Abstract
Jeffrey Spike argues that psychiatrists are often unnecessarily asked to assess the capacity of medical and surgical patients to make decisions about their health care. He maintains that the task properly belongs to the patients’ attending physicians (or, at last resort, to ethicists) who, because they have more opportunity to know the patient and are less burdened by assessment tools, are better equipped to judge such a situated, interactive capacity. To illustrate his point, he presents the cases of two relatively frail and “noncompliant” women who are threatened with consignment to nursing homes.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arras, J. (1997) Nice story, but so what? Narrative and justification in ethics, in H. Lindemann Nelson, ed., Stories and Their Limits, Routledge, New York, pp. 65–88.
Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F. ( 1979; 1983;1989;1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics,1–4th eds., Oxford University Press, New York.
Booth, W.C. (1988) The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction, University of California, Berkeley.
Burrell, D. and Hauerwas, S. (1989) From system to story: An alternative pattern for rationality, in S. Hauerwas and L.G. Jones, eds., Why Narrative?: Readings in Narrative Theology, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI.
Cavell, S. (1969) The avoidance of love, Must We Mean What We Say?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Chambers, T. (1999) The Fiction of Bioethics, Routledge, New York.
Charon, R. (1994) Narrative contributions to medical ethics: Recognition, formulation, interpretation, and validation in the practice of ethicist, in E.R. Dubose, R. Hamel, and L.J. O’Connell, eds., A Matter of Principles? Ferment in U.S. Bioethics, Trinity Press International, Valley Forge, PA, pp. 260–83.
Churchill, L.W. and Churchill, S.W. (1982) Storytelling in medical arenas: The Art of self-determination, Literature and Medicine 1, 73–9.
Clouser, D.K. and Gert, B. (1990) A critique of principles, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10, 219–36.
Dresser, R. (1995) Ronald Dworkin on dementia: Elegant theory, questionable policy, Hastings Center Report 25, 6.
Dworkin, R. (1986) Autonomy and the demented self, Milbank Quarterly 64, 4–16.
Dworkin, R. (1994) Life’s Dominion, Vintage, New York.
Geertz, C. (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, Basic Books, New York.
Kuczewski, M. (1997) Bioethics consensus on method, in H.Lindemann Nelson, ed., Stories and Their Limits, Routledge, New York, pp. 134–49.
Lindemann Nelson, H. (1995) Resistance and insubordination, Hypatia 10, 23–40.
Lindemann Nelson, H. (1997) Stories and Their Limits, Routledge, New York.
MacIntyre, A. (1983) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame, IN.
Murdoch, I. (1971) The Sovereignty of Good, Schoken, New York.
Murray, T.H. (1997) What do we mean by “narrative ethics?,” in H. Lindemann Nelson, ed., Stories and Their Limits, Routledge, New York, pp. 3–17.
Nussbaum, M.C. (1986) The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nussbaum, M.C. (1990) Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, Oxford University Press, New York.
Tomlinson, T. (1997) Perplexed about narrative ethics, in H. Lindemann Nelson, ed., Stories and Their Limits, Routledge, New York, pp. 123–33.
Williams, B. (1981) Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montgomery, K. (2004). How Not to Philosiphize with a Hammer. In: Thomasma, D.C., Weisstub, D.N. (eds) The Variables of Moral Capacity. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2552-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2552-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6677-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2552-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive