Skip to main content

Complex Decision Support in Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 918 Accesses

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Abstract

In the last three chapters, we discussed some of the issues that make the field of decision support challenging, as well as the theoretical foundations of several widely used approaches to decision support. Business workflow technology has been emphasized because it is much more mature (if pricey and proprietary), as a basis for decision support, than similar approaches that are now being explored in the medical area. While practitioners of medicine have long claimed that the problems of medicine are unique, the assertion of exceptionalism can be made truthfully for almost any complex domain, whether it involves the construction of aircraft or the operations of a multi-national investment firm. Proper operations of business workflows that involve large financial transactions is every bit as important to the organization’s well-being as the proper management of patients in a healthcare organization. My belief is that reusing and adapting ideas that have worked elsewhere is likely to be more productive in the long term than trying to rediscover first principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Miller R, Masarie FE, Myers JD. Quick medical reference (QMR) for diagnostic assistance. MD Comput. 1986;3(5):34-48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Warner HR Jr. Iliad: moving medical decision-making into new frontiers. Methods Inf Med. 1989;28(4):370-372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peleg M, Tu S, Bury J, et al. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):52-68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boxwala AA, Peleg M, Tu S, et al. GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. J Biomed Inform. 2004;37(3):147-161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wikipedia. IntelliSense. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IntelliSense. Cited 3/2/2010.

  6. Tu SW, Musen MA, Shankar R, et al. Modeling guidelines for integration into clinical workflow. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):174-178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tu SW, Campbell JR, Glasgow J, et al. The SAGE Guideline Model: achievements and ­overview. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(5):589-598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ram P, Berg D, Mansfield G, et al. Executing clinical practice guidelines with the SAGE execution engine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(251–5):251-255.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sordo M, Ogunyemi O, Boxwala AA, Greenes RA. GELLO: an object-oriented query and expression language for clinical decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003:1012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Warmer JB, Kleppe AG. The Object Constraint Language: Precise Modeling with Uml, Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series (Paperback). Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Demuth B. The Dresden OCL toolkit and the business rules approach. Available from: http://st.inf.tu-dresden.de/files/papers/EBRC2005_Demuth.pdf. Cited 7/6/2010.

  12. Chiorean D, Bortes M, Corutiu D. Proposals for a widespread use of OCL. Workshop on tool support for OCL and related formalisms; 2005; EPFL, Montego Bay, Jamaica.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kawamoto K, Lobach DF. Design, implementation, use, and preliminary evaluation of SEBASTIAN, a standards-based Web service for clinical decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:380–384.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kawamoto K, Lobach D. Proposal for fulfilling strategic objectives of the U.S. Roadmap for national action on decision support through a service-oriented architecture leveraging HL7 services. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:146-155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawamoto K, Honey A, Rubin K. The HL7-OMG healthcare services specification project: motivation, methodology, and deliverables for enabling a semantically interoperable service-oriented architecture for healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(6):874-881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kay R. QuickStudy: representational state transfer (REST). Available from: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/297424/Representational_State_Transfer_REST_. Cited 11/2/10.

  17. Martin R. Web services: hope or hype? Available from: http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~rmartin/talks/WS-comrise.pdf. Cited 4/6/10.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nadkarni, P.M. (2011). Complex Decision Support in Practice. In: Metadata-driven Software Systems in Biomedicine. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-510-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-510-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-509-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-510-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics