Skip to main content

Building Compact Rulesets for Describing Continuous-Valued Problem Spaces Using a Learning Classifier System

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Learning Classifier Systems have previously been shown to have some application in deducing the characteristics of complex multi-modal test environments to a suitable level of accuracy. In this study, the issue of presenting human-readable rulesets to a potential user is addressed. In particular, two existing ruleset compaction algorithms originally devised for rulesets with an integer-valued representation are applied to rulesets with a continuous-valued representation. The algorithms are used to reduce the size of rulesets evolved by the XCS classifier system. Following initial testing, both algorithms are modified to take into account problems associated with the new representation. Finally, the modified algorithms are shown to outperform the originals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beasley D, Bull D, Martin R (1993) A Sequential Niche Technique for Multimodal Function Optimisation. Evolutionary Computation, 1(2); 101–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blake C, Merz C (1998) UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bull L, Wyatt D, Parmee I (2002) Initial Modifications to XCS for use in Interactive Evolutionary Design. In: Parallel Problem Solving From Nature-PPSN VII, Springer Verlag; 568–577

    Google Scholar 

  4. Butz M, Wilson S (2001) An Algorithmic Description of XCS. In: Advances in Learning Classifier Systems. Third International Workshop (IWLCS-2000), Lecture Notes in AI (LNAI-1996). Springer-Verlag:Berlin; 253–272

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fu C, Davis L (2002) A Modified Classifier System Compaction Algorithm, Proc. of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2002; 920–925

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holland J (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holland J (1986) Escaping Brittleness: the Possibilities of General-Purpose Learning Algorithms Applied to Parallel Rule-based Systems. In: Machine Learning, An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Morgan Kaufmann

    Google Scholar 

  8. Japkowicz N, Stephen S (2002) The Class Imbalance Problem: A Systematic Study. Intelligent Data Analysis, 6(5); 429–450

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaelbling L, Littman M, Moore A (1996) Reinforcement Learning: A Survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 4; 237–285

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kocis L, Whiten W (1997) Computational Investigations in Low Discrepancy Sequences, ACM Trans. on Mathematical Software, 23(2); 266–294

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Parmee IC (1996) The Maintenance of Search Diversity for Effective Design Space Decomposition using Cluster-Oriented Genetic Algorithms (COGAs) and Multi-Agent Strategies (GAANT). In: Proc. of 2nd International Conf. on Adaptive Computing in Engineering Design and Control; 128–138

    Google Scholar 

  12. Parmee IC (2002) Improving Problem Definition through Interactive Evolutionary Computation. In: Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacture, 16(3)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stone C, Bull L (2003) For Real! XCS with Continuous-Valued Inputs. Evolutionary Computation 11(3); 299–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson S (1995) Classifier Fitness Based on Accuracy. Evolutionary Computation 3(2); 149–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson S (2000) Get real! XCS with Continuous-valued inputs. In: Learning Classifier Systems. From Foundations to Applications Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI-1813) Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 209–222

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson S (2001) Compact Rulesets for XCSI. In: Advances in Learning Classifier Systems. Fourth International Workshop (IWLCS-2001), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI-2321). Springer-Verlag:Berlin; 197–210

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson S (2001) Mining Oblique Data with XCS, In: Advances in Learning Classifier Systems. Third International Workshop (IWLCS-2000), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI-1996). Springer-Verlag:Berlin; 158–177

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wyatt D, Bull L (2003) Using XCS to Describe Continuous-Valued Problem Spaces. Technical Report UWELCSG03-004

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wyatt, D., Bull, L., Parmee, I.C. (2004). Building Compact Rulesets for Describing Continuous-Valued Problem Spaces Using a Learning Classifier System. In: Parmee, I.C. (eds) Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture VI. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-338-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-338-1_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-829-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-338-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics