Abstract
Although many studies have shown that ant nests tend to increase soil nutrient concentrations, only a few have examined ant impact on soil biota. To date, no one has examined the mechanism behind this complex ‘ant effect.’ In this study, we employed a 2 × 2 complete factorial design (water × food) in the field to mimic the effects of harvester ant nests (Messor andrei) on soil. We hypothesized that, in the absence of ants, addition of moisture and food (seeds and insects) would interact to produce conditions found in ant nests. Our results indicated that the addition of food to the soil (regardless of water addition) best mimicked the conditions found inside M. andrei nests. Both food-treated and ant-nest soils supported higher numbers of bacteria, nematodes, miscellaneous eukaryotes, and microarthropods compared to the other soil treatments. Microbial richness was also highest in ant and food-treated samples. Moreover, the ant effect in our experiment occurred in just two months. Because ants are a widespread, abundant group with many long-lived species, they could substantially influence soil properties and belowground food webs and may have important restoration/conservation implications for terrestrial communities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beare M., Parmelee R., Hendrix P. and Cheng W. 1992. Microbial and faunal interactions and effects on litter nitrogen and decomposition in agroecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 569–591.
Boag B. and Yeates G. 1998. Soil nematode biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems. Biodiv. Conserv. 7: 617–630.
Bongers T. and Bongers M. 1998. Functional diversity of nematodes. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10: 239–251.
Bossio D. and Scow K. 1995. Impact of carbon and flooding on metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils. Appl. Envir. Microbiol. 61: 4043–4050.
Bossio D. and Scow K. 1998. Impact of carbon and flooding on PFLA profiles and substrate utilization patterns of soil microbial communities. Microbial Ecol. 35: 265–278.
Boulton A.M., Jaffee B.A. and Scow K.M. 2003. Effects of a common harvester ant (Messor andrei) on richness and abundance of soil biota. Appl. Soil Ecol. 23: 257–265.
Brady N. and Weil R. 1996. The nature and properties of soils, 11th edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York.
Bradley G. 1972. Transplanting Formica obscuripes and Dolichoderus taschenbergi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) colonies in jack pine stands of southeastern Canada. Can. Entomol. 104: 245–249.
Brown M. 1999. Nest relocation and encounters between colonies of the seed-harvesting ant Messor andrei. Insectes Sociaux 46: 66–70.
Campbell C. and Biederbeck V. 1976. Soil bacterial changes as affected by growing season weather conditions: a field and laboratory study. Can. J. Soil Sci. 56: 293–310.
Cole B. 1994. Nest architecture in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis (Cresson). Insectes Sociaux 41: 401–410.
Dean W., Milton S. and Klotz S. 1997. The role of ant-mounds in maintaining small-scale patchiness in dry grasslands in Central Germany. Biodiv. Conserv. 6: 1292–1307.
Doran J. 1987. Microbial biomass and mineralizable nitrogen distributions in no-tillage and plowed soils. Biol. Fert. Soils 5: 68–75.
Folgarait P. 1998. Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review. Biodiv. Conserv. 7: 1221–1244.
Friese C. and Allen M. 1993. The interaction of harvester ants and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a patchy semi-arid environment: the effects of mound structure on fungal dispersion and establishment. Functional Ecol. 7: 13–20.
Hölldobler B. and Wilson E. 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.
Jaffee B., Ferris H. and Scow K. 1998. Nematode-trapping fungi in organic and conventional cropping systems. Phytopathology 88: 344–349.
Laakso J. and Setälä H. 1997. Nest mounds of red wood ants (Formica aquilonia): hot spots for litter dwelling earthworms. Oecologia 111: 565–569.
Laakso J. and Setälä H. 1998. Composition and trophic structure of detrital food webs in ant nest mounds of Formica aquilonia and in the surrounding forest soil. Oikos 81: 266–278.
MacKay W. 1981. A comparison of the nest phenologies of three species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 88: 25–74.
Mikola J., Yeates G., Barker G., Wardle D. and Bonner K. 2001. Effects of defoliation intensity on soil food-web properties in an experimental grassland. Oikos 92: 333–343.
Parmelee R., Bohlen P. and Edwards C. 1995. Analysis of nematode trophic structure in agro-systems: functional groups versus high resolution taxonomy. In: Collins H.P., Robertson G.P. and Klug M.J. (eds), The Significance and Regulation of Soil Biodiversity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 203–207.
Pavon M. 1950. Sugli inizi d’un esperimento practico di lotta biologica con Formica rufa L. contro la processionaria del pino (ThaumetoPoea PityocamPa Sch.). Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. 89: 195–201.
Pavon M. 1960. Les transplantations de Formica lugubris sur les Apennins de la province de Pavie. Italy Ministry of Agriculture, Collana Verde 7: 161–169.
Preisser E.L. 2003. Field evidence for a rapidly cascading underground food web. Ecology 84: 869–874.
Sokal R. and Rohlf F. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Strong D., Maron J. and Connors P. 1996. Top down from underground? The under-appreciated influence of subterranean food webs on above-ground ecology. In: Polis G.A. and Winemiller K.O. (eds), Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 170–175.
Tabachnick B. and Fidell L. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd edn. Harper Collins College Publishers.
University of California, Natural Reserve System (UC NRS). 2000. Natural history of the McLaughlin Reserve. UC Davis printing services.
Wagner D., Brown M. and Gordon D. 1997. Harvester ant nests, soil biota and soil chemistry. Oecologia 112: 232–236.
White D. and Findlay R. 1988. Biochemical markers for measurement of predation effects on the biomass, community structure, nutritional status, and metabolic activity of microbial biofilms. Hydrobiologia 159: 119–132.
Whitford W. 1996. The importance of the biodiversity of soil biota in arid ecosystems. Biodiv. Conserv. 5: 185–195.
Whitford W. and DiMarco R. 1995. Variability in soils and vegetation associated with harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex rugosus) nests on a Chihuahuan Desert watershed. Biol. Fert. Soils 20: 169–173.
Yeates G., Bongers T., deGoede R. and Georgieva S. 1993. Feeding habits in nematode families and genera — an outline for soil ecologists. J. Nematol. 25: 315–331.
Zak D.R., Holmes W.E., White D.C., Peacock A.D. and Tilman D. 2003. Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links? Ecology 84: 2042–2050.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boulton, A.M., Amberman, K.D. (2006). How ant nests increase soil biota richness and abundance: a field experiment. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Arthropod Diversity and Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5204-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5204-0_5
Received:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5203-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5204-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)