Abstract
According to Otto Neurath, the practice of science consists in a large undertaking of setting up and maintaining systems of statements: In unified science we try ... to create a consistent system of protocol statements and nonprotocol statements (including laws). When a new statement is presented to us we compare it with the system at our disposal and check whether the new statement is in contradiction with the system or not. If the new statement is in contradiction with the system, we can discard this statement as unusable (‘false’), for example, the statement: ‘In Africa lions sing only in major chords’ ; however, one can also ‘accept’ the statement and change the system accordingly so that it remains consistent if this statement is added. The statement may then be called ‘true’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchourrón, Carlos, Peter Gärdenfors and David Makinson: 1985, ‘On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction Functions and Their Associated Revision Functions’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530.
Boutilier, Craig: 1993, ‘Revision Sequences and Nested Conditionals’, in R. Bajcsy (ed.), IJCAI-93 Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 519–525.
Boutilier, Craig: 1996, ‘Iterated Revision and Minimal Change of Conditional Beliefs’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 263–305.
Broome, John: 1999, Ethics Out of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Darwiche, Adnan, and Judea Pearl: 1994, ‘On the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision’, in Ronald Fagin, ed., TARK ’94 Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Pacific Grove, Cal.: Morgan Kaufmann, 5–23.
Darwiche, Adnan, and Judea Pearl: 1997, ‘On the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision’, Artificial Intelligence 89, 1–29.
Debreu, Gerard: 1959, Theory of Value, Wiley, New York.
Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro: 1881, Mathematical Psychics, Kegan Paul, London.
Gärdenfors, Peter: 1979, ‘Conditionals and Changes of Belief’, in Illkka Niiniluoto and Raimo Tuomela (eds.), ‘The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 30 (1978), nos. 2–4, 381–404.
Gärdenfors, Peter: 1988, Knowledge in Flux. Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Gärdenfors, Peter, and David Makinson: 1988, ‘Revisions of Knowledge Systems Using Epistemic Entrenchment’, in Moshe Vardi (ed.), TARK ’88 Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann, 83–95.
Grove, Adam: 1988, ‘Two Modellings for Theory Change’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, 157–170.
Haller, Rudolf: 1982a, ‘New Light on the Vienna Circle’, The Monist 65, 25–35.
Haller, Rudolf: 1982b, ‘Das Neurath-Prinzip - Grundlagen und Folgerungen’, in Friedrich Stadler (ed.), Arbeiterbildung in der Zwischenkriegszeit, Locker, Wien, 79–87.
Hansson, Sven Ove: 1999, A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Hansson, Sven Ove (ed.): 1997, Special Issue on ‘Non-Prioritized Belief Revision’, Theoria 63, 11–34.
Hausman, Daniel: 1998, ‘Economics, Philosophy of’, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, electronic edition.
Hausman, Daniel M., and Michael S. McPherson: 1996, Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lehmann, Daniel: 2001, ‘Nonmonotonic Logics and Semantics’, Journal of Logic and Computation11, 229–256.
Lindström, Sten: 1991, ‘A Semantic Approach to Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Inference Operations and Choice’, Uppsala Prints and Preprints in Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Uppsala, 1991:6.
Luce, R. Duncan, and Howard Raiffa: 1957, Gamnes and Decisions, Wiley, New York.
McFadden, Daniel: 1999, ‘Rationality for Economists?’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 73–105.
Moulin, Hervé: 1985, ‘Choice Functions over a Finite Set: A Summary’, Social Choice and Welfare 2, 147–160.
Nayak, Abhaya: 1994, ‘Iterated Belief Change Based on Epistemic Entrenchment’, Erkenntnis 41, 353–390.
Nayak, Abhaya, Maurice Pagnucco and Pavlos Peppas: 2003, ‘Dynamic Belief Revision Operations’,Artificial Intelligence 146, 193–228.
Neurath, Otto: 1931, ‘Soziologie im Physikalismus’, Erkenntnis 2, 393–431
Neurath, Otto: 1931, English translation ‘Sociology in the Framework of Physicalism’ in O.N., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Reidel, Dordrecht 1983, pp 58–90.
Neurath, Otto: 1932/33, ‘Protokollsätze’, Erkenntnis 3, 204–214;
Neurath, Otto: 1932/33, English translation ‘Protocol Statements’ in O.N., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Reidel, Dordrecht 1983, pp 91–99.
Neurath, Otto: 1934, ‘Radikaler Physikalismus und „Wirkliche Welt“’, Erkenntnis 4, 346–362;
Neurath, Otto: 1934, English translation ‘Radical Physicalism and the “Real World”’ in O.N., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Reidel, Dordrecht 1983, pp 100–114.
Pagnucco, Maurice, and Hans Rott: 1999, ‘Severe Withdrawal (and Recovery)’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 28, 501–547. (Corrected reprint in the JPL issue of February 2000.)
Quine, Willard V.O., and Joseph S. Ullian: 1978, The Web of Belief, 2 second edition, Random House, New York.
Rosenberg, Alexander: 1983, ‘If Economics Isn’t Science, What Is It?’, Philosophical Forum 14, 296–314.
Reprinted in E.D. Klemke et al. (eds.), Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science, 3rd edition, Prometheus Books, Amherst 1998, 154–170.
Rosenberg, Alexander: 1995, ‘Philosophy of Economics’, in Robert Audi (ed.), Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 582–583.
Rott, Hans: 1993, ‘Belief Contraction in the Context of the General Theory of Rational Choice’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 58, 1426–1450.
Rott, Hans: 1999, ‘Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief. Part I: Finding the Right Framework’, Erkenntnis 50, 387–412.
Ron, Hans: 2000, ‘Two Dogmas of Belief Revision’, Journal of Philosophy 97, 503–522.
Rott, Hans: 2001, Change, Choice and Inference, Oxford University Press.
Rott, Hans: 2003a, ‘Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief. Part II: Iterated Belief Change Without Dispositional Coherence’, Journal of Logic and Computation 13, 111–145.
Rott, Hans: 2003b, ‘A Counterexample to Six Fundamental Principles of Belief Formation’, manuscript, January 2003.
Schlechta, Karl: 1996, ‘Some Completeness Results for Stoppered and Ranked Classical Preferential Models’, Journal of Logic and Computation 6, 599–622.
Schlick, Moritz: 1934: ‘Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis’ in Erkenntnis 4, 79–99;
Schlick, Moritz: 1934: English translation ‘The Foundation of Knowledge’, in Alfred J. Ayer (ed.), Logical Positivism, New York, Free Press 1959, 209–227.
Sen, Amartya K.: 1993, ‘Internal Consistency of Choice’, Econometrica61, 495–521.
Sen, Amartya K.: 1995, ‘Is the Idea of Purely Internal Consistency of Choice Bizarre?’, in J. E. J. Altham and R. Harrison (eds.), World, Mind, and Ethics. Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 19–31.
Spohn, Wolfgang: 2003, ‘Die Logik und das Induktionsproblem’, in Peter Schroeder-Heister und Wolfgang Spohn (eds.), Logik in der Philosophie, Synchron-Verlag, Heidelberg.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rott, H. (2004). Supplying Planks For Neurath’s Boat: Can Economists Meet The Demands of The Dynamics of Scientific Theories?. In: Stadler, F. (eds) Induction and Deduction in the Sciences. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2196-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2196-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6555-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2196-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive