Abstract
In the last three chapters, we discussed some of the issues that make the field of decision support challenging, as well as the theoretical foundations of several widely used approaches to decision support. Business workflow technology has been emphasized because it is much more mature (if pricey and proprietary), as a basis for decision support, than similar approaches that are now being explored in the medical area. While practitioners of medicine have long claimed that the problems of medicine are unique, the assertion of exceptionalism can be made truthfully for almost any complex domain, whether it involves the construction of aircraft or the operations of a multi-national investment firm. Proper operations of business workflows that involve large financial transactions is every bit as important to the organization’s well-being as the proper management of patients in a healthcare organization. My belief is that reusing and adapting ideas that have worked elsewhere is likely to be more productive in the long term than trying to rediscover first principles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Miller R, Masarie FE, Myers JD. Quick medical reference (QMR) for diagnostic assistance. MD Comput. 1986;3(5):34-48.
Warner HR Jr. Iliad: moving medical decision-making into new frontiers. Methods Inf Med. 1989;28(4):370-372.
Peleg M, Tu S, Bury J, et al. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):52-68.
Boxwala AA, Peleg M, Tu S, et al. GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. J Biomed Inform. 2004;37(3):147-161.
Wikipedia. IntelliSense. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IntelliSense. Cited 3/2/2010.
Tu SW, Musen MA, Shankar R, et al. Modeling guidelines for integration into clinical workflow. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):174-178.
Tu SW, Campbell JR, Glasgow J, et al. The SAGE Guideline Model: achievements and overview. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(5):589-598.
Ram P, Berg D, Mansfield G, et al. Executing clinical practice guidelines with the SAGE execution engine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(251–5):251-255.
Sordo M, Ogunyemi O, Boxwala AA, Greenes RA. GELLO: an object-oriented query and expression language for clinical decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003:1012.
Warmer JB, Kleppe AG. The Object Constraint Language: Precise Modeling with Uml, Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series (Paperback). Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1998.
Demuth B. The Dresden OCL toolkit and the business rules approach. Available from: http://st.inf.tu-dresden.de/files/papers/EBRC2005_Demuth.pdf. Cited 7/6/2010.
Chiorean D, Bortes M, Corutiu D. Proposals for a widespread use of OCL. Workshop on tool support for OCL and related formalisms; 2005; EPFL, Montego Bay, Jamaica.
Kawamoto K, Lobach DF. Design, implementation, use, and preliminary evaluation of SEBASTIAN, a standards-based Web service for clinical decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:380–384.
Kawamoto K, Lobach D. Proposal for fulfilling strategic objectives of the U.S. Roadmap for national action on decision support through a service-oriented architecture leveraging HL7 services. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:146-155.
Kawamoto K, Honey A, Rubin K. The HL7-OMG healthcare services specification project: motivation, methodology, and deliverables for enabling a semantically interoperable service-oriented architecture for healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(6):874-881.
Kay R. QuickStudy: representational state transfer (REST). Available from: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/297424/Representational_State_Transfer_REST_. Cited 11/2/10.
Martin R. Web services: hope or hype? Available from: http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~rmartin/talks/WS-comrise.pdf. Cited 4/6/10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nadkarni, P.M. (2011). Complex Decision Support in Practice. In: Metadata-driven Software Systems in Biomedicine. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-510-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-510-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-509-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-510-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)