conservación de las aves en España peninsular. Ardeola 39: 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker G.M. and Heath M.F. (eds) 1994. Birds in Europe — their conservation status. BirdLife International, Conservation Series No. 3, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voous K.H. 1947. On the history of the distribution of the genus Dendrocopos. Limosa 20: 1–142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garmendia, A., Cárcamo, S., Schwendtner, O. (2006). Forest management considerations for conservation of Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius and White-backed Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos populations in Quinto Real (Spanish Western Pyrenees). In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Forest Diversity and Management. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5208-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics