Abstract
This chapter examines the quality assurance aspects of assessing student learning. The terms assessment and evaluation are sometimes used interchangeably. For the purposes of this book, “assessment” is reserved for the description of activities which measure medical student knowledge, performance, and attitudes, while the term “evaluation” is reserved for faculty, student, course, and clinical rotation appraisal and feedback.
Keywords
- Quality Assurance Aspects
- Program Learning Outcomes
- Core Clinical Skills
- Medical Education Programs
- Constructed-response Questions
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Formative assessment is intended to modify and to inform student learning. Formative methods of assessment generally precede a summative assessment method and are not part of the official student record of achievement.
- 2.
Summative assessment evaluates mastery of the learning objectives of the course, forms part or all of the final result, and determines progression within the course.
- 3.
Most Universities require specific attributes be achieved by all university graduates. Typically these include; Knowledge, Communication skills Problem-solving skills, International perspective and Social responsibility.
References
Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63–7.
Coderre S, Woloschuk W, McLaughlin K. Twelve tips for blueprinting. Med Teach. 2009;31(4):322–4.
Norcini JJ, Swanson DB, Grosso LJ, Shea JA, Webster GD. A comparison of knowledge, synthesis, and clinical judgment. Multiple-choice questions in the assessment of physician competence. Eval Health Prof. 1984;7(4):485–99 [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t].
Swanson DB, Holtzman KZ, Allbee K, Clauser BE. Psychometric characteristics and response times for content-parallel extended-matching and one-best-answer items in relation to number of options. Acad Med. 2006;81(10 Suppl):S52–5.
Page G, Bordage G, Allen T. Developing key-feature problems and examinations to assess clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med. 1995;70(3):194–201 [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t].
Feletti GI, Engel CE. The modified essay question for testing problem-solving skills. Med J Aust. 1980;1(2):79–80.
Harden RM. Twelve tips for organizing an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Med Teach. 1990;12(3–4):259–64.
Friedman Ben David M, Davis MH, Harden RM, Howie PW, Ker J, Pippard MJ. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 24: portfolios as a method of student assessment. Med Teach. 2001;23(6):535–51.
van der Vleuten CP. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ. 1996;1(1):41–67.
Norcini J. Setting standards on educational tests. Med Educ. 2003;37(5):464–9.
van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ. 2005;39(3):309–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MacCarrick, G. (2013). Assessment of Learning. In: Quality Assurance in Medical Education. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-713-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-713-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-712-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-713-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)