Skip to main content

Economics of Electricity Supply

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 10k Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an introduction to the economic concepts related to the electricity sector. It introduces the key concepts related to the electricity supply industry (such as load duration curve, capacity factor, and load diversity) and provides simple decision-making tools such as merit order dispatch, levelised costs and screening curves that are used in the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Refer to Kirschen and Sadi (2004) for more on electricity system economics in the competitive era.

  2. 2.

    For a more detailed analysis of the reliability concepts related to the electricity sector and its incorporation in the system analysis, consult Munasinghe (1979).

  3. 3.

    Hydro-thermal systems require somewhat more complicated analysis.

  4. 4.

    Energy-not-served (ENS) or expected un-served energy is “the expected amount of energy not supplied per year owing to deficiencies in generating capacities and/or shortage in energy supplies” (International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 1984).

References

  • CERI (2004) Levelised unit electricity cost comparison of alternate technologies for baseload generation in Ontario. Canadian Energy Research Institute, Calgary, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley AM, O’Gallachoir BP, Hur J, Baldick R, McKeogh EJ (2010) A strategic review of electricity system models. Energy, 35(12):4522–4530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heptonstall P (2007) A review of electricity unit cost estimates. UKERC working paper, UKERC/WP/TPA/2007/006, UK Energy Research Centre (see www.ukerc.ac.uk)

  • Hertzmark D (2007) Risk assessment methods for power utility planning. Special report 001/07 March 2007; Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme of the World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs BF (1995) Optimisation methods for electricity utility resource planning. Eur J Oper Res 83(1):1–20

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (1984) Expansion planning for electrical generating system: a guidebook, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (1998) Wien Automatic System Planning (WASP) package: a computer code for power generating system expansion planning version. WASP-IV—user’s manual, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagiannas AG, Askounis DTh, Psarras J (2004) Power generation planning: a survey from monopoly to competition. Int J Electr Pow Energy Syst 26:413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschen D, Sadi, (2004) Fundamentals of power system economics. Wiley, London (see ebrary)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koomey J, Rosenfeld AH, Gadgil A (1990) Conservation screening curves to compare efficiency investments to power plants: applications to commercial sector conservation programms. In: Proceedings of the 1990 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Asilomar, CA (see http://enduse.lbl.gov/info/ConsScreenCurves.pdf)

  • Masters GM (2004) Renewable and efficient electric power systems. Wiley, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Munasinghe M (1979) The economics of power system reliability and planning. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) The costs of generating electricity. The Royal Academy of Engineering, London (see http://www.countryguardian.net/generation_costs_report.pdf)

  • Stoll HG (1989) Least cost electric utility planning. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey R, Anderson D (1979) Electricity economics: essays and case studies, A World Bank Research Publication (see http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2001/01/10/000178830_98101911363556/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf)

  • Wood AJ, Woolenberg BF (1996) Power generation, operation and control, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • IEA (2004) World energy investment outlook. International Energy Agency, Paris (see http://www.iea.org//Textbase/nppdf/free/2003/weio.pdf)

  • Marsh WD (1980) Economics of electric utility power generation. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Munasinghe M, Warford JJ (1982) Electricity pricing: theory and case studies. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakawiro T (2008) High gas dependence in electricity generation in Thailand: the vulnerability analysis. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Dundee, Dundee

    Google Scholar 

  • Park YM, Park JB, Won JR (1998) A hybrid genetic algorithm/dynamic programming approach to optimal long-term generation expansion planning. Int J Electr Pow Energy Syst 20(4):295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swisher JN, Jannuzzi GM, Redlinger RY (1997) Tools and methods for integrated resource planning: improving energy efficiency and protecting the environment. UCCEE, Riso (see http://www.uneprisoe.org/IRPManual/IRPmanual.pdf)

  • Viscusi WK, Vernon JH, Harrington JE Jr (2005) Economics of regulation and antitrust. MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. C. Bhattacharyya .

Appendices

Annex 10.1: Levelisation Factor for a Uniform Annual Escalating Series

Assume that

  • A is the annual cost in the first year,

  • a is the escalation rate per year,

  • n is the number of years used in the analysis,

  • i is the discount rate,

  • P is the present worth of the cost series,

  • U is the annual levelised cost.

As the cost increases every year at the rate ‘a’, the cost changes from one year to the other as follows: A, A(1 + a), A(1 + a)2,…, A(1 + a)n − 1 

The present value of this cost series is given by

$$ \begin{gathered} P = {\frac{A}{(1 + i)}} + {\frac{A(1 + a)}{{(1 + i)^{2} }}} + {\frac{{A(1 + a)^{2} }}{{(1 + i)^{3} }}} + \cdots + {\frac{{A(1 + a)^{n - 1} }}{{(1 + i)^{n} }}} \hfill \\ \,\,\,\, = \,A\left[ {{\frac{1}{(1 + i)}} + {\frac{(1 + a)}{{(1 + i)^{2} }}} + {\frac{{(1 + a)^{2} }}{{(1 + i)^{3} }}} + \cdots + {\frac{{(1 + a)^{n - 1} }}{{(1 + i)^{n} }}}} \right] \hfill \\ \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(10.13)

Multiplying Eq. 10.13 by (1 + i) results in

$$ \begin{gathered} P(1 + i) = A\left[ {1 + {\frac{(1 + a)}{(1 + i)}} + {\frac{{(1 + a)^{2} }}{{(1 + i)^{2} }}} + \cdots + {\frac{{(1 + a)^{n - 1} }}{{(1 + i)^{n - 1} }}}} \right] \hfill \\ \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(10.14)

Multiplying Eq. 10.13 by (1 + a) results in

$$ \begin{gathered} P(1 + a) = A\left[ {{\frac{(1 + a)}{(1 + i)}} + {\frac{{(1 + a)^{2} }}{{(1 + i)^{2} }}} + \cdots + {\frac{{(1 + a)^{n} }}{{(1 + i)^{n} }}}} \right] \hfill \\ \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(10.15)

Subtracting Eq. 10.15 from 10.14 gives rise to the following:

$$ P(i - a) = A\left[ {1 - \left( {{\frac{{(1 + a)^{n} }}{{(1 + i)^{n} }}}} \right)} \right] $$
(10.16)

Therefore, the present worth of this annual series is

$$ P = {\frac{{A\left[ {\left( {1 - {\frac{{(1 +a)^{n} }}{{(1 + i)^{n} }}}} \right)} \right]}}{(i - a)}} = A \times \left( {{\text{Present}}\;{\text{value}}\;{\text{function}}} \right) $$
(10.17)

where present value function is

$$\text{ \text{PVF}} = {\frac{{A\left[ {1 - \left( {{\frac{{(1 + a)^{n} }}{{(1 + i)^{n} }}}} \right)} \right]}}{(i - a)}} $$

The annual series U that would yield the same present value as above is given by

$$ U = {\frac{{\left[ {1 - \left( {{\frac{{(1 + a)^{n} }}{{(1 + i)^{n} }}}} \right)} \right]}}{(i - a)}}\left[ {{\frac{{i(1 + i)^{n} }}{{(1 + i)^{n} - 1}}}} \right] = \text {PVF} \times \text{CRF} $$
(10.18)

where

$$ \hbox{CRF} = \left[ {{\frac{{i(1 + i)^{n} }}{{(1 + i)^{n} - 1}}}} \right] $$
(10.19)

Note that the levelising factor is reduced to unity when there is no escalation (i.e. a = 0).

For the example in Fig. 10.4, a is 5%, i is 10% and n is 20 years. Using these data in Eq. 10.18 gives, U = 1.423.

For further details on these topics, see Stoll (1989) and Masters (2004).

Annex 10.2: A Brief Description of the WASP-IV Model

The WASP model developed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is a widely used tool that has become the standard approach to electricity investment planning around the world (Hertzmark 2007). The current version, WASP-IV, finds the optimal expansion plan for a power generating system subject to constraints specified by the user. The programme minimises the discounted costs of electricity generation, which fundamentally comprise capital investment, fuel cost, operation and maintenance cost, and cost of energy-not-served (ENS)Footnote 4 (International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 1998). The demand for electricity is exogenously given and using a detailed information of available resources, technological options (candidate plants and committed plants) and the constraints on the environment, operation and other practical considerations (such as implementation issues), the model provides the capacity to be added in the future and the cost of achieving such a capacity addition.

To find optimal plan for electricity capacity expansion, WASP-IV programme evaluates all possible sets of power plants to be added during the planning horizon while fulfilling all constraints. Basically, the evaluation for optimal plan is based on the minimisation of cost function (International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 1984), which comprises of: depreciable capital investment costs (covering equipment, site installation costs, salvage value of investment costs), non-depreciable capital investment costs (covering fuel inventory, initial stock of spare parts etc.), fuel costs, non-fuel operation and maintenance costs and cost of the energy-not-served. Overall, the structure of WASP-IV programme can be presented in Fig. 10.7.

Fig. 10.7
figure 7

Overall structure of WASP-IV

The model works well for an integrated, traditional system but the reform process in the electricity industry has brought a disintegrated system in many countries. The model is less suitable for such reformed markets.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhattacharyya, S.C. (2011). Economics of Electricity Supply. In: Energy Economics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-268-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-268-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-267-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-268-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics