Skip to main content

IMPACT OF COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS ON DESIGN BEHAVIOUR

  • Conference paper
Design Computing and Cognition ’06

Abstract

A collaborative design environment makes assumptions about how the designers communicate and represent their design ideas. These assumptions, including the availability of sketching, 3D modelling, and walking around virtual worlds with avatars, effectively make some actions easier and others more difficult. An analysis of design behaviour in different virtual environments can highlight the impact and benefits of the different tools/environments and their assumptions. This paper reports on a study of three pairs of designers collaborating on design tasks of similar complexity using a different design environment for each task: face to face sketching, remote sketching, and 3D virtual world. Comparing the behaviour patterns and design actions we conclude that the characteristics of design process are quite different in sketching and 3D world environments. While sketching, the architects more frequently moved between the problem and solution spaces, dealing with analysis and synthesis of ideas. The same architects focused on synthesis of the objects, visually analysing the representation, and managing the tasks to model the design when they were in the 3D virtual world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akin, Ö: 1986, Psychology of Architectural Design, Pion, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akin, Ö and Lin CC: 1995, Design protocol data and novel design decision, Design Studies 16: 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candy, L, Bilda, Z, Maher, ML and Gero, JS: 2004, Evaluating software support for video data capture and analysis in collaborative design studies, Proceedings of QualIT04 Conference, Brisbane, Australia (CD-Rom, no page numbers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N, Christiaans H and Dorst K (eds): 1996, Analysing Design Activity, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwarakanath, S, and Blessing, L: 1996, The design process ingredients: A comparison between group and individual work, in N Cross, H Christiaans, and K Doorst (eds) Analysing Design Activity, John Wiley, Chicester,West Sussex, pp. 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke RA, Ward, TB and Smith, SM: 1992, Creative Cognition: Theory, Research and Application, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, JS and McNeill, TM: 1998, An approach to the analysis of design protocols, Design Studies 19: 21–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvan, T: 2000, Collaborative design:What is it?, Automation in Construction 9(4): 409–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B: 1990, How Designers Think, London, Boston, Butterworth Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, ML, Bilda, Z and Marchant, D: 2005a, Comparing collaborative design behaviour in remote sketching and 3D virtual worlds, Proceedings of International Workshop on Human Behaviour in Designing, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, ML, Bilda, Z, Gül, LF and Marchant, D: 2005b, Studying design collaboration in virtual worlds, in JS Gero and N Bonnardel (eds) Studying Designers′05, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, pp. 291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munkvold, BE: 2003, Implementing Collaboration Technologies in Industry: Case Examples and Lessons Learned, Springer-Verlag, London Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stempfle, J and Badke-Schaub P: 2002, Thinking in design teams- An analysis of team communication, Design Studies 23: 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, M and Tversky, B: 1997, What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis, Design Studies 18(4): 385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, M, Purcell, T and Gero, JS: 1998, Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions, Design Studies 19(4): 455–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

MAHER, M.L., BILDA, Z., GÜL, L.F. (2006). IMPACT OF COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS ON DESIGN BEHAVIOUR. In: GERO, J.S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition ’06. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5130-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5131-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics