Skip to main content

Supplying Planks For Neurath’s Boat: Can Economists Meet The Demands of The Dynamics of Scientific Theories?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Induction and Deduction in the Sciences

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook ((VCIY,volume 11))

  • 348 Accesses

Abstract

According to Otto Neurath, the practice of science consists in a large undertaking of setting up and maintaining systems of statements: In unified science we try ... to create a consistent system of protocol statements and nonprotocol statements (including laws). When a new statement is presented to us we compare it with the system at our disposal and check whether the new statement is in contradiction with the system or not. If the new statement is in contradiction with the system, we can discard this statement as unusable (‘false’), for example, the statement: ‘In Africa lions sing only in major chords’ ; however, one can also ‘accept’ the statement and change the system accordingly so that it remains consistent if this statement is added. The statement may then be called ‘true’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchourrón, Carlos, Peter Gärdenfors and David Makinson: 1985, ‘On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction Functions and Their Associated Revision Functions’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier, Craig: 1993, ‘Revision Sequences and Nested Conditionals’, in R. Bajcsy (ed.), IJCAI-93 Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 519–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier, Craig: 1996, ‘Iterated Revision and Minimal Change of Conditional Beliefs’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 263–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, John: 1999, Ethics Out of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwiche, Adnan, and Judea Pearl: 1994, ‘On the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision’, in Ronald Fagin, ed., TARK ’94 Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Pacific Grove, Cal.: Morgan Kaufmann, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwiche, Adnan, and Judea Pearl: 1997, ‘On the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision’, Artificial Intelligence 89, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, Gerard: 1959, Theory of Value, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro: 1881, Mathematical Psychics, Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, Peter: 1979, ‘Conditionals and Changes of Belief’, in Illkka Niiniluoto and Raimo Tuomela (eds.), ‘The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 30 (1978), nos. 2–4, 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, Peter: 1988, Knowledge in Flux. Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, Peter, and David Makinson: 1988, ‘Revisions of Knowledge Systems Using Epistemic Entrenchment’, in Moshe Vardi (ed.), TARK ’88 Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann, 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, Adam: 1988, ‘Two Modellings for Theory Change’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Rudolf: 1982a, ‘New Light on the Vienna Circle’, The Monist 65, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Rudolf: 1982b, ‘Das Neurath-Prinzip - Grundlagen und Folgerungen’, in Friedrich Stadler (ed.), Arbeiterbildung in der Zwischenkriegszeit, Locker, Wien, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven Ove: 1999, A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven Ove (ed.): 1997, Special Issue on ‘Non-Prioritized Belief Revision’, Theoria 63, 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Daniel: 1998, ‘Economics, Philosophy of’, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, electronic edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Daniel M., and Michael S. McPherson: 1996, Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Daniel: 2001, ‘Nonmonotonic Logics and Semantics’, Journal of Logic and Computation11, 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, Sten: 1991, ‘A Semantic Approach to Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Inference Operations and Choice’, Uppsala Prints and Preprints in Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Uppsala, 1991:6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. Duncan, and Howard Raiffa: 1957, Gamnes and Decisions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, Daniel: 1999, ‘Rationality for Economists?’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 73–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, Hervé: 1985, ‘Choice Functions over a Finite Set: A Summary’, Social Choice and Welfare 2, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, Abhaya: 1994, ‘Iterated Belief Change Based on Epistemic Entrenchment’, Erkenntnis 41, 353–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, Abhaya, Maurice Pagnucco and Pavlos Peppas: 2003, ‘Dynamic Belief Revision Operations’,Artificial Intelligence 146, 193–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1931, ‘Soziologie im Physikalismus’, Erkenntnis 2, 393–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1931, English translation ‘Sociology in the Framework of Physicalism’ in O.N., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Reidel, Dordrecht 1983, pp 58–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1932/33, ‘Protokollsätze’, Erkenntnis 3, 204–214;

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1932/33, English translation ‘Protocol Statements’ in O.N., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Reidel, Dordrecht 1983, pp 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1934, ‘Radikaler Physikalismus und „Wirkliche Welt“’, Erkenntnis 4, 346–362;

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto: 1934, English translation ‘Radical Physicalism and the “Real World”’ in O.N., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Reidel, Dordrecht 1983, pp 100–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagnucco, Maurice, and Hans Rott: 1999, ‘Severe Withdrawal (and Recovery)’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 28, 501–547. (Corrected reprint in the JPL issue of February 2000.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard V.O., and Joseph S. Ullian: 1978, The Web of Belief, 2 second edition, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander: 1983, ‘If Economics Isn’t Science, What Is It?’, Philosophical Forum 14, 296–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reprinted in E.D. Klemke et al. (eds.), Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science, 3rd edition, Prometheus Books, Amherst 1998, 154–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander: 1995, ‘Philosophy of Economics’, in Robert Audi (ed.), Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 582–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rott, Hans: 1993, ‘Belief Contraction in the Context of the General Theory of Rational Choice’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 58, 1426–1450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rott, Hans: 1999, ‘Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief. Part I: Finding the Right Framework’, Erkenntnis 50, 387–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ron, Hans: 2000, ‘Two Dogmas of Belief Revision’, Journal of Philosophy 97, 503–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rott, Hans: 2001, Change, Choice and Inference, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rott, Hans: 2003a, ‘Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief. Part II: Iterated Belief Change Without Dispositional Coherence’, Journal of Logic and Computation 13, 111–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rott, Hans: 2003b, ‘A Counterexample to Six Fundamental Principles of Belief Formation’, manuscript, January 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlechta, Karl: 1996, ‘Some Completeness Results for Stoppered and Ranked Classical Preferential Models’, Journal of Logic and Computation 6, 599–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, Moritz: 1934: ‘Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis’ in Erkenntnis 4, 79–99;

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, Moritz: 1934: English translation ‘The Foundation of Knowledge’, in Alfred J. Ayer (ed.), Logical Positivism, New York, Free Press 1959, 209–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K.: 1993, ‘Internal Consistency of Choice’, Econometrica61, 495–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K.: 1995, ‘Is the Idea of Purely Internal Consistency of Choice Bizarre?’, in J. E. J. Altham and R. Harrison (eds.), World, Mind, and Ethics. Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, Wolfgang: 2003, ‘Die Logik und das Induktionsproblem’, in Peter Schroeder-Heister und Wolfgang Spohn (eds.), Logik in der Philosophie, Synchron-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rott, H. (2004). Supplying Planks For Neurath’s Boat: Can Economists Meet The Demands of The Dynamics of Scientific Theories?. In: Stadler, F. (eds) Induction and Deduction in the Sciences. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2196-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2196-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6555-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2196-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics