Skip to main content

Failure Time Models Based on Degradation Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Degradation Modeling

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry and Technology ((SIT))

Abstract

Many failure mechanisms can be traced to underlying degradation processes and stochastically changing covariates. Degradation and covariate data can provide much reliability information additional to failure time data and are particularly useful when the application of traditional reliability models is limited due to rare failures of highly reliable items or due to items operating in dynamic environments. This chapter surveys some approaches to model the relationship between failure time data and degradation and covariate data. These models which reflect the dependency between system state and system reliability include threshold models and hazard-based models. In particular, we consider the class of degradation–threshold–shock models in which failure is due to the competing causes of degradation and trauma. For this class of reliability models we compute the survival function of the resulting failure time and derive the likelihood function for the joint observation of failure times and degradation data at discrete times. We consider a special class of degradation–threshold–shock models where degradation is modeled by a process with stationary independent increments and related to external covariates through a random timescale and extend this model class to repairable items by a marked point process approach. The proposed model class provides a rich conceptual framework for the study of degradation–failure issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aven, T. and Jensen, U. (1999). Stochastic Models in Reliability. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bagdonavičius, V. (1978). Testing the hypothesis of the additive accumulation of damage, Probability Theory and its Applications, 23, 403–408.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bagdonavičius, V. and Nikulin, M.S. (2001). Estimation in degradation models with explanatory variables, Lifetime Data Analysis, 7, 85–103.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bagdonavičius, V., Bikelis, A., and Kazakečius, V. (2004). Statistical analysis of linear degradation and failure time data with multiple failure modes. Lifetime Data Analysis, 10, 65–81.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bagdonavičius, V., Bikelis, A., Kazakečius, V., and Nikulin, M.S. (2006). Non-parametric estimation in degradation-renewal-failure models, In: Probability, Statistics and Modelling in Public Health, M.S. Nikulin, D. Commenges, and Huber, C. (eds.), Springer Science+Business Media .

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bogdanoff, J.L. and Kozin, F. (1985). Probabilistic Methods of Cumulative Damage, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carey, M.B. and Koenig, R.H. (1991). Reliability assessment based on accelerated degradation: A case study, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 40, 499–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Couallier, V. (2006). Some recent results on joint degradation and failure time modelling. In: Probability, Statistics and Modelling in Public Health, M.S. Nikulin, D. Commenges, and Huber, C. (eds.), Springer Science+Business Media .

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cox, D.R. (1999). Some remarks on failure-times, surrogate markers, degradation, wear and the quality of life, Lifetime Data Analysis, 5, 307–314.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Doksum, K.A. and Hoyland, A. (1992). Models for variable-stress accelerated life testing experiment based on a Wiener process and the inverse Gaussian distribution, Technometrics, 34, 74–82.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Doksum, K.A. and Normand, S.L.T. (1995). Gaussian models for degradation processes – part I: Methods for the analysis of biomarker data, Lifetime Data Analysis, 1, 131–144.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Finkelstein, M.S. (2004). On the exponential formula of reliability, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 53, 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Flournoy, N. (1980). On the survivor and hazard functions. Paper read at the 1980 Statistical Meetings, Houston, Texas: Abstract published by the American Statistical Association .

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kahle, W. and Lehmann, A. (1998). Parameter estimation in damage processes: Dependent observations of damage increments and first passage time. In: Advances in Stochastic Models for Reliability, Quality and Safety, W. Kahle, E. von Collani, F. Franz, and U. Jensen, (eds.), Birkhauser, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kalbfleisch, J.D. and Prentice, R.S. (1980). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kebir, Y. (1991). On hazard rate processes, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 38, 865–876.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawless, J. and Crowder, M. (2004). Covariates and random effects in a gamma process model with application to degradation and failure Lifetime Data Analysis, 10, 213–227.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, M.L.T., DeGruttola, V., and Schoenfeld, D. (2000). A model for markers and latent health status, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 62, 747–762.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lehmann, A. (2001). A Wiener process based model for failure and degradation data in dynamic environments, Dresdner Schriften zur Mathemat. Stochastik, 4/2001, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lehmann, A. (2004). On a degradation-failure model for repairable items. In: Semiparametric Models and its Applications for Reliability, Survival Analysis and Quality of Life, M.S. Nikulin, N. Balakrishnan, N. Limnios, and M. Mesbah (eds.), Birkhauser, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lehmann, A. (2005). Joint models for degradation and failure time data, In: Proceedings of the International Workshop Statistical Modelling and Inference in Life Sciences, September 1–4. Potsdam.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lehmann, A. (2009). Joint modeling of degradation and failure time data, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139, 1693–1706.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Lemoine, A.L. and Wenocur, M.L. (1985). On failure modeling, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 32, 479–508.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu, C.J. and Meeker, W.Q. (1993). Using degradation measures to estimate a time-to-failure distribution, Technometrics, 35, 161–174.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Meeker, W.Q. and Escobar, L.A. (1998). Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Meeker, W.Q., Escobar, L.A., and Lu, C.J. (1998). Accelerated degradation test: Modeling and analysis, Technometrics, 40, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Padgett, W.J. and Tomlinson, M.A. (2004). Inference from accelerated degradation and failure data based on Gaussian process models, Lifetime Data Analysis, 10, 191–206.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Padgett, W.J. and Tomlinson, M.A. (2005). Accelerated degradation models for failure based on geometric Brownian motion and gamma processes, Lifetime Data Analysis, 11, 511–527.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Shaked, M. and Shantikumar, J.G. (1988). On the first-passage times of pure jump processes, Journal of Applied Probability, 25, 501–509.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Singpurwalla, N.D. (1995). Survival in dynamic environments, Statistical Science, 10, 86–103.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Singpurwalla, N.D. and Wilson, S.P. (1995). The exponential formula of reliability and survival: Does is always hold? Lifetime Data Analysis, 1, 187–194.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Singpurwalla, N.D. and Youngren, M.A. (1998). Multivariate distributions induced by dynamic environments, Scandinaviar Journal of Statistics, 20, 251–261.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsiatis, A.A. and Davidian, M. (2004). Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: An overview, Statistics Sinica, 14, 809–834.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Wenocur, M.L. (1986). Brownian motion with quadratic killing and some implications, Journal of Applied Probability, 23, 893–903.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Wenocur, M.L. (1989). A reliability model based on the gamma process and its analytical theory, Advances in Applied Probability, 21, 899–918.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Whitmore, G.A. (1995). Estimation degradation by a Wiener diffusion process subject to measurement error, Lifetime Data Analysis, 1, 307–319.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Whitmore, G.A. and Schenkelberg, F. (1997). Modelling accelerated degradation data using Wiener diffusion with a time scale transformation, Lifetime Data Analysis, 3, 27–45.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Whitmore, G.A., Crowder, M.I., and Lawless, J. (1998). Failure inference from a marker process based on a bivariate Wiener model, Lifetime Data Analysis, 4, 229–251.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Yashin, A.I. (1985). Dynamics in survival analysis: conditional Gaussian property versus Cameron-Martin formula. In: Statistics and Control of Stochastic Processes, N.V. Krylov, R.S. Liptser, and A.A. Novikov (eds.), Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yashin, A.I. and Arjas, E. (1988). A note on random intensities and conditional survival functions, Journal of Applied Probability, 25, 630–635.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Yashin, A.I. and Manton, G.M. (1997). Effects of unobserved and partially observed covariate processes on system failure: A review a models and estimation strategies, Statistical Science, 12, 20–34.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Birkhaüser Boston, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lehmann, A. (2010). Failure Time Models Based on Degradation Processes. In: Nikulin, M., Limnios, N., Balakrishnan, N., Kahle, W., Huber-Carol, C. (eds) Advances in Degradation Modeling. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4924-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics