Skip to main content

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Coloproctology

Abstract

Worldwide, colorectal cancer causes approximately 600,000 deaths per year [1]. About 16,000 of these occur in the UK, where it is the second commonest cause of cancer death. Despite advances in surgery and adjuvant therapies, 5-year survival remains around 50% [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. WHO. Cancer, fact sheet number 297. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2009. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/index.html. Accessed 22 Nov 2011

  2. Cancer Research UK. By stage at diagnosis. London: Cancer Research UK, 2009.http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/bowel/survival/index.htm#stage Accessed 22 Nov 2011.

  3. Atkin W, Morson B, Cuzik J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:658–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burch JA, Soares-Weiser K, St John DJB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of faecal occult blood tests used in screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Med Screen. 2007;14:132–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer: a population based, case-controlled study. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kewenter J, Brevinge H, Engaras B, et al. Results of screening, rescreening and follow up in a prospective randomized study for detection of colorectal cancer by fecal occult-blood testing: results of 68,308 subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;29:468–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hewitson P, Gasziou P, Irwig L, et al. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the faecal occult blood test (haemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1541–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. One-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;9276:1624–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weller D, Coleman D, Robertson R, et al. The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:1601–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tappenden P, Chilcott J, Eggington S, et al. Option appraisal of population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in England. Gut. 2007;56:677–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Robb KA, Miles A, Wardle J. Demographic and psychosocial factors associated with perceived risk for colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:366–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut. 2010;59:666–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Atkin W, Saunders B. Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Gut. 2002;51(Suppl5):V6–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vasen HFA, Mšslein G, Alonso A, et al. Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Gut. 2008;57:704–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Boparai KS, Reitsma JB, Lemmens V, et al. Increased colorectal cancer risk in first-degree relatives of patients with hyperplastic polyposis syndrome. Gut. 2010;59:1222–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Beggs AD, Latchford AR, Vasen HF, et al. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and recommendations for management. Gut. 2010;59:975–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan K. Clark M.A., M.B.B.Chir., M.D., FRCS (Gen Surg.) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clark, S.K. (2012). Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance. In: Brown, S., Hartley, J., Hill, J., Scott, N., Williams, J. (eds) Contemporary Coloproctology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-889-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-889-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-888-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-889-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics