Skip to main content

How ant nests increase soil biota richness and abundance: a field experiment

  • Chapter
Book cover Arthropod Diversity and Conservation

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 1))

Abstract

Although many studies have shown that ant nests tend to increase soil nutrient concentrations, only a few have examined ant impact on soil biota. To date, no one has examined the mechanism behind this complex ‘ant effect.’ In this study, we employed a 2 × 2 complete factorial design (water × food) in the field to mimic the effects of harvester ant nests (Messor andrei) on soil. We hypothesized that, in the absence of ants, addition of moisture and food (seeds and insects) would interact to produce conditions found in ant nests. Our results indicated that the addition of food to the soil (regardless of water addition) best mimicked the conditions found inside M. andrei nests. Both food-treated and ant-nest soils supported higher numbers of bacteria, nematodes, miscellaneous eukaryotes, and microarthropods compared to the other soil treatments. Microbial richness was also highest in ant and food-treated samples. Moreover, the ant effect in our experiment occurred in just two months. Because ants are a widespread, abundant group with many long-lived species, they could substantially influence soil properties and belowground food webs and may have important restoration/conservation implications for terrestrial communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beare M., Parmelee R., Hendrix P. and Cheng W. 1992. Microbial and faunal interactions and effects on litter nitrogen and decomposition in agroecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 569–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boag B. and Yeates G. 1998. Soil nematode biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems. Biodiv. Conserv. 7: 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongers T. and Bongers M. 1998. Functional diversity of nematodes. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10: 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossio D. and Scow K. 1995. Impact of carbon and flooding on metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils. Appl. Envir. Microbiol. 61: 4043–4050.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bossio D. and Scow K. 1998. Impact of carbon and flooding on PFLA profiles and substrate utilization patterns of soil microbial communities. Microbial Ecol. 35: 265–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton A.M., Jaffee B.A. and Scow K.M. 2003. Effects of a common harvester ant (Messor andrei) on richness and abundance of soil biota. Appl. Soil Ecol. 23: 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady N. and Weil R. 1996. The nature and properties of soils, 11th edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley G. 1972. Transplanting Formica obscuripes and Dolichoderus taschenbergi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) colonies in jack pine stands of southeastern Canada. Can. Entomol. 104: 245–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown M. 1999. Nest relocation and encounters between colonies of the seed-harvesting ant Messor andrei. Insectes Sociaux 46: 66–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell C. and Biederbeck V. 1976. Soil bacterial changes as affected by growing season weather conditions: a field and laboratory study. Can. J. Soil Sci. 56: 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole B. 1994. Nest architecture in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis (Cresson). Insectes Sociaux 41: 401–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean W., Milton S. and Klotz S. 1997. The role of ant-mounds in maintaining small-scale patchiness in dry grasslands in Central Germany. Biodiv. Conserv. 6: 1292–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran J. 1987. Microbial biomass and mineralizable nitrogen distributions in no-tillage and plowed soils. Biol. Fert. Soils 5: 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folgarait P. 1998. Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review. Biodiv. Conserv. 7: 1221–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friese C. and Allen M. 1993. The interaction of harvester ants and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a patchy semi-arid environment: the effects of mound structure on fungal dispersion and establishment. Functional Ecol. 7: 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E. 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee B., Ferris H. and Scow K. 1998. Nematode-trapping fungi in organic and conventional cropping systems. Phytopathology 88: 344–349.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laakso J. and Setälä H. 1997. Nest mounds of red wood ants (Formica aquilonia): hot spots for litter dwelling earthworms. Oecologia 111: 565–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laakso J. and Setälä H. 1998. Composition and trophic structure of detrital food webs in ant nest mounds of Formica aquilonia and in the surrounding forest soil. Oikos 81: 266–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay W. 1981. A comparison of the nest phenologies of three species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 88: 25–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikola J., Yeates G., Barker G., Wardle D. and Bonner K. 2001. Effects of defoliation intensity on soil food-web properties in an experimental grassland. Oikos 92: 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmelee R., Bohlen P. and Edwards C. 1995. Analysis of nematode trophic structure in agro-systems: functional groups versus high resolution taxonomy. In: Collins H.P., Robertson G.P. and Klug M.J. (eds), The Significance and Regulation of Soil Biodiversity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavon M. 1950. Sugli inizi d’un esperimento practico di lotta biologica con Formica rufa L. contro la processionaria del pino (ThaumetoPoea PityocamPa Sch.). Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. 89: 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavon M. 1960. Les transplantations de Formica lugubris sur les Apennins de la province de Pavie. Italy Ministry of Agriculture, Collana Verde 7: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preisser E.L. 2003. Field evidence for a rapidly cascading underground food web. Ecology 84: 869–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R. and Rohlf F. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong D., Maron J. and Connors P. 1996. Top down from underground? The under-appreciated influence of subterranean food webs on above-ground ecology. In: Polis G.A. and Winemiller K.O. (eds), Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 170–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick B. and Fidell L. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd edn. Harper Collins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California, Natural Reserve System (UC NRS). 2000. Natural history of the McLaughlin Reserve. UC Davis printing services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner D., Brown M. and Gordon D. 1997. Harvester ant nests, soil biota and soil chemistry. Oecologia 112: 232–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White D. and Findlay R. 1988. Biochemical markers for measurement of predation effects on the biomass, community structure, nutritional status, and metabolic activity of microbial biofilms. Hydrobiologia 159: 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford W. 1996. The importance of the biodiversity of soil biota in arid ecosystems. Biodiv. Conserv. 5: 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford W. and DiMarco R. 1995. Variability in soils and vegetation associated with harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex rugosus) nests on a Chihuahuan Desert watershed. Biol. Fert. Soils 20: 169–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates G., Bongers T., deGoede R. and Georgieva S. 1993. Feeding habits in nematode families and genera — an outline for soil ecologists. J. Nematol. 25: 315–331.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zak D.R., Holmes W.E., White D.C., Peacock A.D. and Tilman D. 2003. Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links? Ecology 84: 2042–2050.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boulton, A.M., Amberman, K.D. (2006). How ant nests increase soil biota richness and abundance: a field experiment. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Arthropod Diversity and Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5204-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics