Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Space and Place – Two Aspects of the Human-landscape Relationship

  • Chapter
Book cover A Changing World

Part of the book series: Landscape Series ((LAEC,volume 8))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abello R.P. and Bernaldez F.G. 1986. Landscape preference and personality. Landscape and Urban Planning 13: 19-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman I. and Low S. 1992. Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton J. 1975 (2nd revised edition, 1995). The experience of landscape. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balling J.D. and Falk J.H. 1982. Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior 14, 1: 5-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker R.G. 1968. Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernaldez F.G., Gallardo D. and Abello R.P. 1987. Children’s landscape preferences: From rejection to attraction. Journal of Environmental Psychology 7, 2: 169-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa S.C. 1991. The aesthetics of landscape. London and New York: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell G.M. 1986. Coping with threatened identity. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchecker M., Hunziker M. and Kienast F. 2003. Participatory landscape development - over-coming social barriers to public involvement. Landscape and Urban Planning 64: 29-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchecker M. 2005. Public place as a resource of social interaction. In: Turner P. and Davenport E. (eds.). Space, spatiality and technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clamp P.P. and Powell M. 1982. Prospect-refuge theory under test. Landscape Research 7: 7-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coeterier J.F. 1996. Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 34: 27-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M.C. 1995. House as a mirror of self: Exploring the deeper meaning of home. Berkeley, CA: Conari Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon J. and Durrheim K. 2000. Displacing place identity: A discursive approach to locating self and other. British Journal of Social Psychology 39: 27-44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhauer B.W., Krannich R.S. and Blahna D.J. 2000. Attachments to special places on public lands: An analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections. Society and Natural Resources 13: 421-441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk I. and Kilpatrick S. 2000. What is social capital? A study of interaction in a rural community. European Society for Rural Sociology 40, 1: 87-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox S. 1985. The American conservation movement: John Muir and his legacy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer U. and Kaiser F. 1994. Multilokales Wohnen. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer U. 1990. Bridging the ecological gap: Behaviour settings as interfaces. Environment and Behaviour 22, 4: 518-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimblett H.R. 1990. Environmental cognition: The prediction of preference in rural Indiana. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 7: 222-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graumann C.F. 1983. On multiple Identities. International Social Science Journal 35: 309-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider T. and Garkovich L. 1994. Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environ-ment. Rural Sociology 59, 1: 1-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerhäll C.M. 2000. Clustering predictors of landscape preference in the traditional Swedish cultural landscape: prospect-refuge, mystery, age and management. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20, 1: 83-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T., Kaiser F.G. and Bowler P.A. 2001. Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior 33: 590-607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay R. 1998. Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18: 5-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog T.R. and Kropscott L.S. 2004. Legibility, mystery, and visual access as predictors of prefer-ence and perceived danger in forest settings without pathways. Environment and Behavior 36, 5: 659-677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog T.R. and Leverich O.L. 2003. Searching for legibility. Environment and Behavior, 35, 4: 459-477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog T.R. 1989. A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 9: 27-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull R.B. and Stewart W.P. 1995. The landscape encountered and experienced while hiking. Environment and Behavior 27: 404-426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummon D.M. 1992. Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place. In: Altman I. and Low S.M. (eds.). Human behavior and environments: Advances in theory and research. Volume 12: 253-278. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunziker M., Hoffmann C. and Wild S. 2001. Die Akzeptanz von Raubtieren, Gründe und Hintergründe - Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Umfrage in der Schweiz. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 76, 1-2: 301-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen B.S. and Stedman R.C. 2001. Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 233-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R. and Kaplan S. 1989. The experience of nature. A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. 340 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature - towards an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Quality 15: 169-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopp B. and Mealey L. 1998. Experimental mood manipulation does not induce change in preference for natural landscapes. Human Nature 9, 4: 391-399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela K.M. 1989. Place-identity as a product of environmental self-regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 9: 241-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela K.M. 1992. Adoloescents’ Favourite Places and environmental self-regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 12: 249-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela K.M., Hartig, T., Kaiser F.G. and Fuhrer U. 2001. Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environment and Behavior 33: 572-589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela K.M., Kyttä M. and Hartig T. 2002. Restorative experience, self-regulation, and children’s place preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22: 387-398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela K. and Hartig T. 1996. Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16: 221-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger R. 1987. Wie räumlich ist die Heimat. Geographische Zeitschrift 75, 3: 160-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C. and Hummon D.M. 1993. A place to call home. The Sociological Quarterly 34, 1: 111-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low S.M. and Altman I. 1992. Place attachment:A conceptual inquiry. In: Altman I. and Low S.M. (eds.). Place attachment. pp. 1-12. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luz F. 1993. Zur Akzeptanz landschaftsplanerischer Projekte. Europäische Hochschulschriften. Kiel: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons E. 1983. Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environment and Behavior 15, 4: 487-511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzo L.C. 2003. Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 47-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mealey L. and Theis P. 1995.The relationship between mood and preferences among natural land-scapes - an evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology 16: 247-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasar J.L. 1988. Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. 521 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer J.I. (ed.) 1997. Placing nature - culture and landscape ecology. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg R. 1989. The great good place. New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians G.H. 1980. Habitat selection: General theory and applications to human behavior. In: Lockard J.S. (ed.). The evolution of human social behavior. pp. 49-66. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians G.H. 1986. An ecological evolutionary approach to landscape aesthetics. In: Penning-Rowsell E.C. and Lowenthal D. (eds.). Landscape meanings and values. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt M.B. 1984. Identity: skin, blood, heart. In: Bulkin E., Pratt M.B. and Smith B. (eds.). Yours in Struggle: Three Feminist Perspectives on Anti-semitism and Racism, pp. 27-81, New York: Long Haul Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty G.H., Chipuer H.M. and Bramston P. 2003. Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of place and place dependence in relation to place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 273-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proshansky H., Fabian A.K. and Kaminoff R. 1983. Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3: 57-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relph E. 1976. Place and placelessness. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röllin P. and Preibisch M. 1993. Vertrautes wird fremd Fremdes vertraut. Kulturelle Vielfalt und nationale Identität, Nationales Forschungsprogramm 21. Basel: Helbing and Lichtenhahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk A. 2000. Relevante Faktoren der Akzeptanz von Natur- und Landschaftsschutzmass-nahmen? Ergebnisse qualitativer Fallstudien. Publikation der Ostschweizerischen Geographi-schen Gesellschaft Neue Folge, Heft 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder H. 1992. The spiritual aspect of nature: A perspective from depth psychology. In: Stoep V. ( ed.). Proceedings of the 1991 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, pp. 25-30. Seel M. 1991. Eine Ästhetik der Natur. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. 388 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell J.L. and Zube E.H. 1986. Perception of and response to environmental change. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 3: 33-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard P. 1969. English reaction to the New Zealand landscape before 1850. Pacific Viewpoint Monograph 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel G. 1993. Das Individuum und die Freiheit. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B. 1989. European vision and the South Pacific. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speller G., Lyons E. and Twigger-Ross C. 2002. A community in transition: The relationship between spatial change and identity processes. Social Psychological Review 4, 2: 39-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps A.E. 2004. Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 1-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankey G.H., Cole D.N., Lucas R.C., Petersen M.E. and Frissell S.S. 1985. The Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) system for wilderness planning. Gen.Tech. Report INT-176, USDA Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols D. and Shumaker S.A. 1981. People in places: A transactional view of settings. In: Harvey J.H. (ed.). Cognition, social behavior, and the environment, pp. 441-488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll S. 1999. Akzeptanzprobleme bei der Ausweisung von Grossschutzgebieten. Diss. Univ. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strumse E. 1994a. Environmental attributes and the prediction of visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14: 293-303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strumse E. 1994b. Perceptual dimensions in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14: 281-292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strumse E. 1996. Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16, 1: 17-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syme G.J., Beven C. and Sumner N. R. 1993. Motivation for reported involvement in local wetland preservation. Environment and Behavior 25, 5: 586-606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan Y.F. 1977. Space and place. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigger-Ross C.L. and Uzzell D.L. 1996. Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16: 205-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R.S. 1979. Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape Research 4: 17-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R.S. 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman I. and Wohlwill J.F. (eds.). Behavior and the natural environment. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R.S., Simons R., Losito B.D., Fiorito E., Miles M.A. and Zelson M. 1991. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11: 201-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R.S. 1993. Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In: Kellert S. and Wilson E.O. (eds.). The biophilia hypothesis. pp. 73-137. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg A.E., Koole S.L. and Van der Wulp N.Y. 2003. Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 135-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg A.E., Vlek C.A. and Coeterier J.F. 1998. Group differences in the aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans: A multilevel approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18: 141-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volker K. 1997. Local commitment for sustainable rural landscape development. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 63: 107-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waitt G. 2000. Consuming heritage: Perceived historical authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research 27,4: 835-862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weichhart P. 1990. Raumbezogene Identität. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams D.R., Patterson M.E. and Roggenbuck J.W. 1992. Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences 14, 1: 29-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock D.M. 1982. A functionalist approach to environmental preference. Ann Arbor: Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock M. 1998. Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society 27: 151-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zube E.H., Sell J.L. and Taylor J.G. 1982. Landscape perception - research, application and theory. Landscape Planning 9: 1-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Marcel Hunziker

  2. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Matthias Buchecker

  3. Uppsala University, Institute for Housing and Urban Research, S-80129, Gävle, Sweden

    Terry Hartig

Authors
  1. Marcel Hunziker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Buchecker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Terry Hartig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Felix Kienast

  2. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Otto Wildi

  3. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Sucharita Ghosh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hunziker, M., Buchecker, M., Hartig, T. (2007). Space and Place – Two Aspects of the Human-landscape Relationship. In: Kienast, F., Wildi, O., Ghosh, S. (eds) A Changing World. Landscape Series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4436-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation